I am sure many of you know of AbbyLane2001 over at the TB2K Forum and not to bother you all here but she has begun posting her bullshit here too. From where we stand we would all like to see her and the rest of the Bible bopping annoynces stopped.

They have made it so bad that people are scared to post for fear of the nasty "Christian" response they might get. If you disagree with her you are wrong and nuts and a sheep. Well Abby it does not work that way. We know most of your "Stories" are nothing more than paranoid bullcrap ripped off Usenet and We dont want it anymore.

Dennis has said that ignore works. If many ignored all the people with sticks up asses the board would appear blank to us.

Let it end.

PLEASE.

Let us all be able to exchange information with out fear of a flame from Abby or one of her bible boppers please. We like the boards here and dont want to leave.

-- TB2K_IS_BURNING (yeah@its-fake.org), August 14, 2001

Answers

Bring that stupid bitch on!!! She will discover that the WWW is no place for bible thumping fools. Fools perhaps, but not the bible thumping variety.

-- All (liberals(and freaks)@must.die), August 14, 2001.

-- TB2K_IS_BURNING (yeah@its-fake.org)

I dare you to post this same message over at TitsButts2K Forum. Your free to do this you know at "Take it Outside." Whatcha afraid of?

-- let's get it on (let'sgetiton@getiton.on), August 14, 2001.

You would not BELIEVE how sensitive they are over there about Bush's IQ (or rather lack of). At least two threads locked last week by morons over there who look up to him. Gun-toting bible-thumping double-digit-IQ dimwits.

-- Imbecile-in-Chief (duh@duh.duhhh), August 15, 2001.

Is AbbeyLane the twin sister of Ladyillogic?

-- @@@@@ (#####@xxxx.xxx), August 15, 2001.

First, the premise that AbbyLane is killing TB2K is bull. Rave on however you wish, but it's bull.

Second, the Bush "IQ" posts were locked because:

1) There were no actual "IQ tests" done. The "estimates" were gleaned from the writings of the politicians. (Since we all know that politicians write ALL their own material, that test was assured of being accurate... right?)

2) The "test" was administered by a far-left-wing organization

3) The results were published in PRAVDA, and we KNOW how Russia admires Bush

Yup. No reason to lock those threads. No-sirreee bob.

Personally, I can't stand the guy. (IMHO, Bush Jr. had ONE saving grace; that he kept algwhore outta the WH.) But absolute trash "science" like that "report" is meaningless. The discussion of trash science results are just as meaningless. Why bother? You wanna bash the little shrub, that's cool with me. You have an entire forum with many radical left-wingers over here to preach to. Just don't come over and waste MY bandwidth doing it. YOURS is free. Mine costs.

Now, feel free to rave on. I'm sure Phil Greenspun doesn't mind haveing HIS bandwidth wasted. After all, it's our tax dollars paying for it.

TB2K is "home" for a large number of folks. What we post (or don't post) should not concern you over here. If some of you want to spend your lives obsessing over a board that means nothing to you... well, I can't stop you. But might I suggest that you get a life and move on. TB2K will be around until the last member turns off the light. Might as well learn to live with it...

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 15, 2001.

Call it what you wish Mr. Olson but in any language it means ‘censorship’. As you have stated, it’s YOUR bandwidth to control as YOU please so play away. I suspect that the freedom allowed on this forum will outlive your little fiefdom, unless you are willing to pay for the privilege of talking to yourself.

I’m constantly at odds with the far-left folks but they are most preferable to your brand of selective allowances. Besides, I watched your act in 1999 and I wouldn’t trust you with the keys to anything.

Rave on.

-- So (cr@t.es), August 15, 2001.

To the best of my recollection, in the four months that I've been the Admin of TB2K, I've locked THREE posts due to content. Two of the ones on Bushie, and one raving tinfoil post that went nowhere, and had been postd many times in the past, on multiple fora. I've locked another couple that had turned into flame-wars and bash-fests (perhaps as many as four). I've DELETED precisely ZERO.

I highly suspect that many more deletions have been done here on Unk's. I think that before you cry "censoship" (usually the battle cry of little children who cannot act with any measure of self- control or decorum), I suggest you examine THIS place for those same flaws...

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 15, 2001.

You have an entire forum with many radical left-wingers over here to preach to.

