Bottom			Middle			Top
Manager	Season	Won	Drawn	Lost	Won	Drawn	Lost	Won	Drawn	Lost
Keegan	1993-94	7	2	3	12	1	5	4	5	3
Keegan	1994-95	8	3	1	11	3	4	1	6	5
Keegan	1995-96	10	1	1	8	4	2	6	1	5
Keegan	1996-97	2	1	2	7	1	2	2	2	2
Dalglish	1996-97	4	2	1	2	2	0	2	2	1
Dalglish	1997-98	5	3	4	5	5	4	1	3	8
Gullit	1998-99	6	4	1	3	5	5	2	2	7
Robson	1999-00	6	2	2	5	4	3	3	3	4
Robson	2000-01	6	2	4	4	4	6	4	3	5
		Bottom			Middle			Top
Manager	Season	Won	Drawn	Lost	Won	Drawn	Lost	Won	Drawn	Lost
Keegan	1993-94	58%	17%	25%	67%	6%	28%	33%	42%	25%
Keegan	1994-95	67%	25%	8%	61%	17%	22%	8%	50%	42%
Keegan	1995-96	83%	8%	8%	57%	29%	14%	50%	8%	42%
Keegan	1996-97	40%	20%	40%	70%	10%	20%	33%	33%	33%
Dalglish	1996-97	57%	29%	14%	50%	50%	0%	40%	40%	20%
Dalglish	1997-98	42%	25%	33%	36%	36%	29%	8%	25%	67%
Gullit	1998-99	55%	36%	9%	23%	38%	38%	18%	18%	64%
Robson	1999-00	60%	20%	20%	42%	33%	25%	30%	30%	40%
Robson	2000-01	50%	17%	33%	29%	29%	43%	33%	25%	42%

 

Manager	Season	Bottom	Middle	Top
Keegan	1993-94	1.92	2.06	1.42
Keegan	1994-95	2.25	2.00	0.75
Keegan	1995-96	2.58	2.00	1.58
Keegan	1996-97	1.40	2.20	1.33
Dalglish	1996-97	2.00	2.00	1.60
Dalglish	1997-98	1.50	1.43	0.50
Gullit	1998-99	2.00	1.08	0.73
Robson	1999-00	2.00	1.58	1.20
Robson	2000-01	1.67	1.14	1.25

-- Anonymous, October 18, 2001

Answers

Hopefully that's all self-explanatory. The mini-table shows the average points scored by each manager against the relevant standard of competition each season.

-- Anonymous, October 18, 2001

Softie, Any chance you can extend your mini table to show the actual number of game the manager was in charge of? Purely for the simple of mind or inebriated - or both, in my case??

-- Anonymous, October 18, 2001

Also is there any chance you could crossreference each managers success against their height and weight. I think that KK was a bit of a shortarse, perhaps this may have had an influence on his early success and sudden demise (see: Napoleon complex)

-- Anonymous, October 19, 2001