Would YOU kill baby Hitler, if you had a chance?greenspun.com : LUSENET : Novenotes : One Thread
Would you kill baby Hitler, if you had a chance? Why or why not?-- Al
-- Al Schroeder (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 06, 2000
the guy above me likes to felate sheep
-- mojo (email@example.com), December 13, 2003.
Decidedly no. There is no way one can know how a child will turn out and maybe the kind of monster that Hitler was. We are hopeful that our progeny turn out well and are overjoyed when they do.....we are also hopeful for those yet to come. Many families have had to live with the knowledge that their offspring is horrible and does horrible things. Many times the siblings turned out to be the kind of people we all hope for. Just that one fluke. The double-domes can debate over this if they wish - - - I still will not and cannot see how any one can know how one baby will turn out. The thought of this causes me to draw a parallel. What if the police snatched an innocent person off the street and killed him - - - - because he might do something bad. No way, don't do babies in. According to Biblical history, Jesus just barely escaped being killed in his babyhood. I would not be willing to do anything like that.
-- doug (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 06, 2000.
If I had just two choices (let Hitler live or kill Hitler), I would have killed Hitler as a baby. However, if there were more choices like let him live, kill him, or raise him in a loving environment with a caring and respectful family who could assure me that baby Hitler would have grown up to be a respectable adult, I would have chosen to send him to that family. While killing and/or hurting another human is against both my moral and religious beliefs, if I could prevent the death of thousands of people by taking baby Hitler's life, I would have done it in a heartbeat -- even if it would have meant living with it my entire life.
-- Meg (email@example.com), March 07, 2000.
Ouch, a timeline paradox question. I am sorry to say that the killing of the baby is not foremost in my mind when you ask that question. The consequences are. If you kill Hitler, would the second world war NOT happen? Was Hitler the sole cause of the whole shabang? Maybe something else would happen that would be much worse. Like atomic bombs going off and destroying life as we know it on the planet during the cold war. Do you want to be responsible for changing history? No I don't, actually. That means I would not kill baby Hitler. Quite apart from that, the future is the history of tomorrow. That means that everything you do changes history, either in a small way or in a big way.You never know. That is why you should life by your system of values, they are the only guideline you have. Do I normally kill babies. NO. So I don't kill Hitler either. Saskia
-- Saskia (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 07, 2000.
To add to the paradox thing: My Grandfather was from Seattle and my Grandmother from the South. They met while he was stationed in the South for a short time before going oversees to fight in WWII. If not for that war, he would never have joined the army and they would never have met. Thus if I were to go back and time and kill baby Hitler I would also be commiting sucide because if my grandparents had not met then my mother would not have been born and neither would I. While my life may not compare to all the lives lost both in concentration camps and in fighting the war, it still is something to think about.
-- Lara (email@example.com), March 07, 2000.
If it wasn't for the threat of the Nazi's making a nuclear weapon (a threat of which there was none, but who knew?) there would have been no Cold War under the threat of mutually assured distruction. There also wouldn't have been a space race to spur technological advancement, so there might not have necessarily been any exploration of nuclear science. No teflon frying pans. No internet. No Tang. Would Japan be the economic superpower today that provides us with those cute little Pokémon? I shudder to consider the alternative.
And wasn't it the Cold War that accelerrated the demise of Soviet Communism? Would the United States be a more socialist government? Or would the US government become more reactionary, putting civil liberties at a lower priority, outweighed by the threat of Communist expansion. Maybe Orwells version of the future was prevented by the Cold War. Instead of the planned obsolescence we live with today, imagine the lifestyle options 60's and 70's extending into the 21st century. Imagine if Communist witchhunts and US military containment and, God forbid, hippies were things that never went away, these last 30 years. I'm more inclined to wonder what's going to happen next, rather than wonder what could have been. Unless you have some kind of perverse urge to change your personal history to include a Mike Brady perm for every male Baby Boomers you've known for the last 30 years, I would recommend putting that Hitler baby down, before you doom us all.
-- Mike (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 08, 2000.
-- qwwer yui (email@example.com), November 06, 2000.
i'd kill him.he killed 6 million of my race.If i was his dad i d kill myself and him .I am listening a song of a jewish guy and speaking how the jews were killed.You people ....80 % percent wanted to kill him.the other 20 percent.neo naziz.the biggest thing you shouldn't do in the jewish law is kill.But i would kill anyone who was with hitler i'd kill all the neo naziz even if i had to go to hell for all my life .
-- dont ask (VECA3000@hotmail.com), November 18, 2000.
no i would not kill hitler if he was a baby child becuz ther is no reason to take one's life for believing in what they do. everbody believes in what they do and in hitler's case it was to get rid of the jews in germany and thats what he did. everybody thinks hitler was so bad when he wasn't even as close to bein as bad as stalin was (the russian dictator in ww2) stalin killed over 35 million ppl while hitler killed 12 million and i belive that makes hitler a less of a monster than stalin..... that is y i don't understand y the united states joined in with russia in ww2 instead of germany .stalin was way worse than hitler and the u.s. was for democracy (basically what germany was when russia was communist. y would a democracy country join a communist? i belive the u.s. did that becuz they didn't want the pussies from great britain to get mad ...all hitler wanted was russia and the land of germany back...but whoever is readin this is prolly thinkin im a nazi but im not i just believe that there was an even bigger monster than hitler in this world and there are many more but all im sayin is that nobody should take one's life for believing in what they do and it was the jews fault that they died becuz hitler warned the jews to get out of germany but they didn't listen and that is they were killed ......i just believe that GOD has a reason to make a women give birth to a son or daughter and nobody should take that away.
-- SEAN C. LAIRD (Livearm@hotmail.com), December 22, 2000.
-- chandra s. (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 08, 2001.
Yes, because he killed MILLIONS of innocent people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hitler's own grandfather may have been a jew aswell!!!!!
I can't believe that man!!!!!!!!
-- chandra s. (email@example.com), February 08, 2001.