I thought *I* was the only radical left-winger. I must have missed another memo.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), August 15, 2001.

This isn't the real Dennis Olson. Dennis Olson shouted long and loud about how he doesn't ever read this forum and has promised several times that he would never post over here again. And we all know what a promise from Dennis Olson is worth.

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), August 15, 2001.

hey, my ass itches, would one of you morons mind coming over and scratching it for me??

-- Horny (rump_rangers@work.com), August 15, 2001.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/2000/y2k/jan00/survive02010100.asp

-- Back (to@the.future), August 15, 2001.

Yeah... fuck all of you.. you want to trash abby try doing it on the board she posts on you spinless liberal cowards. People like you left wing sheep make me ill. Try and buy a fucking brain and stop bashing people who have ten times the brains you fuckkos will ever have.

Personaly I dare you idiots to try and troll tb2k, come on idiots even that fucking cunt of Cherri would get eaten alive.

-- Youareallidiots (your@mamma.com), August 15, 2001.

delete

-- Jack Booted Thug (governmentconspiracy@NWO.com), August 15, 2001.

Is AbbeyLane the twin sister of Ladyillogic, and is Dennis Olsen her brother?

-- @@@@ (#####@xxxx.xxx), August 15, 2001.

I come over here for the laughs. Dennis has been a lot better than the poorly worded mindlessly profane stuff I see in this thread. He is also a lot better than the old boards and their rather strict censorship and control. Abby posts what she wants to just like the rest of us and she takes her abuse because of it just like the rest of us. Over there I'm ALF. Come on a join us if you can be civil and discuss the issue and not the person raising it.

-- Just Passin Through (Nobody@nowhere.com), August 15, 2001.

You Timebomb repugs can eat shit and die. Fuckin repugs!

-- Tony Baloney (Fuck the@repugs.com), August 15, 2001.

Um, I'm a lifelong DemocRAT.

(Another raving libbie theory bites the dust...)

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 15, 2001.

One too many tonight, dear?

-- Yeah it's her (Hello@Sumer.hello), August 16, 2001.

Hey Anita, I'm in your corner!

It's just that I normally don't waste my time arguing the same old stuff with conservatives. Life is too short, there are better ways to use my energy.

As for Abby, her paranoid ravings and loony links have a certain entertainment value (this is a museum-quality worldview she has, it must be preserved for science), but I (and anyone else) can just as well go over to TB2k to read them there, without cluttering up this board and getting more heat than light produced by the grumbling. It's a bandwidth issue, and a matter of keeping the tone a bit more constructive.

-- Firemouse (yippie@bolshevik.scum), August 16, 2001.

See Anita, don't be so smug. You are not the only leftie here. There is Firemousie, Cherri, LN, the ghost of FS, the scumster and Tony fucking Baloney. A virtual coffee clatch (sp ?)!

-- Lars (larsguy@yahoo.com), August 16, 2001.

I forgot Debra. Sorry Debra.

-- Lars (larsguy@yahoo.com), August 16, 2001.

Olson said:

"But absolute trash "science" like that "report" is meaningless."

. Please Dennis - your entire forum is filled with nonsense like "Poison Contrails" and "UN invasions" - all gleaned from the most spurious of sources.

"Junk science" is what most of the content of your forum is based on. Here in Atlanta we just call that "junk"....

-- Y2K Pro (y2kpro1@hotmail.com), August 16, 2001.

Yes Pro, there is a bunch of that. There is ALSO a bunch of good, hard mainstream news. You know that's true, because you're a registered member, and have posted there as well.

So, if you're going to make statements about the place, the very least you can do is endeavor to be more accurate.

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

Dennis:

While hard news stories are posted, the ones that attract the most interest from your forum members are the "tinfoil hat" type. It seems odd to lock up a thread beause of junk science and then let abbylane2001, Mountain Mike and the cascadians prattle on endlessly about this weeks loony-tune conspiracy(comets hitting the earth, Russian troops in Oregon, Martial law,UN highway signs, etc) ...

I don't believe I belong to the new forum - folks made it clear they weren't interested in opinions that diverged from the "things are really, really bad" doomer fantasies that they surround themselves with.

-- Y2K Pro (y2kpro1@hotmail.com), August 16, 2001.

‘Cascadians’?

