Cat's control us?????greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News - Homefront Preparations : One Thread
Fisher posted this at TB2k...and thought Git would appreciate it, as well as a few others!!! heheheh they fact is...it's true!! mine all have their own "cat speak" and I usually know what each one means!
Cats Learn To Manipulate Their Human Owners [Fair use for educational/discussion purposes] http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sc...000/2001913.stm
By Helen Briggs BBC News Online science reporter
Anyone who has ever owned a cat will know that there is no limit to feline charm.
But now a US psychologist has come up with evidence that nature is giving a helping hand.
Nicholas Nicastro, of Cornell University, believes moggies are evolving into supercats that are better able to exploit humans.
He says cats have learned what buttons to press to please their owners after 5,000 years of living with us. Apparently, it is all down to the miaows they choose to get what they want.
The rewards are clear - more pampering, tastier food and a seat in the comfiest chair. But not all scientists are convinced.
Dr John Bradshaw of Southampton University, UK, says there is no doubt that cats are good at handling humans. But he says there is no evidence to suggest that artificial selection is taking place.
The term was coined by Charles Darwin to explain how man has shaped plants, crops and domestic animals by selective breeding.
"Cats learn to miaow in ways that manipulate their owners but it's got nothing to do with evolution at all - it's a learned response," says Dr Bradshaw, an animal behaviourist.
Many cats seem to have a set of miaows they use for different contexts, he says.
For example, a cat might choose a particular noise to signal it wants to be let out and a different one to demand to be fed.
But when you compare cats, there is nothing in common between these miaows, he says.
This suggests that each cat learns how to get its owner's attention, something that is nothing to do with genetics.
"There's a much more plausible explanation," Dr Bradshaw told BBC News Online. "Each cat tends in its own lifetime to learn the noises that interest its owner."
The controversy arises from a Cornell University evolutionary psychology study.
Mr Nicastro, a graduate student, put together a sample of 100 different vocalisations from 12 cats.
He played the cat calls back to 26 human volunteers and asked them to rate each one for pleasantness and appeal.
The same set of sounds was played to a second group of volunteers who were asked to rate how urgent and demanding the miaows were.
Humans seem to be able to distinguish between longer, raucous miaows and softer, more pleasing ones.
An urgent or demanding call is "the kind we hear at 7 am when we walk into the kitchen and the cat wants to be fed," says Mr Nicastro.
"The cat isn't forming sentences and saying, specifically, 'take a can of food out of the cupboard, run the can opener and fill my bowl immediately', but we get the message from the quality of the vocalisation and the context in which it is heard," he adds.
Mr Nicastro, who owns two cats, goes further. He says the pleasant sound is the one a cat might use, say in a rescue centre, to ask to be taken home. More demanding calls could cause a feline to be left behind to face an uncertain fate.
The psychologist says humans have long been selecting for the most pleasant sounding cats.
"Seven thousand years ago, when we think the ancestors of our domesticated cats began wandering into Egyptian granaries and offering to trade rodent-control services for shelter, it was probably the pleasant-sounding cats that were selected and accepted into human society," he says.
It is this point that is the bone of contention for Dr Bradshaw. He says for moggies at least, breeding is not under human control.
Although it might be possible to select for certain vocal abilities in pedigree cats, there is no evidence that this is actually happening.
"In ordinary domestic moggies, they go out and select their own mates," he told BBC News Online.
"The idea that a female would go up to a male in a back alley somewhere and say, 'could I hear your miaow to see if the kittens you father will be appealing to people', couldn't happen. Cats don't have that level of communication."
But that conclusion is unlikely to satisfy Mr Nicastro. "Cats are domesticated animals that have learned what levers to push, what sounds to make to manage our emotions," he says. "And when we respond, we too are domesticated animals."
-- Anonymous, May 27, 2002
After 19 years, my first cat, Boomer, had a pretty good grasp of my vocabulary. So, it was quite a setback when I first got Ginger and Bandit. Especially, Ginger because she seemed so bright. Then I realized Ginger knew perfectly well what I was talking about, but was determined to demonstrate how thoroughly she could ignore me!
"And when we respond, we too are domesticated animals." I thought we were "staff"...
-- Anonymous, May 28, 2002
I have to say it must be individual. Ginger has a yowl that would crack glass if allowed to go on for very long. Polly gets in Sweetie's fully-tiled shower and yowls where the acoustics rival the Vienna Opera House. Zucco is learning to yowl like Ginger. The others are lazy and know th yowlers will demand for them. Polly cerainly didn't demand like this when the former Chief Demander, Sooty, was alive.
Yes, we most definitely are staff.
-- Anonymous, May 30, 2002