Kill him because he was a bad guy
-- Brittany Mcgrew (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 23, 2001.
Well.... Hitler had great sex appeal... Personally I would fuck him day and night 24/7...
He had a great colon, with lots of room for manouvers in sticky situations....
Yes I fucked Hitler!
-- Gary Glitter (D_RIPPER100@HOTMAIL.COM), March 23, 2001.
No, he made great things with the JUDIOS!!! Jeweshes, The judíos are Sheet man!!! Fuck Them!!!
-- Mariana Stefanolo (email@example.com), March 28, 2001.
I think the Churches said it best when they refered to Hitler as being possessed. The "demon" would have just entered someone else.
-- Rob (firstname.lastname@example.org), April 10, 2001.
hey go to my wesite at www.goatse.cx
-- Gary Dick Giver (Michilin_MaHNNN@hotmial.com), April 19, 2001.
i would kill that fucker i think he was a piece of shit fattass mutherfucker and i would torture his baby ass ifd could that sonof a monkeys ass fucker i woyuld spiit on him and the burn his testaclesd that fuck /
-- weimer chink (email@example.com), May 30, 2001.
I dont agree with any of u people that say u would kill Baby Hitler. Your all blow ass swine that couldn't do shit and act hard behind a keybaord. Adolf Hitler was at one stage the most powerful man in the world.He could captivate an entire nation with few words.Adolf Hitler isn't "pure evil" and "satan in human form" like everybody says. America and england used him for a scape goat for their own crimes and refusal for non aggression. I dont know if all that bullshit about killng jews is entirely true either. I know that he hated them but if u are christian then u should remember who turned on Jesus christ 2000 years ago. I know its no excuse for torturing them like that but what country is killing everybody know...Israel! Im not a racist man, i have a jewish friend, but this is just my opinion. like him or hate him, Adolf Hitler left a mark in history. And there is no way he died in his berlin bunker in 1945. He was too smart for that, he escaped like some of his generals did, the man probably has siblings in argentina.
-- Nick (Nickh@optushome.com.au), June 13, 2001.
No, because is impredicytable to know If he is good of bad when is a baby, and I admire Hitler !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-- Claudia Von Hagenbach (firstname.lastname@example.org), October 10, 2001.
I would kill that mother fucker ass licker. he was such pussy
-- benjamin (email@example.com), November 13, 2001.
i would kill the dumb ass mother fucker pienes wrinkle i burn his testicals and cut his dick off and burn it like a shishkabob!!!
-- mike boob (mikekbAE@aol.com), November 13, 2001.
I would kill that mother fucker ass licker. he was such pussy bitch
-- benjamin (firstname.lastname@example.org), November 13, 2001.
i would kill that cock ass! he is so stupid with his gay beard and i would cut off his tsticals and feed them to fich and stick a pencil in his pehole
-- mike boob (mikekbAE@yahoo.com), November 13, 2001.
yes kill him
-- moises de la torre (JACKASSculo@yahoo.com), January 28, 2002.
fuck yeah of corse id kill that bastard
-- smithy (email@example.com), February 17, 2002.
I love hitler and what he has contributed to. I believe that what he did was for the better and if I was him I would be proud of the accomplishments made. I wish he was still alive so I could ask him for guidance to rule the world. Everyone beware!! I speak to him at night. He has given me much insight on how to start world war 3. It will begin soon! I love your great-grandfather!!!
-- Adolf Hitler Jr Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 19, 2002.
No, all you idiots out there who would.........die. You stupid fuckers. German Nazis invented the NASA Project......you morons. Einstien was a german and invented the E=MC2. If it wasn't for the Nazis there wouldn't be fore man on the moon. All you people who dis him and say hes a fucker and a pussy. You are just ignorant. you have no proof. He did do something bad obviously, but his thinking was good. -your mom-
-- Eric Winter (email@example.com), March 06, 2002.
no i wouldn't kill baby hitler because then we wouldn't have had the holocaust and we wouldn't have anything interesting to learn about in world civ...plus he was such an adorable baby! i'm not saying i like or hate hitler because i'm unsure. i hate the fact that he killed millions of people but you would be erasing history...ya know?
-- Ashley (Ashbo008@yahoo.com), April 14, 2002.
-- ... (firstname.lastname@example.org), May 10, 2002.
i'd like to ask everyone whos posted a question would you go back and kill baby george washington and the other guys who created the country of america or baby jesus, mohammad or other religious peoples beacuse think about it the country of amaetrica went on to virtually wipe out the native people of america hunting them down and massacering them ,jesus and other religious people brought about the creation of religions which look at the problems theyve caused throughout history how many millions of ppl have been killed raped murdered discriminated against in the name of god because that person has different belifs than them , so my answer to the question is no i woiuldnt kill baby hitler , yes the events in world war 2 where wrong and shouldnt of happened and i despise and hate hitler for that but i also respect him for what he did before the war for germany taking a nation destroyed by the depression turned it around giving millions of unemployed homeless starving women and children jobs homes security. you cant forget those points, and yes hitler is to blame for the events of ww2 he caused them but remember who didnt stop him till it was to late who joined on hitlers side, if more countries had stood upto him at the start the war would never have lasted till 1945 and the final solution wasnt proposed and carried out untill 1942- 43,in my opinion if america had joined the war at the start and if not then but soon after then hitler could have been stopped the death of 50 million people could have been prevented but they were too happy making money from selling arms to the allies so everyone please remember think about the whole picture and not jus the holocaust, nazi, hitler evil, rant told to you by society, one last thing i'd like to say before i go britain was the first country to use concentration camps in the boar war.
-- (email@example.com), May 14, 2002.
I would a took a shiney new cheese grater and srape his skin till it's like an aligator,then I would slice of his leggs and sell em on ebay and thats my kind and loving way of saying happy birthday-HITLER! Dude,mayby some of you didn't realize that the whacko Bas##rd killed 6 million jews just because he couldn't get into art school!
