Hard-Right Morons Fall for Lies and Propaganda

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Wild Wild West : One Thread

From the "Daily Howler"

17 February 2001

Smile-a-while: Those stubborn facts

Synopsis: Two Journal killjoys dug up some facts. The press corps knew what to do--it ignored them.

Hay-yo! Don Imus introduced him as "Chris Matthews Lite." But Mike Barnicle, new host of Hardball's second hour, offered his own self-assessment:

BARNICLE: Actually, Mr. Imus, I am MSNBC's answer to the best and the brightest. I am proving every night that there's a new show on MSNBC called "Dumb and Dumber."

Barnicle said it, we didn't. One thing is quite obvious, though--Barnicle has clearly stopped stealing from Carlin, or he'd have better jokes he could lead with. Right away, he went to the blue stuff:

BARNICLE (continuing directly): And I gotta tell ya, I am so up today! I can't believe how up I am.

How up was he? Let him continue:

BARNICLE (continuing directly): I woke up this morning, I went down and looked at the paper--Viacom's growth is greater than Clinton's penis!!

Hay-yo! We were a bit surprised to hear the joke, since we all know it isn't the sex, it's the lying. Apparently, Mike missed that memo:

BARNICLE: You know something, Chuck and Don? This leaves a stain on the presidency--

Note to readers: can you see it coming?

BARNICLE: --bigger than the stain on Monica Lewinsky's dress!

Hay-yo! "And it leaves it in the eyes of kids," Mike complained, at 7:30 A.M., without irony. Hay-yo! Who but the press corps churns out stuff like this? Although even we will have to admit it--if there's anyone who's equipped to speak for adolescent boys, it would have to be Hardball II sage Mike Barnicle.

What had Mike so all het up? He rattled some standard recitations:

IMUS: Don't you think that it's kind of remarkable that a former president, I mean, stole the furniture. I mean, he stole the furniture!

BARNICLE: Well not only stole the furniture—the silverware, the ashtrays, the lamps, stuffing everything in his pockets, couldn't get out of a metal detector on the way out of the White House!

Once again, we were a little surprised. After all, everyone knows, from the last election, how much Mike and Don--and their media friends--just hate all embellishing and embroidering.

In truth, of course, our celebrity pundits live to embellish--and to deep-six the facts they don't like. That's why we couldn't help chuckling, in the past week, as pundits ignored the Wall Street Journal's research into the Clintons' vile gifts. For several weeks, we heard pundits refer to the loot, the swag, the haul and the plunder. But last week, Jackie Calmes and Phil Kuntz reported some facts. Here's what the two killjoys said:

CALMES AND KUNTZ: A look at recent years' reports of presidential gifts indicates the Clintons' overall take during their term isn't greatly out of line with the two previous administrations.

Say what? What about the way they "stuffed everything in their pockets?" What about the "plunder" we'd heard described? Jackie and Phil did the numbers:

CALMES AND KUNTZ: President George H.W. Bush, Mr. Clinton's immediate predecessor, kept an average $39,614 worth of personal gifts a year in inflation adjusted dollars during his four years in office. Mr. Clinton took gifts valued at an average of $38,838 a year, adjusted for inflation: both took more than President Ronald Reagan.

So Bush took slightly more than Clinton--once someone did some reporting. We know of nothing wrong with that, but it sure did kill the impression we'd gotten from two solid weeks of Big Spinnin'. Maureen Dowd, for example, had done some Big Pimpin'--"Bill and Hill took enough loot to fill a small hotel," she wrote. Salon's Eric Boehlert has done excellent work about Dowd's endless factual errors. But we thought the info in the Journal added a little more context.

So here's our question, boys and girls. Ten days have passed since Calmes and Kuntz laid out the figures on the Clinton/Bush gifts. And can we make a simple guess, dear friends? Can we guess that you have never seen those facts cited anywhere else? Those facts went down the memory hole as fast as our spinners could flush them. Thursday morning, Barnicle continued to push the line that the Clintons had taken all they could grab. The Journal's facts provided some context—and that is why you won't see them repeated. Our press corps' spinners know this one thing--when the facts hurt your spin, you ignore them.

Did someone once talk about "stubborn" facts? Alas! When "stubborn" facts don't help tell their tale, our scribes dump the facts as fast as they can. Instead, they joke--about Clinton's big $%^&*. Are we sure that it wasn't the sex?

-- Coup2k (thanks@pubs!.com), February 21, 2001

Answers

****yawn****

-- Are you this boring in real life as well? (get@life.loser), February 21, 2001.

Good find Coup. Thank you for revealing this right wing propoganda.

-- (@ .), February 21, 2001.

BARNICLE (continuing directly): And I gotta tell ya, I am so up today! I can't believe how up I am.

How up was he? Let him continue:

BARNICLE (continuing directly): I woke up this morning, I went down and looked at the paper--Viacom's growth is greater than Clinton's penis!!

Hay-yo! We were a bit surprised to hear the joke, since we all know it isn't the sex, it's the lying. Apparently, Mike missed that memo:

BARNICLE: You know something, Chuck and Don? This leaves a stain on the presidency--

Note to readers: can you see it coming?

BARNICLE: --bigger than the stain on Monica Lewinsky's dress!

Hay-yo! "And it leaves it in the eyes of kids," Mike complained, at 7:30 A.M., without irony.

And Republicans are supposed to be the "family values" party!

-- Republican Sex Obsessions (dirty@minds.com), February 21, 2001.


Silly shit.

-- Carlos (riffraff@cybertime.net), February 22, 2001.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