Her name is Cherri Stewart and she is a political psycho who spends all day every day ranting about President Bush on Pooles and Unk's Wild Wild West Internet Forums.

Close your eyes if you have a weak stomach!

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001

Answers

You agree to not use the Service to: a.upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful,harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar,obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

Kristofor M. Kocan is the President and Founder of Surfola.com. He can be contacted at kris@surfola.com

I think you gunna need a new paranoia service now dickhead.

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

Nice to see other veterans on this board stepping up for a fellow veteran here!

Fucking people make me hurl.

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

Are you out of your mind? Her stint in the military has nothing to do with it! Some one else posted that picture. I'm just expressing my opinion artistically, knothead. I'm tired of that left wing commie pinko! She is a disgrace to the United States military!!!!!!!!!!!

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

It seems to me that Cherri has a cyber-stalker. First there were the threads started about Cherri being obese. THEN, the stalker moved on to a thread about Cherri being psychotic. NOW, he/she has moved on to UGLY. I think it's pretty clear who has the obsession, and it surely isn't Cherri.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), June 02, 2001.

It seems to me you have a screw loose. A LOT of us don't like Cherri. SHE is the one who spams this forum all the time, not ME. Shall we count the number of her posts in the last week?

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

I don't see Cherri's posts as SPAM, just like I didn't see Ain'ts posts as spam, or the posts of Atheist Corner as spam, etc. YOU'RE in control of what you read and what you don't read. It's YOUR choice.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), June 02, 2001.

Here is the list of supposed spammers using your illogic...http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/statistics.tcl? topic=Unk%27s%20Wild%20Wild%20West

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

Nice trick!

Anyhow Kris been emailed, you done.

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

We'll let him decide, it ain't up to you. Until then I'm going to tell Cherri what I think of her _ and her politics _ and her spam _ and there's nothing you can do about it!!!!

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

Until then I'm going to tell Cherri what I think of her _ and her politics _ and her spam _ and there's nothing you can do about it!!!!

Why didn't you just do this? I disagree with Cherri all the time, but I don't start threads that take her picture and distort it and then claim that I've met the ugliest woman. This is a diverse forum. It always has been. We're ALL bound to disagree on some issues, but very few folks resort to the fat, ugly, psychotic methods that you chose to discredit the person who didn't agree with you. Most folks here can simply agree to disagree.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), June 02, 2001.

Goget, if you think that pissy little animated GIF is worth causing that kind of shit over, then you have lost the argument already.

What a whiny little moaner you are.

-- Chortle, chortle (laughing@your.worthless.ass), June 02, 2001.

Maybe somebody can explain the nice little redirect script then?

Somebody been hacked here. Unk, you got an explanation?

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

If you're talking about how my statistic post got before yours, I posted BEFORE you did. There is no redirect script. You must be related to Cherri to be that paranoid and stupid. No wonder people think vets are all basket cases. You and Cherri make great poster people.

Why didn't you just do this? I did. It's called artistic license. Just because this is a board where most people type doesn't mean we cant express ourselves with pictures too.

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

Care to explain the Babiesonline connection?

-- (goget@clue.net), June 02, 2001.

What strikes me as strange about Cherri's troll is that it persists in spite of the fact that Cherri could give a rat's ass one way or the other. It doesn't bother her (which is a very healthy attitude).

This puts the troll into a select group, motivated more by obsession with the subject than by a need for attention. That's kind of scary. This troll is a few quarts low on mental stability.

-- Little Nipper (canis@minor.net), June 02, 2001.

"motivated more by obsession with the subject than by a need for attention."

And this DOESN'T sound just like Cherri to you, LN?

-- Pot, Kettle, Black (just@keeping.you.honest), June 02, 2001.

Sounds like the same troll, only on to a different subject.

And then soon there will be someone or something else

Y A W N

-- (cin@cin.cin), June 02, 2001.

No wonder people think vets are all basket cases

Yes you are correct, both Bushes are basket cases.

-- (goodone@freaking.nazi), June 02, 2001.

Oh sure You'd like to know wouldn't you? Why should I bother telling YOU?You're a sniveling coward who like Cherri has nothing better to do than whine and cry 'foul'! 'I'm gunna tell on you'!

I bet your shirt sleeve is full of snot where you snivel and wipe.

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

She reminds me of the best lover I ever had, Granny from the Beverly Hillbillies. She had a nice dried-up pussy and tits that I could pull and twist in any direction, and she loved to fuck for hours on end. I wore her out though, and she is gone to that big bedroom in the sky, God rest her soul.

Please send this woman to me now, I have a feeling she might be as good as my Granny.

-- Jethro (hung like @ stud. horse), June 02, 2001.

I did. It's called artistic license. Just because this is a board where most people type doesn't mean we cant express ourselves with pictures too.

I understand the concept of artistic license, but I didn't see your distortion of Cherri's picture in that same vein. I'm no Samantha Waters, but it looks to me like you want to portray her as a fat, psychotic, ugly woman in the hopes that YOUR philosophy on whatever is seen as preferable because YOU are slim, mentally healthy, and seen as the epitome of beauty by all who look at you. You have no current data on her and no one here has ANY data on YOU, so you feel free to bastardize old data on HER to make your point.

