Can 'real' fashion be done with a 'glamour'-type model?

greenspun.com : LUSENET : People Photography : One Thread

A lot of my models just do not look like fashion models; they look more like glamour models or actors (whatever an actor looks like?). I've done a lot to try to capture them in a 'fashion' spirit anyways; but most of the time when I try to do this I don't get what anyone doing real fashion for a living would call 'a fashion photo'; I end up with more of a celebrity portraiture kind of shot, bordering on I guess what you'd call glamour.

Should I only be shooting fashion-types if I want a fashion photo, and start learning a little about celebrity portraiture/glamour/etc? I'm asking this not on a 'do whatever you like' basis, but more of a 'could I ever be taken seriously in the professional world' basis...

Thanks people. shawn

-- shawn gibson (shawngibson_prophoto@yahoo.com), February 11, 2000

Answers

Should I only be shooting fashion-types if I want a fashion photo, and start learning a little about celebrity portraiture/glamour/etc? I'm asking this not on a 'do whatever you like' basis, but more of a 'could I ever be taken seriously in the professional world' basis...
in my personal opinion, there is a big difference between fashion models and glamour models, and there are very few women who can pull both off.
for professional purposes i believe it's important to segregate the two.

-- Edward Kang (ekang@cse.nd.edu), February 11, 2000.

Edward Kang wrote; "...and there are very few women who can pull both off."

Some follow-up questions I would like to ask is:
What exactly does it mean to "pull off" the fashion look?
Is it the model?
Is it the way the shot is made?

I am interested in this since I have struggled with the same questions, and as I look back at the shots in my portfolio I've realized that much of it borders between portraiture and fashion. (well maybe this couldn't be helped since the bulk of my work last year was shooting model portfolios for aspiring fashion models)

The partial answers I have come up with are
1) EYE CONTACT...this isn't as critical in a fashion shot as it is in portraiture.
2) In a fashion shot, the model is practically "acting", and the photographer is the director as opposed to the "trying to capture the essence of the person" approach of portaiture (though if you look at the celebrity shots of Mark Seliger, then the lines get very, very blurred don't they?)
3) In the fashion shot, the emphasis is on the clothes - the forms, lines, and color they create along with the body of the model, or, in the absence of any - the attitude.
4) Richard Avedon says "Sell the dream" when it comes to fashion photography. so maybe 'pulling it off' means making a viewer think "I want to look like that. I want to live the life she lives. What else does she do (given the context of the picture and the fantasy built around it)"

Question is: can this be pulled off with a model not incredibly tall, shapely, and beautiful? Does it have to do with the percieved image of what a fashion model should look like?

Oddly enough, I AM sure of is that a lot of it has to do with the skill of the model in "projecting" or "acting", the clothes she's wearing, how she's posed and how the light/environment interplays with her, and the skill of the stylist/make-up/hair artist.

It would be interesting to see someone like Avedon tasked to shoot Versace with a "glamour type model" and see how he does it.

-- Tommy Zablan (lensman49@hotmail.com), February 12, 2000.


Well look what happens when you see Madonna or Courtney Love in a fashion photo. It looks different, even though it still looks like Avedon, or whoever. It still looks like a real fashion photo, sort of, but maybe because we equate a certain style with fashion I just started seeing Avedon's blown-out backdrops as 'portraiture'; until now even if it was an old man I sort of thought of it as a bastardized fashion photo...). And these celeb-as-fashion-model shots always jump out at me as be anomolies when I'm flicking through a magazine.

I don't know what I'm adding here, just noting what I see.

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.


Shawn:

Are these "real fashion" shoots you're doing? If so, what do the stylists and designers think of the images?

If not, this seems like a logical next step. Find yourself an aspiring designer and try shooting their outfits rather than the models.

Also, since most of the discussion seems to center on "girls" or how women look, try shooting with men and see if you come closer to that look.

Brian

-- Brian Yarvin (byarvin@mindspring.com), February 12, 2000.


No. Most of my stuff ends up not looking like fashion per se. But I've started using a good make-up person and I'm really concentrating on the shape of thing. I want to shoot with the make-up guy, a hair person, and a lady I'm being put into contact with who is a designer; I want them all on the set and I want all of their experience. We are going to do a shoot with 2 girls and a guy in a rented hotel room. I think this is the kind of thing which will make a big difference, the participation of a number of people whose main aim is STRICT fashion, as opposed to me who loves fashion but am approaching my photography from too many angles, ending up with unfocused garbaldy goop.

I have no problem shooting men; but most of the time when I ask, men get wierded out a lot more easily than women for some reason. I'm going to start concentrating my efforts on real models with agencies and experience, even if I have to pay. The poise and professionalism of everyone involved is probably what makes the biggest difference.

what do you think Brian?

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.



Shawn:

It sounds to me like you're spending way too much time thinking about models and nowhere near enough about the rest of the shoot.

There are all sorts of people modeling today and you should be prepared to make fashion photos of all of them. (since that's your career goal)

Try the designer thing. Meet them and see the clothes and go from there - this is the way real fashion shoots are done. And for that matter, this is how real fashion photographers get work!

I suggest you don't pay models unless you have paying work, this will create far more problems than it will solve.

Brian

-- Brian Yarvin (byarvin@mindspring.com), February 12, 2000.


