What catagory should I have used? How about one called "Sensual/ Subtle"? Note the title of the book...t

-- tom meyer (twm@mindspring.com), June 15, 2000

Answers

What, he's not dead? There I was thinking how cool that you found a dead one.

Beautiful light, nice composition. Not sure why I don't get more excited about it.

What book? Speaking of books, I've been reading "The Kindness of Women" by J.G. Ballard. Highly recommended for its evocative imagery.

-- Jeff Spirer (jeff@spirer.com), June 15, 2000.

Hum...I think he's a girl!?

I really like the way the window light frames part of the form.

How did you get over her (him) to do the photo?

If I'm not mistaken (and I know I'm not) Shawn had a similar problem many moons ago.

-- Todd Frederick (fredrick@hotcity.com), June 15, 2000.

Yep, but I think I found an answer. Suspended animation...

Great photo, Tom. It's the kind of thing I myself aspire to. shawn

-- shawn (seeinsideforever@yahoo.com), June 16, 2000.

Not dead.

In the print you can see the book on the nightstand, it's "Lolita" by Nabokov.

If you look at the bottom of the print, you can see the depressions in the bed, where I'm standing (24mm nikkor). Oh and definately a woman...can you seriously not tell?

Jeff, it's just not your kind of picture, too subtle/ romantic. You like disturbing/ romantic... I'll see if I can find one for you... t

-- tom meyer (twm@mindspring.com), June 17, 2000.

What can I say, I spend a lot of time in San Francisco. Gender is something we rarely take for granted.

-- Jeff Spirer (jeff@spirer.com), June 17, 2000.

Just tto postan image, and thoughts

Just a couple of quirky things, The shadow across the girls bck is not consistrnt with the light on the window frame, the socks... if the socks had been tight.. no problem but loose.... They seem to detract from the feel of intimacy.. and Is she playing with her hair..... an almost .. why am I doing this feeling

The book title not legible.... nice B&W, the feet are not seen clearly and do not detract from the main feel of the print.

Regards

Jack.

-- Jack McVicker (jack.m@virgin.net), June 19, 2000.

Are you suggessssting this may be a composite, you dastardly felon! I'll see you in court, my good man! Would that I had the skills to pull that (level of Photoshop)off, I'd then have the where with all to actually visit you and extract my vengance... a pound of sodium sulfite! No less! I demand satisfaction! (Hi Jack)

And as far as "loose sock"'s contribution to intimacy, I had but to lift her off the ground, and those socks fell right off... t

-- tom meyer (twm@mindspring.com), June 19, 2000.

Response to Just to post an image, no particular reason,

Sir, You have the temerity and effrontery to cast aspersion as to the validity of my considered opinion,Gad Zooks, sir, I'll have the dogs set upon you, ...but those socks........... tee hee....

regards

Jack.

-- Jack McVicker (jack.m@virgin.net), June 20, 2000.