-- F##K you (no!I deleted 5 ACCOUNTS,becausew of spamers@fF##kyou.com), May 24, 2002.
Hitler was the first expierment in a German plot the clone a leader who could be placed in every continent on the planet. The first six Hitler clones did not survive the incubation stage. The last three did. German, 1956 the first Hitler was reanimated. His named was changed to Edwin Hellsinger. He currently lives in Shaboygin, Ill. He will rise. He will take over the world again. Beware.
-- Bill Hinkley (BillHinkley@hinkleyuniv.edu), July 31, 2002.
Baby Hitler was just so cute. With those fat little cheeks, and that drooling little mouth, Boo, Boo Boo. Baby Hitler's favorite toy was his little GAS STATION. He would steel his sisters little dollys and gas them all up. Baby Hitler was a total darling. It's all society's fault that he had any problems. He was the most perfect and innocent little child with great parents. Baby Hitler was the cutest little baby with perfect parents and community. Today we are so lucky to have so many babies like Baby Hitler around. Just check any daycare centre.
-- Ernest Jackson (Ernie_L_Jackson@yahoo.com), September 03, 2002.
This is essentially an idiotic question because it can't be done. Pure intellectual masturbation. But since we're on the topic, you yourself may wind up committing heinous crimes one day. Should you have been killed in your crib?
-- Brian Johnson (firstname.lastname@example.org), September 09, 2002.
Ok lets see would I have killed baby Hitler no. Now before everybody reading this calls me an idoit let me explian way. It's like this hitler was a major factor in starting ww2 wich was a catalyst of technological advancement. One of the scientist that left his homeland was responsible for making the us aware of the potinal devolpment of the nuclear bomb by germany. if hitler was not born then no war no great technological achievements of that era also anthore country my have devolped the bomb and used it for the same pourpose hitler would have. also it's wrong to kill an innocent no matter what kind of evil man they will grow up to be. At that point he was as innocent as the ppl he killed. and last but not least if hitler was never born than the world would not have a modle of that type of evil. To show the dangers of intolerence,hate and fear. and to see what can result from an idealogy of what the perfect human bean is. We may hate hitler for what he did but it is important for us to rember what he taught us.
-- Davey Jones (email@example.com), September 14, 2002.
I would not kill baby Hitler because he and the Nazis are an important part of history. Imagine if the Japs had taken over the world or something else equally horrific. Also, Hitler created Volkswagen, brought prosperity and self respect to germans, was Time Year Magazine Man of the Year, etc. Also, killing babies is sick and wrong.
-- Hans (firstname.lastname@example.org), December 02, 2002.
I would not kill baby Hitler because killing a baby is just plain wrong, but I would probably kidnap him and raise him differently. Yeah, like to see that happen.
-- Silla Song (AgentBach@yahoo.com), December 06, 2002.
Straight forword, I would kill baby hitler in a heart beat if i knew that he would grow up to kill as many innocent people as he did. I would tell his parents and i would appolagize for what i had to do. I am Canadian and many of my reletives fought and died trying to kill hitler.so thats my answer and i hope people do create a time machine, so i can go back in time and kill baby hitler
-- Drew the hitler killer (DamnThatguy@hotmail.com), December 12, 2002.
The answer to this is most definately no. I would of course use my time traveling powers to go back and give the Germany military the advance strategic plans so they won the war. The worlds fucked up today for one reason.. the purge wasnt successful.
-- hans eichman (email@example.com), December 19, 2002.
Drew the hitler killer - INNOCENT? Jews were not innocent. they were trying to establish a power base in germany before taking over the world. we should be praising the nasdaps efforts to remove them from the face of the earth
-- prof mengele (firstname.lastname@example.org), December 19, 2002.
no becaues he turned evil later in life by chance. http://www.babykiller.com
-- deb (email@example.com), January 03, 2003.
Sigh some of you fuckers are really stupid and obviously have no clue of anything about Hitler. And to all you people that say "no i'd never kill a baby", you are also stupid. The question isn't what it is literally typed out to be. Just read the question as, Do you believe in hitler's beliefs, yes or no.
As for me, it doesnt even really metter what I think. Hitler did go a little overboard but it was all out of rage and revenge. After the first World War, the way the Allied powers treated Germany was very very unfair. They stripped Germany of land and sent them into a spirling depression. And when Hitler seen his people with no sensible leader and the German people suffering he wanted revenge. The first people he noticed that weren't affected by the depression were the Jews. So out of spite of the Allied powers and jealousy of the jews, he gave the German people a reason to rise back up and fight. Anyone who can get an entire country out of a depression like that is not only a great leader but genious. Think about it. Imagine if you were so poor you ate rats off of the streets. You literally killed for food, had to wear the same clothes daily and lived with 12-15 other people in a 1 room apartment. If someone gave you an out to that I think, believe it or not, you would be finding yourself hating Jews too. Asking yourself "why is it that im poor and the jew next store eats 3 meals a day?" Anyone who offered an out to that would definitly get my vote. So Hitler comes to power. (will be continued)
-- Alexander (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 13, 2003.
Now as for the halocaust. Yes it was a LITTLE overboard. I think taking the businesses of the Jews was enough, but who would want a bunch of starving jews running around? So I guess it was better off he might as well kill them and put them out of their certain misery. Oh, and about the handicapped and mental.... do we really need them?? I'm glad he off'd with them too. We cannot blame Hitler for killing 12 million people. All i can say is at least he had a good reason. Take a look at people like Stalin, Japan (Rape of Nanking), and even us, the USA, for chirstsake. Stalin killed over 35 million people, Japan raped and murdered 100s of thousands of Chinese people out of simple racism, and even the US. We dropped the atomic bomb ONLY ONLY ONLY because we wanted to see what it would do. After the Yalta Conference Japan was already about to surrender. And to think we dropped a second one after we saw the desrtuction of the first is just plain ludacris. So please spread your anger throughout all these people and not just Adolf. Hitler changed Germany for the better. Through the Halocaust major medical breakthroughs were discovered and the people of Germany were united as one. He made them a world power. The only stupid thing i think Hitler did was try to take over the world. When Americans die because Hitler wanted to be greedy thats where it pisses me off. But hey, that's war for ya.