Would you mind if I laughed at this point?

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), June 02, 2001.

Sure. go ahead if you want.

fat, psychotic, ugly woman But she is! She had never denied her fatness _ you can tell she's ugly from listening to her _ its obvious she's psychotic from the content and number of her posts!

because YOU are slim, mentally healthy, , and seen as the epitome of beauty by all who look at you. Handsome. The word is Handsome.

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

Why should Cherri deny ANYTHING? Do you not understand that most of the anonymous posts on this forum are simply bait, including yours? Most of us simply ignore the "baiting" posts. We also ignore the posts that claim peacock status. Oops...YOURS would be included in that one.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), June 02, 2001.

I love digging up these cockroaches. Me too. Particularly when their initials are DT and they work at HR2000.

-- (10.9.8@7.6), June 02, 2001.

.

-- trying (to_turn@off.tags), June 02, 2001.

My guess is that Cherri has attracted quite a few opponents and many are beginning to torment her in retaliation for her vitriolic spewing of anti-Bush/Republican rhetoric. She has reduced herself to ‘clown’ status and I suspect she is quite bothered by that. Only a person with extremely low self-esteem would spend so much time on an Internet forum in an attempt to massage their ego. She is undoubtedly a very lonely and sad person IRL and therefore it has become very important for her to ‘be’ someone, albeit in cyber space. Witness her claims of ‘flying’ all of the heavy metal so finely displayed in the images above. She may have been on these babies to do some tech work but ‘fly them’…. don’t think so. In the end, who cares?

-- Two (bit@head.case), June 03, 2001.

She has reduced herself to ‘clown’ status and I suspect she is quite bothered by that.

Nope.

Only a person with extremely low self-esteem would spend so much time on an Internet forum in an attempt to massage their ego.

Laugh, trying to use psychology, but what you said is not based on any thing more than your attempt to copy me and the things I wrote. Not only is your attempt a failure, but you have managed to insult a lot of people who enjoy posting on the forum by insinuating they have low self esteem for doing so.

She is undoubtedly a very lonely and sad person IRL

lonely, no, sad yep at times, but natural under the circumstances

and therefore it has become very important for her to ‘be’ someone, albeit in cyber space.

I am someone in real life, I don't have your ego hang-ups, you obsess about me, gotta wonder why?

Witness her claims of‘flying’ all of the heavy metal so finely displayed in the images above.

You don't comprehend very well do you? You haven't been around very long either, or you comprehend what I say above. After all, the picture you distorted is me in the pilots seat of a B-52. You think women cannot fly those aircraft? If so, why not?

She may have been on these babies to do some tech work but ‘fly them’…. don't think so.

And you thinking it makes it so right? And you attempt to promote the view that I have an ego problem?

In the end, who cares?

Obviously, you do, or you wouldn't continue to go on and on and on ragging about me. You have caused more positive feedback by forum readers than any thing I have ever written.

Can you answer a few questions? What is it inside of you that makes you so angry at me? Has a woman shown you up? Do you believe that women cannot be equal or better than you? What is it you want from me, an admission of inferiority? Are you so dependent on superficial attributes that it is beyond your comprehension that the majority of society does not? You go ahead and keep screaming your head off and bitching and moaning about me. It only makes me and the rest of the group laugh.



-- Cherri (jessam5@home.com), June 03, 2001.

You surely do have a major problem Cherri. My post above is the only one by me on this entire thread! You fail to realize what a fool you have become to many people.

I have no idea who posted the distorted picture of you but what has that got to do with you ‘Flying’ a B-52? Do you imagine us to be so stupid as to think an Air Force enlisted tech would fly military aircraft? There are hundreds of absolutely great female military pilots…..you just are not ONE OF THEM. This kind of fantasy self promotion just certifies how low you’re self-esteem must be.

I will admit to ‘obsessing’ over certain females but you are not on that planet. I’m just one person that reacts to your ridiculous rantings and you provide us all with endless opportunities.

This is an Internet forum Cherri, filled with people that will never be able to help you with your ‘real world’ problems. Hating all things ‘conservative’ will not change the fact that what you really hate….is yourself.

Seek professional help.

-- Two (bit@head.case), June 03, 2001.

Just FYI, 'Two', enlisted aircrew frequently get 'stick time' in Naval Avation. I can't say with certainty that this is so in the Air Force, but I can't imagine it not to be. It's a matter of self preservation and courtesy.

As for the 'head case' bit, that's pretty inconsistent with being aircrew in the military. Again, it's a matter of survival.

-- Hardliner (searcher@internet.com), June 03, 2001.

I'm still waiting for that beautiful woman who looks like my Granny to come over.

Please send her now. My horses, cows, and other animals are getting worn out.

-- Jethro Bodine (well hung @ and. ready for bung), June 03, 2001.

The spam insulting Cherri is much more annoying than the spam that was posted by Cherri in the first place.

-- jammy (jammin@with.jammy), June 03, 2001.

The thread with the most post is a trash thread. I just don't understand why people would even bother to respond to this. *sigh*

-- Maria (anon@ymous.com), June 04, 2001.

No, Maria, unless I miss my guess, the "thread with the most answers" is this one: Can your town be nuked?.

-- Little Nipper (canis@minor.net), June 04, 2001.