My man, Don Imus, describes Clinton as "The Fat Pantload". I would like to take a poll, as to which of the following listed alternatives people agree with:

1. Imus is too harsh 2. Imus is just right 3. Imus is not harsh enough

(Being a moderate myself, I choose #2, the middle way.)

-- Jason (smarter@than.bill), July 28, 2000

Answers

Jason,

With the "fat" part, aren't you giving old Billy Boy a little more credit than he needs? After all, he can be contained in a mouth.

-- (Comes@Around.InHere), July 28, 2000.

I think you misunderstood Don. It sounds like he was describing Rush Limbaugh.

-- jason (dumber@than.mule), July 28, 2000.

Hi there! I'm, like, this teenybopper, and I think this Imus is being way too hard on our President. Like in a few years I'm going to get to cast my first highly informed intelligent vote, and I'm going to vote for Mr. Clinton because he's so smart. I mean, you have to be real smart to invent a whole new game, like he did - swallow the leader.

-- Toots (Rootie@toot.toot), July 28, 2000.

The I-Man rules!

-- (nemesis@awol.com), July 29, 2000.

Not only is Jason dumber than a mule, he's slower than a tortoise. Don't you know that making fun of Clinton was the big fad about two years ago? Clinton is almost finished, you're supposed to pick on Gore now you dimwit!

-- (go.to.bed@teeny.bopper), July 29, 2000.

I agree that few are interested anymore in discussing a lame duck. There's fresh meat out there now, meaning a new game has begun.

I also think the "swallow the leader" comment was funny.

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), July 29, 2000.

Shrubya won't need an intern like Clinton did, he's already put the Dick together with the Bush.

-- Hawk (flyin@hi.again), July 29, 2000.