-- Alexander (email@example.com), January 13, 2003.
Hey it's me again. And this one goes out to all you stupid fucks thats think technology would have suddenly stopped if Hitler or WW2 didn't happen. For instance "There would have been no atomic bomb" "if i twasnt for hitler there would have been no cold war" "if it wasnt for hitler we wouldn't have landed on the moon" People please. Don't be fucking retarded. WW2 merely just sped up the production of the atomic bomb. Believe it or not Einstein and all those other scientist were conducting theorys and expiriments involving nuclear science before WW2. And thats about the only thing. You asses that say we wouldn't have landed on the moon are like.... derrrr. Take your head out of your ass. The only thing that we prolly wouldnt have if it weren't for WW2/Hitler would be those fine automobile companies like volksvagon (lol)
-- Alexander (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 13, 2003.
HEY FAGS! :D
-- Fuckhead (email@example.com), January 13, 2003.
look.. i think this cowkilla kid is a dickhead.. all i want to say is HAIL HITLER... would i kill him? hell no.. the advancement of science alone is worth 40 million people who we can now clone due to 1 joseph mengela... thats right the nazi's relaly advanced cloning and many other things. sure some of it might of seemed sick but if u think giving a monkey cancer isnt then your the bitch who should have been killed. and the most ironic thing is.. we let hitler go for about 3 years,taking and controlling countries as he pleased. then WW2 started because of that, he even said if the french would of even resisted by firing 1 shot at the Rhineland (which would be his first take over) he would have marched right back to germany. But they ran away, no other country even attempted to stop him throughout the start of his campaign.
PART 2 IS UNDERNEATH
-- Josh (JDougy@hotmail.com), January 13, 2003.
And now a'days people bitch because we try and hep other countries and get involved. Sure we do alot for oil but really we are also preventing another WW2. And i would of defiently not killed hitler, he is a role model to me. If i myself was able to manipulate a whole country,leading to a mass of countries,i think id do it. id take out the mexicans tho. oh and by the way for all you women. if it wasnt for hitler,all the men would of still had there jobs and you wouldnt of taken over most of the american job force. after ww2 many of the ladies stayed in those jobs basically making it the time in which women not ONLY men could hold a job. and there are millions of other things he has done which i will periodically post. but by just a few reasons alone make me believe hitler was,and always will be the smartest, powerfullest, most godlike leader of all times. everyway he set up his war was near genius. he come sout of jail for trying to over throw a government and GIVES away his book he had wrote Mein Kampf. Now think about this. a whole poor country who has nothing to live for except maybe a quick death. And u see someone giving awya a feee book, you take this book. even if u dont read it u can burn it or soemthing,which im sure alot of people did seeing that ww1 offset the german money so much that if u had the same weight of money and wood. it would be more expensive to buy and burn the wood. hey but whatever ill add more later. peace my brothers and fellow followers.
signed, U.S.Marshal Josh Douglas
-- Josh (JDougy@hotmail.com), January 13, 2003.
HEY FUCK YOU ALL BITCHES!HAHAHHA I SUCKED UR MOMS DICK
-- joe (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 13, 2003.
There should be no admiration for hitler unless you are a NAZI! Hitler was a class warrior he drove down living wages by 30% and then went to war and then killed not just jews but gays, communists and trade unionists.
The idea of going back in time is crap, and Hitler was a product of his times the jingoism of extreme nationalism. That is why nationalism is dangerous.
Hitler could have been stopped by a revolt but the signal to go into revolt never happened thanks to Stalin. If the SPD had not murdered the KPD's leaders in 1919 then they may have taken the initiative. If the russian revolution spread to Germany and the revolution was won and not lost would also have stopped hitler.
remember it was hindenburg that signed a faustian pact with hitler because he feared the nazis less than he feared the 'reds'.
-- Richard Stephens (email@example.com), January 14, 2003.
Fuck killing hitler, he's my nigga if i had the chance id go kill some jews with him! U cant take down hitler cuz hes just too damn cool man. oh and the KKK roxor too.
-- T-Bag (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 15, 2003.
you know i don't understand why all of you are so filled with hate
aside from the final solution, hitler was a model human being
in fact, he helped lead the charge against animal testing. you're all buying into the lies about him spread by the liberal media who just can't comprehend the hypothesis of a "compassionate hitler"
-- dr. emmanuel cocktor (email@example.com), January 19, 2003.
most definitely not! in fact i would devote my whole life to protecting our young hitler until he was old enough to claim his rightful place as ruler of the great Aryan race. please check out my old band's website for more info on our ideas: www.angelfire.com/pa/ktmwq thank you, Mike McKee, ex-kill the man who questions
-- Mike McKee (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 19, 2003.
Id Fucking Sufficate that baby in a pot of my own shit and piss! or id tell all the jews wat he was gunna do in the future and throw him into a crowd of jews and watch his ass die!!!!!FUCK BABY HITLER
-- Hitler (HitlerRuls@aol.com), January 31, 2003.
I WOULD NOT KILL HITLER. HE ACTUALLY DID THE WORLD SOME GOOD. FOT THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE READ MEIN KAMPF, YOU WILL KNOW WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT. THE JEWS WERE TAKING OVER THE WORLD UNDETECTED. THEY WERE/ARE CLING ONS. THEY FIND A RACE THEY WANT TO BELONGTO BECAUSE THEIRS IS SHIT ALREADY, THEN THEY LEARN THE LANGUAGE AND SAY THEY ARE THAT RACE, BUT THEN THEY KEEP THE TRADITIONS OF THE JEW. THEY DO THIS, THEY DO THAT. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT THE CHRISTIANS HATE THE JEWS - THAT'S WHY THE CHURCHES DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST. THE HOLOCAUST, IN FACT, DID NOT EVEN HAPPEN AS THE JEWS SAY IT DID. SCIENTISTS ARE EXAMINING THE EVIDENCE. JEWS CLAIM THAT WE KILLED 5 MILLION + JEWS. SCIENTISTS SAY THAT IF WE KILLED THIS MANY, THERE WOULDN'T BE A FUCKING JEW LEFT ON THIS EARTH (OH, I WISH!). THAT'S WHY HITLER SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN KILLED, THEN I WOULDN'T HAVE HAD AN UNCLE.
