#2 Halifax plc And Warner Cranston Reed Smithgreenspun.com : LUSENET : Repossession : One Thread
unfortunatly the sale was in august 95 so i was within the six years when they re-contacted me, I keep asking about the MIG and what is the "real" amount of shortfall but the keep saying I am not Privy or party to this and under rights of subrogation they can ask for all of shortfall regardless of MIG - is this right?
-- darren law (firstname.lastname@example.org), August 07, 2001
um, this may be a stupid question Darren, but are they WRITING to you or TALKING to you. If talking, stop now. start getting things in writing.
Re the MIG, its a moot point and some contributors have had success with this, others not. If I went to court I would argue that the payout was relevant because of, well lots of things, look through the previous answers on this.
-- (email@example.com), August 14, 2001.