Sysops please clarify once and for all that I am NOT LadyLogic : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

I have no clue how this got started, but there are posters (eyespye, netghost, etc.) here who are convinced that I am Ladylogic. Now I can think of worse things to be called, but I can't take the credit here. So please, I'm sure that you have a way of knowing (IP address?), can you help? Thanks...Cin

-- cin (, February 21, 2000


The IP number associated with the handle "cin" is not the same as the IP number associated with the handle "LadyLogic."

-- (poor old@tired.sysop), February 21, 2000.

THANK YOU! I'll never ask for anything ever again =)

-- cin (, February 21, 2000.


(((Now I can think of worse things to be called than Lady Logic)))

As far as this forum is concerned, I doubt it.

-- elskon (, February 21, 2000.

I have a friend who has 4 different IP addresses. But these are interesting threads nevertheless:

Re: Netghost, allow me to prove to you that I am NOT cinloo...

Posted by ( Netghost on January 17, 2000 at 18:43:26:

In Reply to: Netghost, allow me to prove to you that I am NOT cinloo... posted by Ladylogic on January 17, 2000 at 14:02:22:


You admitted to being cinloo when I first called you on it at TB2k, and you have used that as a part of your handle.... Lady Logic (cinloo)@ , here or on The Forum.

Personaly I don't mind you stating your opinion on The Forum, just knock off the spam and DOS attacks and I'll leave you alone.... or you can continue your ways, and I'll "out" you... For Real ;-)

More on Cinloo:

At the urging of LL.... : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

I am posting this letter that I have just received from LL. It seems to bother her that people are getting us confused for the other or something like that. Thanks, and sorry for the off-topic...Cin

Hi Cinloo,

Someone over at DeBunkers thinks you and I are the same person.. (Some people get so confused on the internet!)

Would you please post something at TimeBomb saying that we are indeed two different women? (If you post it at TimeBomb the "Netghost" will see it, and furthermore, when it stays up, will be proof that you are not me, because I get deleted in a heartbeat!)

I don't know if it would be confusing or not, but I suppose you could even post this e-mail?

Thanks, Ladylogic

-- Cin (, January 17, 2000

If you get here, Welcome {{{{Cinloo}}}}!!

Posted by ( Ladylogic on January 11, 2000 at 20:42:19:

Hi Cin,

I have to tell ya I have always appreciated the way you stuck up for me on TB. In particular, I remember when some zombie called me trash, and you said, "one man's trash is another mans treasure". That was so sweet! (Not that what that goofball said made any difference, it was just nice that you had the backbone to stand up for me.)

I also remember you told someone I was "pretty". I don't know how you know that from my writing, but I appreciate the thought. (By the way, some people think I'm very pretty.)

Oh, yeah! I just remembered, you recognized that there are people on that board that worship Yourdon. That's twisted and you had the guts to say so. When I read that, I punched the air with my fist and said, "Right on! We have another DeBunker!"

Welcome to our world, Cin.

Feel free to post here & TimeBomb or anywhere else you want. I'd be proud to talk to you anywhere, anytime.

Love, Laura



According to NetGhost, Laura admitted to being cinloo. If one wants to take the time and go over DeBunker's, there's more references there referring to cinloo. You be the judge. Here's just a sample among others.

-- EyeSpy (EyeSpy@eyespyyy.xcom), February 21, 2000.

Sorry Cin,

LL once referenced you as part of her handle on De Bunker, before you startd to post here...... might I suggest you pick your freinds better? :-)

-- Netghost (ng@no.yr), February 21, 2000.

Eye spy,

I contacted the Syops of this forum about a month ago that I thought LL, cinloo, and I'm so are all the same troll...... I've been wrong before, and will be again.. but that doesn't stop me from thinking :-)

-- Netghost (ng@no.yr), February 21, 2000.

Some things go "poof" watch your friends, who watch their six. . May Heaven, help us all ( watch how fast this post disappears.) Experienced at more than "P00F".

-- Here To Stand (, February 21, 2000.

Bring the broom from the wicked witch of the west [LL] and then we will believe you are not her....

-- The Wizard (, February 21, 2000.

From: Y2K, ` la Carte by Dancr (pic), near Monterey, California

It is not possible to prove by IP that two AOL users are distinct because each account may have multiple "screen names" and because IPs are assigned dynamically. Thus, each time someone connects they get a new number, and later in the day somebody else will get that number.

Having a letter proves nothing, too, since those can easily be faked.

Why do you care? You're not being banned. Bringing it up only convinces more people that you're the same. Give it up.

-- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), February 21, 2000.

Dancr you ARE correct BUT the IP's USUALLY have some representative similarity, and here, the way the Net is structured, i'd say she was quite a ways from LL, net distance wise.


-- Chuck, a night driver (, February 21, 2000.

From: Y2K, ` la Carte by Dancr (pic), near Monterey, California

AOL's dynamic addressing system does not have a geographic component, at least not one that has been detected by users of Internet Relay Chat, who are often quite eager to ban particular AOL users from their channels, nor by server administrators (so-called IRCops) who wish to prevent them from using their servers. Thus, you will see broad bans against AOL on many channels and on almost all servers.

AOL finally had to resort to getting their own servers for AOL users. Then, they made the mistake of not making those servers open to the public. This encouraged other servers to not remove their AOL bans, because of AOL's lack of reciprocity.

-- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), February 21, 2000.

My Gawd!!!!

Even the sysops telling you, and you still do not believe. So, what's next, DNA test? Completely ridiculous. You haven't the slightest idea what you are talking about and to me, you seem a complete FOOL.

Eyespy, perhaps you are watching too many espionage movies. Is your life this dull that you have to create extracurricular excitement? Well I should be flattered that you have included me in your little fantasy, but I'M NOT! And just how much time DO you have on your hands anyway?

Dancr, I'm not quite sure what to say to you, but the "C" word comes to mind. (yea, that's the one).

I am going to ignore any further idiotic comments of this kind. You're not worth any more of my time.

-- cin (, February 21, 2000.

I haven't created anything about you, I have only reposted what has been posted either here or on another website. What I do with my free time is my business not yours. I don't fantacize about you or anyone else, I just post information. LL is always flattered too when people talk about her, no wonder you two seem so much alike. Let the reader read the posts and they can decide for themselves.

-- Eye Spy (Eyespy@eyespyyy.xcom), February 21, 2000.

From: Y2K, ` la Carte by Dancr (pic), near Monterey, California

As I said earlier, it doesn't make any difference if they're the same person or not. They're both foul mouthed raging peas in a pod. I have not said that these are the same person; only that the evidence presented is not conclusive.

One thing that I have learned after five years on Internet Relay Chat [IRC] is that people who have some driving need to be disruptive will, when banned, find a way to return in a disguise. Sometimes we recognize them for who they are, but let them stay, as a way of letting them get off on another foot. They hardly ever fail to soon make themselves unwelcome, and eventually "lose it" to the point that there is no doubt of their identity. A leopard cannot change its spots.

-- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), February 22, 2000.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