-- Heidi (email@example.com), February 01, 2003.
Yes, I would kill him. It was because of him that 6 millions jews died. He's evil. Killing him would mean one death, but if you killed him before he killed all those jews thenevery thing would be OK.
-- alison (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 25, 2003.
schwachsinnige diskussion. lächerlich. ich glaube man sagt "bullshit" bei euch.
-- My Full Name (MyEmail@Adress.de), February 26, 2003.
Kill the son of bitch! he killed lika about 6 million jews!!!
-- Meee (Ja@du.com), March 07, 2003.
Hello my name is Jim. Do you want to buy some yellow snow? Hamish Bones is a cockmaster who copies everything funny I say, but does it badly so its FUCKING ANNOYING. He should be locked in a room with baby Hitler, and they should be flamed to death with a big slow flame. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. Hello Jim
-- Jim Jim Jim (Jim@hotmail.com), March 11, 2003.
Hello I'm a gay fuck who like to eat shit and I like to lick dogs cocks till they cum on my face and my mouth is locked shut from white sticky. I am a stupid shit and I want to be like hitler when I grow up. Please, someone, kill me now. Or take the piss from me on my hotmail address. Please. I want to bum rape you and everyone you care about!!!
-- Hamish Bones (email@example.com), March 11, 2003.
i would just seriously injure him, just to teach him what he was going to do was wrong, hello!!!!
-- Luke (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 11, 2003.
In theory I would. Personally as my friends would tell you I come off as a hard headed somewhat violent person, but I'm not too certian I would be able to murder a baby. Given the chance ( and failing) I would probably help him become an artist. Links to his paintings can be found,he could paint very well. Given the chance to become a decent human being who knows what would've happened.
-- Thoughts. (email@example.com), March 12, 2003.
I would take a baseball bat and slam it into baby hitler's face. Then I'd feed it to my snake. Then I'd rip baby hitler out of my snake and repeat the process over and over again until I myself wither away.
-- Ben (JTMONEY10001@AOL.COM), April 04, 2003.
Who really cares? The mans been gone now for over 50 years, why should anyone be bothered.
-- Mini Me (firstname.lastname@example.org), April 24, 2003.
Look................................................................. ............................... If I knew then (way befor I was born) what I know now.................................................................. YES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
-- Danny Shrewsbury (email@example.com), April 25, 2003.
I would stick my foot long down his throat and pull it out his ass and bust a nut in his mom's clit and throw my hundred pound balls down his mom's throat and make her suffer and did and then i'd go and get hella pussy and bust fat nuts in thier but.
-- Kill Hitler Chico cali (firstname.lastname@example.org), April 30, 2003.
Yes I would end his life as soon as his insane little head popped out. The man was insane. Anyone who wouldn't is insane also.
-- Jay Saka (email@example.com), May 01, 2003.
I would put baby Hitler to suck my cock very hardly. Then I would shoot my beans inside his throat and kill him sufocated. Yeah, I would do that to baby Hitler, while a friend of mine would be violating his baby anus.
-- Cock Sucker Mother Fucker (firstname.lastname@example.org), May 06, 2003.
YES, I DO NOT WANT A BABY CHILD FULL OF DESTRUCTION TO RULE MY PLANET! AHAHAHAHAHAHA ugly im done now
-- Ryan Something (CBrower823@aol.com), May 15, 2003.
TAKE MY COCK INTO YOUR MOUTH
-- Val Venis (email@example.com), July 31, 2003.
I'd kill baby Hitler just cause I'd get to kill sombody. I love killing people although I've only done it twice. I wish I worked at one of them concentration camps though. It makes me cum in my sweatpants to think about murdering all those people. I'm not racist like Hitler though. I'll kill anything I can get my hands on.
-- X (firstname.lastname@example.org), August 20, 2003.
I would not kill baby Hitler, just because it would be simple to change his outcome. If the man would have had a better home enviroment when he was a child, he probably would have turned out just like any other Austrian. And yes he was Austrian until World war one broke out. And during the war is when Hitler became a Jew hater. But after the war is where his amazing speaking ability is the only reason he got recognized.
-- ADAM JOHN (email@example.com), September 19, 2003.
-- jack black (firstname.lastname@example.org), September 19, 2003.
YOU PEOPLE THAT ADMIRE HITLER OR LIKE HIM YOU ARE SO FREAKIN CRAZY...GO TO HELL YOU BASTARDS!!!YOU ARE SUCH IDIOTS!!! how CAN YOU LIKE SOMEONE THAT KILLED SO MUCH PEOPLE!!!
-- missy (email@example.com), November 20, 2003.
Well now I believe that ....I would have not killed him at all....I believe that in a way it was a good thing because the world would have been way too populated if this never occured....
-- Nate Faas (Iznatester@aol.com), December 03, 2003.
big up torontojungle.com.
bunch of baby fuckers, all of you
-- nonsense (nonsense@toronto_jungle.com), December 13, 2003.
Hitler wasn't the problem!
Lets take a step back in time to Europe during the 20's when inflation was so high, people were dying of starvation in the middle of the street. As one German Woman said "I left a basket filled with deutsche marks outside for a moment and when i returned, someone made off with the basket but left the money" Money had no value but we all know who had ran Germany into the ground don't we? They are the same people who bought the Trade Buildings just before they were thrown to the ground. They're the same people who've bankrolled numerous attacks on peasants throughout central america.
