NET USERS - Sociable and successful [except for one or two we know!]

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News - Homefront Preparations : One Thread

BBC - Net users 'sociable and successful' Successful and community-minded: Recognise yourself?

Internet users do not deserve their reputation for being socially inadequate loners, a study has found.

Despite jibes that computer users meet their friends online, researchers say they are actually more likely to be sociable and community minded.

Professor Andrew Oswald and Dr Jonathan Gardner, from the University of Warwick, found that people who regularly used the internet were also more likely to be better educated and to earn more.

Mr Oswald told the BBC: "This research should be very useful in overturning some common stereotypes.

"We discovered internet users are better citizens and more likely to be members of community groups and voluntary organisations.

"It appears the web is helping to strengthen the quality of British society.

"Internet users are the best citizens not the worst."

The professors concluded that internet users were sociable after discovering that 30% belonged to a community group, compared to less than a quarter of non-users.

People who went online regularly were also 50% more likely to be regular church-goers and were more trusting than average.

Graduates

The amount of time spent on the internet was also a good indicator of earnings.

Almost two thirds of people taking home more than £32,000 a year use the internet, compared with just 9% of those earning between £6,000 and £12,000.

More than seven out of 10 graduates use the web, but only one in 10 people with no qualifications do so.

The study also discovered that 40% of men use the internet, compared with 28% of women.

Men spent an average of 3.5 hours a week online, compared with 2.5 hours for women.

The findings will be published later this week in the 18th British Social Attitudes report.

-- Anonymous, November 25, 2001

Answers

>More than seven out of 10 graduates use the web, but only one in 10 people with no qualifications do so.

I think that was true in the US before about 1994 or so. Then AOL started sending cartons of disks with "free time" on them to everyone who might have a computer. Add to that the wide use of the GUI Browser, and suddenly, many of the general b. boards in the newsgroups were filled with spam, unfounded rumors, and posts full of bad logic and poor spelling. I was moderating a ham radio board and went from deleting an off-topic post once a month to dozens each day. The early XXX ads posters and "Make Money with Your Computer" spammers were the worst offenders.

This is why today I turn the kind offers to become a moderator on internet forums. It's nothing like it used to be, and I have the greatest respect for today's mods. That's not to say that we never had flame-wars, we did, but there just wasn't on-going garbage wars. A good example is the troublemaker(s) on RAL's forum yesterday and at Unk's open forum for about the past 5 weeks. That wasn't as much of a problem in the past because the people online had many other concerns beyond the interactions on forums.

-- Anonymous, November 25, 2001


Moderation questions? read the FAQ