SHT - Neglected computers hamper FBI

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Current News : One Thread

Chic Trib

Neglected computers hamper FBI Ancient systems slow investigations

By Naftali Bendavid Washington Bureau Published August 6, 2001

WASHINGTON -- FBI agents, members of the world's top law-enforcement agency, cannot send e-mail outside the bureau from their own computers. They cannot access the Internet from their desks, use current software programs or even connect to the FBI's own databases.

Robert Mueller, who was confirmed by the Senate last week as the next FBI director, must address the aftermath of headline-grabbing debacles such as the Robert Hanssen spy case. But an equal challenge will be repairing an aging computer system that has been neglected for years.

Throughout the bureau's 700 offices, investigations are routinely slowed, and crucial information missed, while data is downloaded on these ancient systems, insiders say. Processes that many teenagers could perform at home in minutes take the nation's top investigators hours.

"The average person in America would think the FBI, as the premier law-enforcement agency, would have top-of-the-shelf automation, but they are far from it," said William Esposito, the bureau's deputy director in the late 1990s. "The system definitely needed upgrading and it was a frustration on the part of a lot of people, at both management level and agent level, as to why this could not happen sooner and faster."

The ailing computer system is more than an inconvenience. Better automation could have avoided such recent FBI embarrassments as the loss of hundreds of guns and laptop computers and the mishandling of documents that delayed the execution of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, experts say.

Some critics even assert that the FBI could have caught Hanssen earlier if its computer system had been better designed. On a daily basis, investigators clearly could complete far more investigations if their computers worked faster, and agents say they find themselves going to stakeouts or interviews without crucial information.

"Not every agent has access to an Internet terminal," said Nancy Savage, president of the FBI Agents Association. "Some of our smaller offices don't even have Internet access. We don't always have the ability to transfer photographs. Those kinds of things are basic to law enforcement now."

Bureau leaders concede there are numerous computer problems, but say they are working hard to fix them.

Mueller said at his confirmation hearing last week that he is determined to bring the FBI up to speed technologically.

Bob Dies, a 30-year veteran of IBM, was brought in a year ago to renovate the bureau's computer systems. But Dies said the FBI is so far behind that even when his upgrading is finished in two years, its technology will not approach the level taken for granted by most companies.

The neglect of the FBI's computers can be traced to several factors, according to knowledgeable observers inside and outside the bureau.

The FBI certainly has not suffered from a lack of funds; its budget has exploded to $3.4 billion from $2 billion in 1994.

But the money has gone to flashier causes, such as operating more than 40 FBI offices overseas--19 of which have opened in the last five years--rather than the mundane work of upgrading computers.

Some say Congress has not allocated enough money for technology. Others say it did, but the FBI had to divert the money to costly, high-profile investigations.

Technology a low priority

Former FBI Director Louis Freeh and his lieutenants clearly placed little priority on technology until it threatened to erupt into a crisis. Computer specialists inside the FBI aggravated the problem by being slow to bring problems to Freeh's attention, said current and former agents.

"There is absolutely no reason for this," said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"The FBI has had an extraordinary increase in its budget. It's a lack of management. It's an attitude of some that `We are the FBI and we have done it in this way for a long time, and this is how we are going to do it,'" Leahy said.

Dies said he is appalled at the state of the bureau's technology. "The [agents] are better than I thought," Dies said. "The technology, on the other hand, is worse than I thought. And I had a very low expectation level."

He cited one FBI satellite office with 30 employees that is connected to the outside world with a single, slow computer line.

Dies persuaded Congress last fall to allocate $300 million to upgrade the FBI's computers, networks and applications. While that should bring the bureau to a basic functioning level, Dies said, the FBI still lag will far behind the rest of the world.

"They have been starved for support for so long they don't know what to ask for," Dies said.

The bureau's computer networks are so bad, he said, that they are forcing the FBI to use primitive computer programs, because that is all they can support.

Primitive programs

When the typical agent turns on a computer, it displays not the multi-colored screen familiar to many--with its landscape of toolbars, boxes, browsers and icons--but a green-and-black screen that was obsolete a decade ago.

The FBI's internal system does not connect with the outside at all, which is why agents cannot access the Internet or send e-mail.

Most FBI offices do have a few separate computers that link with the outside, but they have to be shared. The 10 agents in the FBI's office in Eugene, Ore., for example, share a single e-mail account.

Robert Castelli, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said such problems are troubling.

As criminals become adept at using computers for embezzlement, pornography and other high-tech wrongdoing, it is essential for investigators to keep up, he said.

"We used to do this with paper and pencil, pocket calculators and slide rules," Castelli said.

"But crime is becoming more sophisticated, especially white-collar crime and computer crime, which is one of the largest growing areas of crime and one of the hardest to investigate. Therein lies the situation they are faced with."

-- Anonymous, August 06, 2001

Answers

It never fails to amaze me that governments and companies do not put in their budgets for upgrading systems. It should be there every year as a maintenance item. That way the top people (or programmers) get the new machines and their machines are moved to the next level, etc. If they do this every year they have pretty current technology.

-- Anonymous, August 06, 2001

"Some say Congress has not allocated enough money for technology. Others say it did, but the FBI had to divert the money to costly, high-profile investigations."

Some of those high-profile coverups, er..investigations, would probably include OKC, TWA, Waco, etc., etc. Glad to see our money so well spent.

-- Anonymous, August 06, 2001


Good grief. Synchronicity. Read the following passage on the way home tonight, about a CIA agent who is trying to track down some intelligence maps. He's just described his need. (The First Horsemen, by John Case, 1998)

"Oh, well," the woman said, perking up. "I don't think that should be a problem. Though if you want to know the truth, I think you could probably get what you want off the Internet."

I'm not ON the Internet," Fitch said.

"Well, you should be!"

"Not really: if I was, they'd have to kill me."

"What do you mean?"

"It's a security thing. None of the computers here are hooked up to phones."

"Well, just in case: we're at dubba-ya dubba-ya dybba-ya dot nima dot com." There was a pause. "Did you get that?" she asked.

"Yeah," Fitch replied. "I got it. But until I get hooked up, y'know, it's moot."

-- Anonymous, August 06, 2001


Processes that many teenagers could perform at home in minutes take the nation's top investigators hours.

I'm not sure if this is a compliment for the kids and their free-money parents, or a slight against computer-illiterate investigators. LOL

Maybe if they deleted all that pornography; you know, free up some drive space...

-- Anonymous, August 07, 2001


Moderation questions? read the FAQ