A Quote from the Editor of the NYTimes March 1943: "I'm sick and tired of hearing about what's going on to the Jews in Europe! We Jews here in America have our own problems" end of Quote. the editor of the times was a Jew..... Remember the tower of babel, as one stone fell they'd stop work to mourn but if 100 men fell to there deaths, work continued.
All those people are the Jews and money is there only goal, they are neither humanitarians nor criminals, they just don't care about anything other than money.
It is for that reason we had a holocaust, Iraqi war, Osama bin laden, etc ete etc..
I would not kill Adolf Hitler as an infant rather, I would have permitted him entry into the Vienna Art school. I'm sure he'd turn out a whole lot different.
-- no name (JPPGOV4@aol.com), December 23, 2003.
It really is the most ignorant discusion i have ever read, half of the people who would just kill him dont seem to realise what would have happened with out him. Germany had a ridiculous hisotry of nationalism, almost undoubtedly someone worse or as bad would have damnaged the world. You also look past the fact that Stalin would have been the person to occupy the political vacuum, at least for a time, he killed over 10 million peasants, for no other reason than dislike. could o on forever, just ask your self weather it would be worth risking life as we know it...
-- Darren John (firstname.lastname@example.org), January 14, 2004.
I thik that killing hitler won't be enoght satispaction for all the people in the world. As a baby no one knew his plane and you can't judje him at that time. I personaly hate him and wished that he would't kill himself and go throw sufferment like the 11 million people he killed until his last day to live, but he go out of it easy by killing himself. but my response to this question would be no, cause no one knew any thing about him and every new born should have the chance to k=live no matter what!!!! (in his case i wish he would never born)
-- personal (email@example.com), February 19, 2004.
First, I would like to point out the fact that everybody who said they wouldn't kill baby Hitler because he did such wonderful things and the Holocaust never happened, are the most god awful writers i have ever seen. If you would have spent anytime studying, which you obviously didn't , not only would your writing style resemble that of at least a ten year old , but you would also understand how big of a prick Hitler was and the countless amount of evidence that exist proving all of the details about the Holocasut to be true. As far as killing Hittler as a baby, that is ridiculous. The whole point of me writting this is just to point out how stupid the haters on this site are.
-- Charles (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 24, 2004.
first of all hell yes i would he killed TWELVE MILLION PPL including 6 million jews. Secondly, all you fucking neo nazis can go to hell!!!!!!!! third, ditto 4th, he had a fuckin stupid moustach which alone should be puishable by death. so, lastly, FUCK YOU NAZI SHITHEADS WHO THINK THEY ARE SUPERIOR EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO PHYSICAL DIFFERENCE I BET YOURE ALL BIGATTED RACSIST SEXIST PIECES OF SHIT WHO DRESS UP IN SHEETS EVERY SATUDAY NIGHT!!! IM A JEW BITCH!!! WHATCHA GONNA DO?
-- fuck you neo nazis (email@example.com), February 24, 2004.
srry that was a spelling error it should be biggoted you nazi fucks
-- (firstname.lastname@example.org), February 24, 2004.
Hitler killed 12 million? Sorry, but no matter how efficient you are, that's just not feasable.
Jews claimed that groups were led into showers, the doors were shut for 10 to 15 minutes, and they were gassed.
Let's look at the facts: Zyklon B was allegedly used to "kill" the Jews. Not a good claim because this particular chemical is insufficient as a means for mass-murdering. Not only is it an insecticide, but the gassing process takes between 2 and 72 hours. On top of that, complete ventilation takes 10 hours. For a crowd of 100+ Jews, it would take between 12 and 82 hours to completely exterminate the whole room.
Again, look at the historical facts. Between WWI and WWII, Typhus was rampant throughout Germany. Yes, Jews were rounded into concentration camps, however Hitler's plans were for deportation rather than extermination. Not only was Typhus killing people on the streets, but it was most prevalent in concentration camps due to the working conditions. Typhus was carried by lice which is why the Jews and homosexuals were showered and shaved before they were admitted into the camps.
But what about the furnaces? How else do you kill a disease other than burning the source? Once someone was killed by Typhus, they would be burned in order to prevent the spread of the disease. It takes 20 minutes to completely cremate a body. To burn 12 million bodies could be done in no less than 7-10 years assuming the furnaces are CONSTANTLY running.
Germany simply did not have the means for genocide and such extermination on a wide scale. Germany was too busy fighting a two front war, and did not have resources to continentally run trains constantly in order to bring Jews to camps. Yes, several local Jews were brought for deportation, but in the end Typhus was the killer.
-- Tim (email@example.com), March 04, 2004.
Tim is either a fucking fool or a closet Nazi either way he has shown a complete lack of compassion and rabid anti semitism. And I'm not jewish I do not care for the Israeli regime but I will defend the holocaust.
Someone should read the Lipstadt vs Irving debate. Irving is also a holocaust denier and got whipped in the courts by Lipstadt.
Usually the figure is quoted to be 6 million jews and the were gassed or shot. Shooting being ineffecient due to soldiers not wanting to kill the elderly, women and children. The Zyklon B was used (imported from Sweden too). The ovens to dispose of the bodies were designed to burn on human body fat and once they were coked up they could burn by throwing bodies into the oven, more importantly this design was patented! A lot of jews died of desease or hunger, etc but you cannot deny the assembly line of destruction of life at camps like Auschwitz, the factory production of death is what made it gruesome and that figure stands at 6 million.
Moreover, on the hitler debate if the German workers had won during 1918-23 there may have been no Adolf hitler nor Joseph Stalin.
Germany was fighting on one front most of the time 1939-40 the western front and 1941-43 the eastern front and it was the last two years of the war that Germany was fighting on two fronts.
The figures for gassing were designed on epic proportions in 5-10 minutes 2000 could be gassed in big chambers and 1000 in small ones. A lot quicker than the gas vans at Chelmno.
This is one of the most disturbing pieces of human history and it should be treated with respect or some nutter will do it again. This time they will use Nukes.
-- Rich Stephens (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 04, 2004.
