Which Softar?greenspun.com : LUSENET : Large format photography : One Thread
I'm sitting here waiting for some computers to reboot, so I thought I'd ask a question! A local dealer has a special offer on Heliopan Zeiss Softar filters, and I thought I'd try one. I'd like to try it for some portraiture on 5x4" and 10x8" (platinum prints). I don't know whether to buy the Softar I or Softar II. Or both? Any opinions? If I like the soft focus effect, I might join the queue for the new Cooke portrait lens!
-- David Nash (firstname.lastname@example.org), May 22, 2002
Depends on the effect you want. I've found that most clients (wedding image buyers, usually brides & their moms) pick the Softar II images as preferable. If you're shooting LF, though, don't forget the softness & pleasant flare given by old uncoated lenses... have fun!
-- John Burke (email@example.com), May 23, 2002.
i'd take the camera and some film to his shop and try both. i personally own the softar I for my 6 by 7 camera setup. i find it sufficient so far.(no pun intended)
-- MILES FEIGENBAUM (firstname.lastname@example.org), May 23, 2002.
I too have the 1 and find it sufficient. The 2 to me is nice for a dreamy window light portrait but it is just a little to soft for me...
-- Scott Walton (email@example.com), May 24, 2002.