[IMG]http//img82.exs.cx/img82/9610/amgard.gif[/IMG]

Damn, I hate that guy.

http//img82.exs.cx/img82/9610/amgard.gif

BTW, Amgard is a mod at a well known ki forum.

http://s3.invisionfree.com/Ki_University/index.php

If you're interested.

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 11, 2004

Answers

...?

-- yuu (lmnop@qrst.com), November 11, 2004.

http//img82.exs.cx/img82/9610/amgard.gif

Copy and paste that in you're browser. You'll see what I mean.

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 12, 2004.

well, i think he did a good job of exposing the FACTS that Bush is a greedy-warloving-oil&moneymaking-asshole that doesn't deserve to be our president. it's only a matter of time before YOU too find out. more people have lost their jobs during his presidency than any other president in over 50 YEARS! and o yeah, only dumb people voted for bush. see Here: http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00CWTs

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 12, 2004.

Okay, but if he really is a greedy-warloving-oil&moneymaking-asshole with no regard to the people of America, can you explain the fact that no American has died of a terrorist attack since he became president and started taking action the way he has??? Or the fact that a record number of Americans voted for Bush, having both the majority of Electral votes and overall votes (something that hasnt happened since Ronald Raegan was president) and having 70% percent of all Christian Americans being in favor of Bush???

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 13, 2004.

ok, in response to that:

1) a TON of americans have died in Iraq for invisible weapons of mass destruction

2) most americans that are white and christan voted for bush. its a fact. HOWEVER, most of minorities and people of other faiths such as Islam didn't. if this election had taken place in 2010 (when %30 of americans will speak spanish), this would have been VERY different.

ps. i can't wait for the LPJZ "collision course" cd 3) y do you care? don't you live in S.Africa?

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 13, 2004.

Ok, here's my response.

1. Tons of Americans didnt die. Only +- 1000 Americans did (its a very, very small amount for a war that has been going on for two years) and Iraq has showed us (on more than one occasion) that they did have the technology and the resources to make weapons of mass destruction. If they didnt already, it was only a matter of time untill they did. Also, Sadam is a tyrant to the civilised world (He killed more of his own people than most wars did. He even killed his own brother) and would have been the cause of a major holy war (Don't you Americans even care that they hate you so much, that they'll go the extremese of suicide just to fly a plane into one of you're buildings???)

2. Like I said(and I'm not fully agreeing with you on what you said there), a record number of people voted, and a huge number of votes went to Bush (A record number of votes to one candidate). And what I meant with 70% of all Christians voted for Bush, is that Bush had the right Christian ideals with what he was doing.

3. Yes, I do, but I still care. Just because I live in another country (land, for that matter) doesnt mean that I dont care what goes on in the world. I like Bush, and I think he has the right ideas in mind with ridding the world of terrorist scum.

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 13, 2004.

Sadam had nothing to do with the 9-11 terrorist attacks, even the whitehouse admits it. Even though he was a terrible leader, he didn't need to be "taken care of" when the we had other terrorists on our butt.

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 14, 2004.

"Only +- 1000 Americans" <<
-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 14, 2004.

"Only +- 1000 Americans" <<< they didn't need to die in the first place. the "war" was simply a crushing of Iraq, they had NO chance period. their military "weapons" were WAYYY behind the US's technology and therefore couldn't possibly put up a fight. it's like stealing candy from a diabetic baby.

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 14, 2004.

Except that the baby is a sadistic maniac that killed his own brother and fellow babies and likes to terrorize other countries and/or religions by sending equally stupid and sadistic babies to sacrifice themselves to do damage to the before mentioned countries and/or religions so that the could have a promise of an afterlife filled with virgin bottles.

Come on dude, would you say the same thing back in the 1940s when Hitler was trying to purge the world of Jews. Those people didnt die for nothing, they died to prevent something worse from happening.

But the terrorist that were responsible for the 9-11 atacks, were in Iraq.

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 17, 2004.

"But the terrorist that were responsible for the 9-11 attacks, were in Iraq" -- )v(ajin\/egita

thats not true, thier is no evidence that the 9/11 terrorist were from Iraq. Who ever told you this, is lieing

-- sam (ghomes_2@hotmail.com), November 17, 2004.

by the way none of the links you posted, work

-- sam (ghomes_2@hotmail.com), November 17, 2004.

i kinda agree with )v(\/ on this =P well kinda..hey )v(\/ =P not meaning 2 go off topic here so go back 2 writing about bush and saddam and whoever else...

-- ~*AngelGoten*~ (angelgoten@hotmail.com), November 18, 2004.

Those 1k Americans who died in Iraq wasn't even fighting a war. They were just fighting civilians who doesn't want to be suppressed.

-- ubb (demonreaper73@hotmail.com), November 18, 2004.

Bullshit. Those "civilians" were soldiers that openly put their faith and belief in a madman that wants to purge the world of other religions. Does the fact that they hate everything to do with Christianity not bother you??? They actually believe that if they kill enough Christians, they would go to a heaven filled with virgins especially for them.

First dude, bullshit. There were alot reports that Al Queda were in part responsible for the 9-11 attacks.