Israel has benefitted so much from the holocaust. A total of 90 billion dollars in reparations has been given to Israel. The Jews have benefitted so much, and they will continue to. They have the copyright and trademark on the word "Holocaust" which is why it's always capitalized when you see it.
Not only that, but the holocaust is talked about more often today than it was in the 40's and 50's. Just look through newspaper records, in recent decades there are nearly ten times as many holocaust articles than there actually were in the 40's. Any event, no matter how tragic, is usually talked about less and less as time goes on.
Closet Nazi? Yes, I'm an American National Socialist. I respect your views and reasoning, can't you at least pretend to respect mine?
-- Tim (email@example.com), March 05, 2004.
Well I won't respect your views on racism coz its a scum Nazi view.
The USA has benefitted the most out of Israel as the watch dog on the middle east from funding arms to Iraq and Iran during the 1980s. The 2 nations capitulated in supplying weapons to both sides so that the US would not lose face for defying its own trade embargo.
Furthermore I won't tolerate homophobic, racist views of Nazism because I am an Interntional Socialist of the Trotskyist kind which has suffered enough at the hands of your Nazi ideas, Zionists and Stalinists/Maoists. Where there is injustice I will be there and at present its kicking your nazi views off this site.
Nazism has one place and thats the dustbin of history. The only other 2 nations that have done systematic killings was the USA towards Native Americans and the British in wiping out the entire populace of Tasmania. So don't give me the crap about trade marking the Holocaust. The difference was the Nazi's industrial methods of killing rather than the hunting and shooting of the British and US, which is genocide and none the less barbaric. To the point of fact most of the civilised world has engaged in some form of butchery far greater than any 'savage' could dream of.
I come from the Uk and we hate nazis and we don't allow them to speak because we understand that freedom of speech means nothing compared to the freedom to live in peace. Jews in deathcamps had freedom of speech, they could say what they want they were going to die, likewise to white supremecists that hide behind freedom of speech you can go on about it and they will be killing some poor non white guy. Nazi ideology's freedom of speech ticket goes hand in hand with their violence against minorities and at the end of it Nazis want to spread fear into the working community so they stay at home whilst racist thugs terrorise anyone who opposes them. Yeah great ideas for the 21st century. Leave them as a piece of terrible history of the past of which we can learn by. Lets get on with building a better future
-- Richard Stephens (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 05, 2004.
I simply believe every nationality has it's own place to live, I would never wish death upon anyone.
Acts 17:26 - [He] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.
I believe Hitler was right in the idea of "living space" and I don't believe (obviously) in the extremities of the Holocaust. Again, I don't wish for people to die. I wish for Africa to be all black and Mexico to be all brown just as much as I wish for the United States to be all white. I believe every nationality should stay in their own "living space." I believe it is wrong for Mexicans to intrude on the U.S., and in the same manner I believe it is wrong for Americans to move to Mexico since it is not our home.
-- Tim (email@example.com), March 15, 2004.
-- Anon (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 16, 2004.
Well I will expand on the 'Nope' statement.
I mean everyone stays where they are etc. You live in the USA and you say that about it being white. What about the Native American, they could say oi whitey piss off back to europe. And the last thing Europe wants is a bunch of Americans coming over, we thought we got rid of you. Your far too religious for any european. enough about that.
Then you have the whole history of colonialism and slavery and its great for a white guy to say each to their own when the world is in the mess the colonialists and the imperialists that have created. What about the blacks, who have the right to say 'we built your nation'.
Everything is not about skin colour, my girlfriend is french and apart from the European community's trade agreement the EU (european union) she is allowed work in the UK, which makes her an economic migrant, but those insults are usually levelled at the non white people in the UK and not all the Americans/Canadians/Austrialians/New Zealanders and (white) South Africans that over stay their work permits anyway. They are never hunted down by immigration controls.
Its about class, you have realivitly have squat or slightly more than the guy that really has squat because the ruling class nicks your wealth through your wages and your rent/mortgage etc. Look how wealthy the US is and then look at the mass of poverty in the US too, something does not add up. Someone is getting rich off of you and it aint not black conspiracy or hispanic subversion or what ever ethnic group is hated at present etc. Its usually white guys in nice suits screwing you and asking you to blame others for being screwed.
This is why nazi ideology sucks it asks the workers to put the noose round their necks and jump in the name of the nation jump for the national interest you must die but not before you worked your butts off for a really shit wage. Its about time the bosses gave back what they stole from us in the first place.
-- richard stephens (email@example.com), March 16, 2004.
I really dont know, i mean i think the question has a lot of possibilities. I think Hitler did have many phycological problems that he should have worked out. But i dont think i'd accually be able to kill him, one because i didnt know him, he was a child, an innocent person at that time, and if i would have said yes, id be just like he was. I wouldnt be able to kill someone that was innocent of something. There will ALWAYS be another hitler, human beings are capable of all evil, ther are things we can never determine. I mean, people are able to go crazy, murder and so many other things its unthinkable. I think if we killed hitler there would be things missing, but also, there woudl be things that made life better. But there could always be another hitler, or another Dr. Mengele, or another man/woman that tries to take over the world. We will never know until it happens. I do not think that people should have turned their heads and just kept out of what was happening as long as they did. And i dont agree with what hitler did, I think it was wrong, but, in some ways, hitler was a very smart man. Who could persuade millions of people to think exactly like him? Who could subject the crimes he commited without being punished for years? Who could gain so much power, that he was partly the reason of taking millions upon millions of lives? Yes he was evil, but in some ways he was very smart. Its only a matter of time until another Hitler comes along. Man is capable of so much, that, its just unethical to think you could go back and kill someone because of what they did, so no, i dont think i would, yet, i would try and make as many changes in the world NOW as i could, because 1939-1945 isnt what we have to worry about is it? we only have HERE AND NOW, whats around us? The world is a fucked up place, shit happens, you cant explain it and cant change it, all you can change is yourself, and maybe theway you see the world. Unless of course your a reborn hitler, you can change the minds of millions.... P.S. All of you idiots who just type up stupid stuff about your nuts or dix or w/e are just stupid we dont really care about ur nuts or dix because...your gay..so thanks in advance..