Are those two freaks still out there (no pun intended? That’s where the ‘mainstream’ news is coming from?

TOO FUCKING FUUNY!!!

-- All (liberals(and freaks)@must.die), August 16, 2001.

I'm sorry Pro. Did I "out" you? (snicker)

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

Oh, and my periodic perusal of THIS place doesn't exactly show me a site full of shining examples of mainstream "news". Just look at your main page for TODAY, and you can find all the "tinfoil" stuff you want. Just a different KIND of tinfoil news, but definitely tinfoil nonetheless...

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

So then lard-ass, why are you spending so much time over here, taking up our precious bandwidth?

-- All (liberals@must.die), August 16, 2001.

Oooh, "lardass". Did you just make that up? How frickin original. But now that you've demonstrated your debating ability, I have a news flash for ya. This isn't YOUR bandwidth. It's Greenspun's Bandwidth. It's the PUBLIC'S bandwidth. And as a bona fide member of the "public", I can post all I want to.

My statement above still stands re the "quality" of the material on this board. I notice you had nothing to say on that point....

Got your tinfoil hat on big boy?

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

J,

Question for you? If you you deplore the type of behavior exhibited here and will not allow it on your forum, why do you come over here and get into it with people? Do you find it more entertaining or what? I understand that you might feel some folks are putting your friends or your forum down and you would want to defend them but you seem to enjoy this give and take so much I don't understand why it is forbidden on your forum.

Straighten my Tinfoil hat for me will you?

-- Jack Booted Thug (governmentconspiracy@NWO.com), August 16, 2001.

Okay, it's like this. This entire thread is a slam to a TB2K member AND the TB2K board. We have worked very hard to make TB2K a decent place for old friends to hang out and discuss "whatever". (When someone from TB2K started spamming Unks, I even asked them to stop doing so.) One this thread, I have not flamed anyone, nor have I spammed this board.

But I have been called several names (again for SPORT). I find that kind of behavior childish. I also didn't care for some here saying that TB2K posted *just* tinfoil threads. I am merely pointing out that the tinfoil stuff, as well as the censorship, exist on this forum to at least an equal amount to that in TB2K.

I feel it unreasonable and unfair to characterize my board in the terms it has been on this thread. I didn't START the thread, but I think I have the right to rebut some of the crap on it.

That help a bit...?

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

JBT: You REALLY need to engage in the Bart Simpson sortof punishment and write on the blackboard 50 times: "J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis."

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), August 16, 2001.

BTW, the "give and take" are not *forbidden*. It just need to be kept civil, unless it's in the "Take it Outside SIG", where anything goes (as in pretty much unmoderated). Many, if not most, of the membership does not appreciate juvenile behavior and needless profanity. My staff and I work to provide them with such an environment.

-- Dennis Olson (djolson@pressenter.com), August 16, 2001.

“Many, if not most, of the membership does not appreciate juvenile behavior and needless profanity. My staff and I work to provide them with such an environment.”

Oh stop, you’re killing me!

Most of your ‘membership’, ‘staff’, and especially ‘you’ are a bunch of foam-at-the-mouth loonies. Take your bullshit somewhere else Olson, you are too well known over here.

-- Dennis ('need@baby'.Olson), August 16, 2001.

You fuckers are a riot. Left wing wakkos calling tb2k users foam at the mouth wakkos? You mother fuckers cant even look at a pic of Bush witout making up some bullshit about him.. some lie some other crap.

Give it a rest assholes. Keep your fucking heads in the sand. you will be the first assholes looking for a gubmint handout after the bomb hits dirtbags.

-- hahah@sexyfun.com (haha@haha.com), August 17, 2001.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

J is NOT Dennis. J is NOT Dennis.

Sorry Anita, some habits are hard to break. But if he ISN'T J then why did he answer me? I know, I know, 100 times this time right?

-- Jack Booted Thug (governmentconspiracy@NWO.com), August 17, 2001.

"I'm sorry Pro. Did I "out" you? (snicker)"

"Out" me from what? That I once played in your little garden of paranoia? Guilty as charged...

p.s. Guess who was 100% correct about Y2K? Me or any of the blathering half-wits who make up your little forum? (snicker)

-- Y2K Pro (y2kpro1@hotmail.com), August 17, 2001.