FWIW Vivid Light M7 Review

-- Brooks (Bvonarx@comcast.net), March 11, 2002

Answers

Thanks, Brooks.

Nice review!

-- Steve Hoffman (shoffman2@socal.rr.com), March 11, 2002.

I second the motion.

-- Frank Horn (owlhoot45@hotmail.com), March 11, 2002.

Agreed, it's a well-written review (pity he doesn't know the difference between its and it's!). The one on the M6 TTL is also worth a read - there's a link to the M6 TTL page on the M7 page.

-- Ray Moth (ray_moth@yahoo.com), March 11, 2002.

Ray Moth,

It's hard to tell whether the reviewer knows the difference between "its" and "it's" since in the M7 review he uses "its" correctly--there aren't any occurrences of "it's" in that review; it's in the M6 review where he uses "it's" for "its". I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and chalk up the M6 Review's use of "it's" to typographical error.

-- Cosmo Genovese (cosmo@rome.com), March 11, 2002.

Correct. I read both articles and forgot in which one I had seen "it's" used for "its". At least he didn't use "aperature" or "lense"! :-)

-- Ray Moth (ray_moth@yahoo.com), March 12, 2002.

At least there were no blunders with the latest craze of mauling the singular and plural of "criterion".

eg. One "criteria", two "criterions" or "criterias".

And recently things went the full circle with: One "criteria" and two "criterion".

"What has this to do with Leica?" You rightly ask. Well nothing really but I feel better now.

And thanks for the reference to the M7 review. I think Leica has balanced the "criteria(s)/criterion(s)" of what is needed brilliantly.

-- Tim Gee (twg@optushome.com.au), March 12, 2002.