New porn regulations ala Bush administration

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Wild Wild West : One Thread

rules

For those of you unaware of the List put together by Attorney Paul Cambria here is it.

No facial cum shots; check for facial expressions- don't use any shots that depict any unhappiness or pain; no shots with an appearance of pain or degradation, body shots are okay if the shot is not nasty; no bukkake; no spitting or saliva mouth-to-mouth; no food used as a sex object; no peeing unless in a natural setting such as a field or roadside; no coffins; no blindfolds, no wax drippings; no two dicks in or near one mouth; no shot of stretching pussies; no fisting; no squirting; no bondage or bondage-type toys or gear unless very light; no girls sharing the same dildo in mouth or pussy; toys are okay if shot is not nasty; no hands from two different people fingering the same girl; no male-male penetration; no she-males; no bi-sex; no degrading dialogue, e.g. "suck this cock, bitch" while slapping her face with a penis; no menstruation topics; no incest topics; no forced sex, rape themes, etc., no black men/white women themes.

So far, among the companies that are going to adopt these guidelines are Vivid, Hustler, Video Team and VCA.

-- (control@freaks.noggin), April 17, 2001

Answers

Actually, these didn't come from the Bush administration. They came from one of the aforementioned video companies that got paranoid about possible crackdowns by the Bush administration. Check this article:

LINK

I certainly wouldn't put it past the Bush administration to think about cracking down on the porn industry, but keep in mind that he's already broken several campaign promises he made already, so he's certainly under no obligation to try anything. These porn companies are not only signing their own death warrants by this self-censorship (which will lead to lower sales and their ultimate demise), but they make a clear statement that they can be intimidated by even non-existent threats. If they truly cave in like this, then the industry as a whole will be easy prey by any government goon that wants to use these companies of examples of how the industry can be controlled.

They should all just keep doing what they've been doing and not get all paranoid. The Bush administration will have plenty of other things to worry about than a bunch of porn companies.

-- (xxx@xxx.xxx), April 18, 2001.


Why would we want it to go away?

-- (xxx@xxx.xxx), April 18, 2001.

no peeing unless in a natural setting such as a field or roadside

Guess they think the Bush administration considers peeing on the roadside normal behavior.

Gee, everyone afraid to use their normal name here? Don't want to admit they read the post on porn? *EG*

-- Cherri (jessam5@home.com), April 18, 2001.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