And what about al the hostage situations. I see alot of people complaining that innocent people are killed in Iraq because of Bush, but what about those dudes that were slaughtered in front of the camera??? That seems like actions that condones war to me.

Sorry about the link. Looks like it was taken off. It basically showed a moving gif image of somebody blowinf off Michael Moore's head.

-- )v(ajin\/egita (info@smserve.co.za), November 18, 2004.

OMG! the Al Queda is NOT in Iraq. and btw, the civilians were BRAIN- WASHED. Afterall, you said yourself that Saddam was like Hitler.

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 18, 2004.

Bullshit. Those "civilians" were soldiers that openly put their faith and belief in a madman that wants to purge the world of other religions. Does the fact that they hate everything to do with Christianity not bother you??? They actually believe that if they kill enough Christians, they would go to a heaven filled with virgins especially for them. First dude, bullshit. There were alot reports that Al Queda were in part responsible for the 9-11 attacks. And what about al the hostage situations. I see alot of people complaining that innocent people are killed in Iraq because of Bush, but what about those dudes that were slaughtered in front of the camera??? That seems like actions that condones war to me. Sorry about the link. Looks like it was taken off. It basically showed a moving gif image of somebody blowinf off Michael Moore's head. -- )v(ajin\/egita

-- )v(ajin\/egita, First of all, Al Queda was never in Iraq, You still have not showed any evidence if al Queda was in iraq pre-9/11, but let me tell this, Al Queda the hated saddam hussein. So why would they be in iraq if the hated saddam hussein. also your quote from early in you post

"Does the fact that they hate everything to do with Christianity not bother you??? They actually believe that if they kill enough Christians, they would go to a heaven filled with virgins especially for them." -- )v(ajin\/egita

first of all,I see these Iraq insurengents or what ever you called them as people who are trying to free thier country from the american occupation. How would you fell if some invading country took over your country. You would probably want to fight back too right. As for the virgin thing i hve no clue were that came from. Islam is a religion of peace. It teaches tolerance of other religion. (ie Christianity as in your case. Do some reasearch before you post somthing igorant

-- sam (ghomes_2@hotmail.com), November 18, 2004.

and, oh yeah )v(ajin\/egita , i believe the potitically correct term is "Bushit". lol

-- Pearson (none@aol.com), November 19, 2004.

There have been 1,363 coalition deaths, 1,217 Americans, 74 Britons, seven Bulgarians, one Dane, two Dutch, two Estonians, one Hungarian, 19 Italians, one Latvian, 13 Poles, one Salvadoran, three Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and nine Ukrainians in the war in Iraq as of November 18, 2004. (Graphical breakdown of casualties). The list below is the names of the soldiers, Marines, airmen, sailors and Coast Guardsmen whose families have been notified of their deaths by each country's government. At least 8,956 U.S. troops have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon. The Pentagon does not report the number of non-hostile wounded. This list is updated regularly. For a historical look at U.S. war casualties, click here, and to view a list of casualties in the war in Afghanistan, click here. wounded is a nice way of saying maimed..

-- (...@..com), November 19, 2004.

Tee tee tohhh tee taaaah...what about poor Margaret Hassan? WTF did the Irish do to Iraq? OK I know Shannon Airport was being used as a stop for the American Warplanes, but come on, loads of people in Ireland were against it... (sigh, BTW ONLY I'm allowed to do a leprechaun impression 'cos i'm Irish!)

-- Cian Johnston (cianjohnston@hotmail.com), November 19, 2004.

"Does the fact that they hate everything to do with Christianity not bother you???"

If Christianity's hostility toward Islam doesn't bother you, I don't see why you should be bothered that the Islamic people hate Christianity with a passion.

I'm not sure if your pro-bush argument is a joke or not, but if it's not, you're not doing a good job at it. Stuff like saying 70% of Christians supporting Bush and Americans are no longer victim of terrorist attack(which is probably untrue) doesn't make sense. Having Christians support him doesn't make him a great leader, it only means he's able to influence voter's decisions by citing the bible and play God's messenger.

Next you came up with the statistics of American casualties in Iraq, something about 1000 deaths not being alot for a war that went on for two years(it's actually 1.5 years). You know when people say war, I would think it would be two sides fighting with trained military personnels, not an established military with great firepower going to fights with those soldier-wannabe insurgents. Might as well say Japan was having a war with China a decade before WWII when the Japanese have taken complete control of its land and slaughtered 300k civilians. In response to your downplaying of accumulative casualties, 1000 is alot if all you're fighting are armed civilians. This isn't WWI where both sides are fairly even and neither the triple alliance or the triple entente(france, US and UK) was able to break through the opponent's trench defense. The U.S. clearly outnumbers and their military equipment cleary superior compared to Iraq, and you don't think 1k of deaths is alot? Now for my final note:

"First dude, bullshit. There were alot reports that Al Queda were in part responsible for the 9-11 attacks."

Since it is blatantly obvious that Al Qaeda IS responsible, I'd guess you're saying Iraq. I find it hard to believe anything Donald Rumsfeld says. Now they're pointing fingers at Iran. This blame game will never stop.

-- ubb (demonreaper73@hotmail.com), November 20, 2004.