-- Alyssa (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 16, 2004.
I WOULD LOVE TO KILL HITLER IF I HAD THE CHANCE. I WORLD SHASH HIS RISTS WITH A RUSTY KNIFE. THEN I WOULD MAKE HIM DRINK HIS OWN BLOOD AND PISS. THEN I WOULD KICK A FIELD GOLE WITH HIM
-- jay z (email@example.com), March 17, 2004.
"This is why nazi ideology sucks it asks the workers to put the noose round their necks and jump in the name of the nation." Where did you ever come up with that ill-concieved assumption? If you haven't noticed, Nazi is short for "National Socialist German Worker's Party." American National Socialism is the same, because it's pro- worker. When I can't get a job anywhere because there are illegal border-hoppers in my town in every single entry-level job position, that's what angers me. I'm also angered by the manager who has the nerve to hire illegals or even legals for an illegal wage. Please get your facts straight when you argue.
-- Tim (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 18, 2004.
The reason why you can't get a job is due to the nature of capitalism, its seeks to create better and better profits and so it creates divisions. Paying 'illegals' means you have to compete with bottom 'dollar' wages. Push wages down to keep profits up. So how can you side with american business and workers at the same time?
NASDP National Arbeiter Soclistmus Deutche Party or Nazi or the national german worker socialist party. very contradictory, is it for the national interest or the workers' interest, is nationalism against socialism or internationalism. And after Hitler came to power he ditched the workers bit the SA. The SA was no better than a glorified soup kitchen, that gave a man shelter food and a uniform with a doctorine, a Nazi party member would lead the house and 'educate' the SA member(s). However after the Night of the Long Knives in 1934, Hitler distrusted the SA and attacked them, locking up its leaders and during his parades after 1934 the SS stood between Hitler and the SA. A symbolic but real barrier, that the working class has nothing to do or gain from Nazism but to stand and stare.
Ask yourself what makes your life more shite, the illegals or the occupation of Iraq? I hate the way Blair has pushed our soliders into a meat grinder and the casualties are not that big compared to the US casualties. The wealth spent by the US military could go and make millions of lives happy. Nothing justifies $396 billion dollars of war 'toys'. It out strips the next 9 defence budgets put together. Where is your living standard going, its being blasted over Iraq. The Racism at the heart of Nazism is the enemy of the working class and an ally of the bosses.
-- Richard Stephens (email@example.com), March 19, 2004.
I don't know where you got the assumption that I support the war in Iraq.
-- Tim (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 19, 2004.
"I WOULD LOVE TO KILL HITLER IF I HAD THE CHANCE. I WORLD SHASH HIS RISTS WITH A RUSTY KNIFE. THEN I WOULD MAKE HIM DRINK HIS OWN BLOOD AND PISS. THEN I WOULD KICK A FIELD GOLE WITH HIM" I assume you'd do all that after you learned to spell?
-- Tim (email@example.com), March 26, 2004.
Hitler himself was indeed not the cause of the Holocaust. The events that took place would most likely not be effected by the death of a "baby hitler". Let me explain my reasoning: After the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, the ranks of the German Army felt completely betrayed, as is easily observed from the "Stabbed in the Back" propaganda movement. The majority of non-judaist military veterans in post-WWI Germany were anti-semitic. Adolf Hitler was simply a man that consildated the ideas and hopes of those around him into a vision for the future. Simply put, even if Hitler never existed, some other person would have done the exact same thing as him----the only difference would have been cosmetic----perhaps a different name than the "Nazi Party" (later; after Socialist Worker's Party), and a symbol other than the swastika (which is simply a crooked Germanic tribal symbol). So, no, I would not terminate "baby hitler", because it would accomplish little to nothing.
-- Michael J. Nelson Jr. (Randaldanteclerk@aol.com), April 01, 2004.
**Correction of a Spelling mistake in my previous post ---Line 4 should read "consolidated" instead of "consildated"
-- Michael J. Nelson Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org), April 01, 2004.
anal sex is fun. i love it!!!!!!!! chocolate coated dick is yummy!!! hitler is cool. i went back in time and voted for hitler.
-- ben read (email@example.com), April 13, 2004.
Definately as he tried to wipe out the jew scum from the world. HAIL HITLER!
-- Dirk Hughes (firstname.lastname@example.org), April 17, 2004.
I dont think he was evil. HE WAS DOING WHAT HE FELT WAS RIGHT and that was evil Yet, he did for his country. They agreed with him He had the support of the people. HOW CAN HE BE DOING WHAT HE FELT WAS RIGHT...YET ALSO BE EVIL? I dont think evil can be explained.
-- Nick (email@example.com), April 19, 2004.
In 1999 I wrote a short story, "The Death of Baby Hitler", published in the January 2000 Launchpad scifi mag. In it, I explored what might of happened if, through time travel, someone had gone back (two people in my story) and ensured that Hitler died in his crib as a one-year-old. Millions would not have died, if Hitler had been killed as a baby, but the world would not, in my opinion, be any the less evil for it. Humans have committed, do commit and will commit evil and slaughter millions, regardless of the politicians in power.
-- stanley warren (firstname.lastname@example.org), May 30, 2004.
no baby hitler was mad CUTE
-- Dorian Salas (email@example.com), June 07, 2004.
ANYONE THAT SAYS THEY WOULD KILL A INNOCENT BABY, EVEN THOUGHT YOU KNEW WAT HE DONE IN THE FUTURE, CAN GO FUCK YOUSELVES! LONG LIVE "A.H"
-- "A.H" (firstname.lastname@example.org), June 09, 2004.
and anther thing, allison ross of australia is a fucking lesbian, makes great porn!
-- fuck u ally (email@example.com), June 15, 2004.
Hitler was a very very naughty man
-- butt hole (firstname.lastname@example.org), June 15, 2004.