What were you thinking!!!!!greenspun.com : LUSENET : Michael Jackson : One Thread
This e-mail is in response to the little boy that Michael Jackson put over the railing of the 4th floor. I would like to know WHAT THE HELL WAS HE THINKING?????? I think that CHILD ENDANGERMENT charges should be filed. Did he realize how scared HIS son was. Not to mention putting a rag over the baby's head. I know that he is a pop star. But micheal you have problems. Why are you trying to change how GOD made you so badly??? You need help!!!! That child was so afraid, if you do not think so look at the video and see his little hands. He was afraid!! Do fans mean that much to you that you would put your childs life & safety in jeopardy. I am very enraged about this as well as alot of other people. I question you need for children. I do not like to judge people. But being a child of sexual abuse, I wonder if michael needs help. First of all he shouldn't have been in the bed with a younger child. He is an adult and he could afford the whole hotel if he needs. Don't sleep in the bed with other peoples children!!!! I hope that your children will grow up and not be sexually abused by their own father or have their safety and life in jeoparedy because of the so called fans. You are sick!!!! If you have a problem with this e-mail you can get in touch with me at firstname.lastname@example.org. I am sure that you are going to get a lot of response to what was shown on TV. I really pray that you will get some help. See money can't buy everything. BRAINS!!!
-- Anonymous, November 20, 2002
he wasn't trying to harm the baby. the fans wanted to see him so he was nice enough to do so. Most superstars could care less. He wouldn't kill his own child, he wants the best for her or him. The baby couldn't even see what was going on, there was a towel over its head. And like Michael said on the documentary said, when he lets a child sleep in his bed, he sleeps on the floor. You don't live in house so you don't know what really happened. He doesn't need help or have to prove anything to anyone. If he was so bad to his kids then why did the mothers leave them with him? Because they trust him. Tabloids and lots of journalists are really jealous that they don't have as much fame and fortune. By the way, how old are you Debra? i am 13 years old and have sense enough to see through ignorance. Hope that you will too. Thanks for reading.
-- Anonymous, September 12, 2003
The real plain and simple answer about m jerkson is that his face is an ungodly freaky mess. He poured a fortune in to his face and if spent wisely and not selfishly it could have save thousands of lives in small starving countries around the world. Instead it went to very greedy so called doctors who were all to happy to mess up his face and keep messing it up until micheal finally realizes he will never look unfreaky again! He had the gall to be sooo selfish as to take what beauty God HAD given him and rape the beauty from his face and turn it into something unnatural. And I should think that even God himself would weep and use his face as a lesson of woe to those contemplating the same procedure(s)! He WAS black for Heaven’s sake!!!!
You know, I see his music on TV and it so not too bad (self- proclaimed king of POP… yeah right what ever) But… I will not change the channel. I see his moves on TV and they are pretty darn good!... I will not change the channel. I see his timing on TV and they are Perfect!!... I will not change the channel. But I see his face thrusted into a close up on my TV and it is like I am being forced to look at some kind of unnatural disaster… It is such an eyesore! I cannot stand it, it is some kind of visual pollution that I wish I could do something about it but cannot EXCEPT… … I can and WILL change the channel!! And dread the next time he will be on TV.
But still I do know God loves him! and millions do, maybe they are gifted with the gift of blindness or something and can see with their hearts… (?) but I would rather leave unclean things alone and a known child abuser is very unclean!
Deksam out. 12/ 21/02
-- Anonymous, December 21, 2002