Is a movement the Hollywood elite, celebrities, and other Democrats have pushed for quite awhile. Why is that? Could it be that they know that almost all uninformed dunderheads, numbskulls, douchebags, and ignoramouses too ill informed to even register will most likely always vote their way when put in the voting booth? Is this why that fat cunt Micheal Moore was given away free underwear and noodle soup to every student that registered? I wonder what party he thinks douchebags to ignorant to register would vote for? He is fat with a high voice, I don't wonder about noodle beyond his underwear!

By repeatidly saying that this is the most important election I think that these Demoncrats scared middle America into thinking the dunderheads and dingbats would decide the election for them. Is there anything Democrats cannot fuckup besides over pissing away our money, and badly experimenting with society!

-- Shane McShame (mcshame@yahoo.com), November 11, 2004

Answers

It was the largest turnout in history. Bush got the largest porality (over 3 million votes) in any Presidential election ever!

-- (mcshame@yahoo.com), November 11, 2004.

*plurality

-- (mcshame@yahoo.com), November 11, 2004.

Twice as many young people voted for kerry instead of bush, people in every other age group was a stupid kunt and voted for bush.. go here http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/4/191246/507

-- X (FULOSHT@TEK.COM), November 11, 2004.

By repeatidly saying that this is the most important election I think that these Demoncrats scared middle America into thinking the dunderheads and dingbats would decide the election for them. Is there anything Democrats cannot fuckup besides over pissing away our money, and badly experimenting with society!

I like the "badly experimenting with society part". You'r right, we shouldn't change a damn thing, we should definitely let Bush obliterate the environment and civil rights, experimentation is for pussies! And next time, try to organize your dumbass thoughts into one post.

-- U msut Feers Me (Dubyalovesblow00@hotmail.com), November 11, 2004.

So twice as many young people voted for Kerry as Bush? Why would informed voters need to be told to register, and on what day it's on?

And no little dickhead we should change things. We can start by cutting down on the massive washington establishement that is grown and kept breathing by the Democratic party. They are the "establishment"

And very true Shane. You can fool some of the people some of the time... I suppose not all the voting public is dumb and marginal as the Democrats estimate them to be. Just their voting base.

-- W (wwils12@netzero.com), November 27, 2004.

So twice as many young people voted for Kerry as Bush? Why would informed voters need to be told to register, and on what day it's on?

And no little dickhead we should change things. We can start by cutting down on the massive washington establishement that is grown and kept breathing by the Democratic party. They are the "establishment"

And very true Shane. You can fool some of the people some of the time... I suppose not all the voting public is dumb and misinformed as the Democrats estimate them to be. Just their voting base.

-- W (wwils12@netzero.com), November 27, 2004.

Yeah, the Democratic Party is the establishment. So what if they don't control the Supreme Court, the Senate, the House, or the Presidency. I'm sure they're still running things somehow! Those sinister Democrats!

Let me ask you something: has the size of the federal government increased or decreased since Clinton left office? Are your civil liberties more or less secure? Is there more or less bureaucracy?

-- Anti-bush (Comrade_bleh@hotmail.com), November 27, 2004.

Yeah, the Democratic Party is the establishment. So what if they don't control the Supreme Court, the Senate, the House, or the Presidency. I'm sure they're still running things somehow! Those sinister Democrats! The many bueracracies they built up as 40 years in Congress are still very present. Their agenda has been to filabuster every prososal the Republicans come up with. I think this is part of the reason they did badly this election. If we get a few to play along we will see a shrinking in the establshment.

First the Republicans want to cut everything, and leave so many poor helpless bums and buaricrats alone without a free meal ticket. Then not enough. Which is it? Which ever sounds good at the time. Let me ask you something: has the size of the federal government increased or decreased since Clinton left office? Are your civil liberties more or less secure? Is there more or less bureaucracy?

The federal governtment has increased since 9/11 because we have had to add to the defense department, which are the only real cuts Clinton proposed. But it is smaller now, then when he was in office with a Democratic Congress. The government only sharnk because of Republican proposed bills. This country is safter then when he was in office. He could not keep anything or anyone in check. There is more bueracracy because in order for the Republicans to get more in homeland security and the defense department they had to agree to add ons in other departments and pork barrel programs. The Democrats have also had a Agenda to block all Republican proposals to shrink the government since Bush got in. But I think that will change now that mroe of them are out.

Oh and the media, most of the college facilties, Hollywood, and attorneys who have been able to write 8,000 new laws for every one passed by Congress are Democrats.

It's strange. Are you saying The Republicans who took Congress in 94 wanted to shrink the government, but now under Bush they want to increase it, and all the social programs? If Bush is such a liberal pushover why call yourself that? Are you a "Democratic socialist" who is for less government? Or just another full of shit democrat?

-- W (wwils12@netzero.com), November 28, 2004.