Is Gore's choice for Vice President going to be a suprise?

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread

Can't help wondering if he is waiting to give us a big suprise. Could it be that he is going to pick... Hillary?

-- Hawk (flyin@hi.again), July 25, 2000

Answers

ooops! that is "surprise" (well, you get the idea :-)

-- Hawk (flyin@hi.again), July 25, 2000.

Hawk, I am so sure that Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be Albert Gore, Jr.'s Vice Presidential running mate that I am willing to paint my ass blue and run naked around my house 5 times at noon on a Sunday if it happens.

What are you willing to do, if Al doesn't pick her, or if she declines the offer?

-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), July 25, 2000.


Hawk, I am so sure that Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be Albert Gore, Jr.'s Vice Presidential running mate that I am willing to paint my ass blue and run naked around my house 5 times at noon on a Sunday if it happens.

And how would this be different than any other Sunday?

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), July 25, 2000.


ROTFL!! Good one Brian.

I'm not saying I think he will, just can't help but wonder if they might be saving this as a last minute strategy if Shrubby takes the lead. He would definitely get a lot of votes from women if she did run with him. He is being pretty secretive about who he might pick.

-- Hawk (flyin@hi.again), July 25, 2000.


Hawk you hunk, what makes you think that women would vote for that piece of work?

-- (Lorelei_Lubricious@party.hearty), July 26, 2000.


Best comment I've heard about Hillary lately was made by Craig Kilborn in his monologue last night (the 25th at 12:40 AM EDT, not tonight):

Talking about the "Hillary lesbian" rumors, Creggers looked dead in the camera, and said,

"This proves what I've said all along: Hillary actually IS a woman!"

*****

(apologies to militantdykes'r'us.gov)

-- Chicken Little (panic@isover.now), July 26, 2000.


Brian,

You better be careful, if he does, then we will be posting your words here over and over until you do as you say you will.

To others, I resent the fact that a capable, strong woman is put into such a catagory.

When I got into my carrier field back in 1972, I was told over and over that only a whore or lesbian joined the military, especially in a "man's" field. It showed resentment for the fact that I was capable of doing my job on my own merits and could still be a mentally healthy (non whore), normal hetrosexual (non lesbian) woman.

Is she a threat to so many men because she knows about her husbands "affair" and continues to live with him? Just as so many women do? Or is the resentment about the fact that she probably has him by the short hairs because of it?

-- Cherri (sams@brigadoon.com), July 26, 2000.


Truth be known, the Gore camp is having a difficult time finding someone willing to jump on a sinking ship. G.W. Bush may not be the absolute best man for the job but Al Gore and those around him dont even make the C list and the general public will soon confirm that.

-- Ra (tion@l.1), July 26, 2000.

Hint: Gore's choice will not be "Hawk". It will be one of the usual give away the store Leftists that lame brain algore has been buddies with since age 3.

-- cpr (buytexas@swbell.net), July 26, 2000.

Cherri--

Remember the 1992 campaign and the Gennifer Flowers contretemps? Bill and Hillary were obliged to do a touching interview with Dan Rather or Baba Wawa or somesuch on TV. Hillary, still in her bandanna days, smugly said she would never be a Tammy Wynette and "Stand by her Man". The implication was that she was a modern woman who would breach no such disrespect.

Yet, that is exactly what she has done. Her 50 year old husband repeatedly got BJs from a 22 year old intern in her own house with her own daughter living upstairs. Then he lied to the face of the American public about it. What a perfect opportunity to stand on her hind legs and demand respect for herself and for all women who have been so dissrespected. But what did she do? Why she stood by her man. Why? IMO, it was for no reason other than expediency. She is an ambitious woman and it served her ambitions to suck it up and stick with her husband, the President. I predict that she will divorce him as soon as he is out of office; ie, of no further value to her.

And you call this being "a capable, strong woman"? I call it being an intellectual whore.

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 26, 2000.



errata:

Not that it matters much but in my previous post I should have used the verb "brook" rather than "breach". Well, I knew it was a "br" word that I wanted. Brian would never have made such an egregious err but then Brian probably wouldn't have tried to make the same point.

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 26, 2000.


Creep,

whoever said Gore's choice would be Hawk?

You are mentally ill and chronically confused.

-- (creep.has@brain.damage), July 26, 2000.


How soon we forget. Who did the Dems nominate for Pres in 1988? Congatulations if you said Mike Dukakis (what ever happened to him anyway?). Who did the Dems nominate for VP in 1988? I dunno; Tsongas?

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 27, 2000.

So which part did we forget?

-- (what.the.hell@are.you.talking.about), July 27, 2000.

Who did the Dems nominate for VP in 1988? I dunno; Tsongas?

Lloyd "Mr. Quayle, you are no John F. Kennedy" Bentsen

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), July 27, 2000.



Moderation questions? read the FAQ