Shrubya's Face in CNN Picture - Psychological Profile!

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread


Check out this photo from CNN. Cover one side of Bush's face and look at it and then uncover other side of his face and look at it. One side is happy, one side is sad. I think he's ambivalent to be in this!

-- Sheri (wncy2k@nccn.net), March 07, 2000

Answers

Good one Sheri, that was funny.

-- suzy (suzy@nowhere.com), March 07, 2000.

Sheri,

Try looking at Algore's face (the one in center stage that all the other candidates are looking at ;) ((thanks for the tip, media))) anyway, editorial aside, cover one half of his face, now the other.

Don't BOTH sides of his face look like he's a corpse that has been colorized by Ted Turner? I think so!

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), March 07, 2000.


Maybe he had gas

-- cin (cinlooo@aol.com), March 07, 2000.

Uncle Bob on the other forum had these insightful comments...

Don't you find it interesting that the Clinton News Network gives Gore center stage in the photo? Did you notice how healthy, friendly, and good looking the photo of Gore is? Did you notice the black man (Former Ambassador Alan Keyes)standing on the outside looking in? Did you notice Bradley and how pissed-off and left out he looks?

How about McCain and Bush...McCain looks like he always looks which is scary. Bush looks like the empty suit that he and most of them are.

No media manipulation going on at CNN, IMHO... UB

I also thought Al's face was a different color - hadn't thought of colorized by Ted Turner - funny!

-- Sheri (wncy2k@nccn.net), March 07, 2000.


Definite image manipulation.

All the cameos EXCEPT Gore have a slight green cast, and are about a stop and a half darker. The effect is Gore In The Spotlight. It's underscored by the blue of the flag that's superimposed below his chin.

But, I bet that while they were busy patting themselves on the back for highlighting Their Guy, they were oblivious to the big blue mickeymouse ears they gave him. (Which coincidentally reveal the numeric value of his candidacy.)

-- Charles Underwood Farley (chuck@u.farley), March 08, 2000.



amen, but i can't believe the media would give their media darling (mccain) such a sour look. i cannot believe the crap the manipulative media was saying last night over the loss of their boy mccain. (and i did consider him at first until he started going ballistic) guess they are losing their chance to further manipulate the republican nomination.

-- tt (cuddluppy@aol.com), March 08, 2000.

Bwaahhaahaa haaaha haaa haa!!!

Schizophrenic Shrubya!!!

Good catch Sheri.

-- Hawk (flyin@high.again), March 08, 2000.


For the lowdown on McCrank, check this out, then click on the Politics link.

-- Charles Underwood Farley (chuck@u.farley), March 08, 2000.

McCain could have won if he had joined Hair Club for Men and bought some elevator shoes.

-- (lars@indy.net), March 08, 2000.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