Tommy says:
Question is: can this be pulled off with a model not incredibly tall, shapely, and beautiful?

It can, but it is tougher.

Does it have to do with the percieved image of what a fashion model should look like?

I'm sure it has quite a bit to do with what we "perceive" as fashion model-esque.

Brian says:
It sounds to me like you're spending way too much time thinking about models and nowhere near enough about the rest of the shoot.

I agree. Tommy nailed it on the head when he said:

3) In the fashion shot, the emphasis is on the clothes - the forms, lines, and color they create along with the body of the model, or, in the absence of any - the attitude.

To add Brian's idea, it also includes location, background, and most importantly - lighting.

I still stand behind the fact that finding good fashion models is difficult - and still is the first problem. One interesting exercise is to simply head to your local upscale mall, walk around, and window shop. On any given saturday, the mall will be brimming with folk. Keep your eye out for people who strike you visually. The kind of people who you notice and then say, "wow, that person looks like a fashion model."

One thing you will notice is that these people are in a severe minority. They will have their clothing tastefully chosen, with colors (if any besides black) that match. Accessories will be matching and in place. They will exude "fashion" to you. Their faces and skulls will complement their bodies and their clothing.

Now you have found a fashion model. It is up to you if you want to approach them and ask if they would like to model. However, a slightly more practical thing to do is to examine your own reaction to their appearance. What made you think that they were fashion-esque? What about their appearance and clothing gave you such a strong impression? Take these things and write them down, and then apply them to your growing body of knowledge about fashion.

i really do think that fashion is still portraiture. As a result, the model and his/her clothing can stand alone. This is why Avedon could do some of his fashion work on pure white backgrounds. This makes your job as a photographer harder - but this is also why there are "glamour shots" shops in every mall in the US, but not a single "high fashion shots" shop anywhere.

-- Edward Kang (ekang@cse.nd.edu), February 12, 2000.

This is prob'ly the most personally important thing I've posted. I'm taking all of this to heart, starting with Try the designer thing. Meet them and see the clothes and go from there - this is the way real fashion shoots are done. And for that matter, this is how real fashion photographers get work! .

Continuing with Richard Avedon says "Sell the dream" when it comes to fashion photography. so maybe 'pulling it off' means making a viewer think 'I want to look like that. I want to live the life she lives. What else does she do (given the context of the picture and the fantasy built around it)'.

And ending (appropriately) with "i really do think that fashion is still portraiture. As a result, the model and his/her clothing can stand alone. This is why Avedon could do some of his fashion work on pure white backgrounds. This makes your job as a photographer harder - but this is also why there are "glamour shots" shops in every mall in the US, but not a single "high fashion shots" shop anywhere".

Thanks guy. I'm gonna start searching out designers. Ryerson Polytechnic, which has a fashion design program, is probably the best place to start, and maybe some small, less-snobish agencies who themselves are starting out?

shawn

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.


Hey Shawn...how about trying to shoot some fashion with no models at all? Just still lifes of the clothes?

Have agencies in Vancouver been "snobby" with you? I'm sorry to hear this. I think they'd have a different attitude entirely if you didn't act like you depended on them...shoot some great images for the hot local designers and/or boutiques and they'll be lining up to provide you with people. Act like you need them to make your career and they will crush you.

Also...I suspect that when you make contact with the designers, they'll know people who can model their clothes.

Give it a try!

-- Brian Yarvin (byarvin@mindspring.com), February 12, 2000.


Well, no one in Vancouver has been snobby with me cuz I live in Toronto, a hop skip and a REEEAAALLLYYY LLLOOONNNGGG jump away...

Actually no one has been snobby with me; most of what I believe about agencies is based on hearsay from friends and shop talk in the camera places/labs. The only agency I've delt with personally has been very nice to me, maybe because I'm shooting for free. We'll see what happens when the agency actually sees my results and I tell them I either want to get paid from now on or at least have them/the model pay for all supplies; everything minus time and labour.

I'm only half an hour away from the fashion district in Toronto; I actually work about a 5minute walk away from it. It's time to swallow my pride, get ready for some harsh criticism, and get out there...

You've been an inspiration Brian. Thanks (and everyone else...). shawn

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.



extrapolating all this new stuff, i bet the model will matter a lot less if everything else is put into place and clearly demarked "fashion...".

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.

I still stand behind the fact that finding good fashion models is difficult - and still is the first problem. One interesting exercise is to simply head to your local upscale mall, walk around, and window shop. On any given saturday, the mall will be brimming with folk. Keep your eye out for people who strike you visually. The kind of people who you notice and then say, "wow, that person looks like a fashion model."

So that's how I became an alcoholic!!! (just kidding). Should'a been going to malls, not bars!!!

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 12, 2000.


I thought the latest thing in fashion photography was using "normal" people (the Gap and Levi TV commercials)... t

-- tom meyer (twm@mindspring.com), February 12, 2000.

Yeah. You're right. I think that just furthers the whole idea that its everything else which counts more than the model. I think what this really boils down to is focus and effort.

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 13, 2000.

...and trust in the fact that, if I use a good team and remain focused on taking a fashion photo, any atypical-ness of the model just won't matter. I think in that sense I've been quite conservative.

-- shawn gibson (SeeInsideForever@yahoo.com), February 13, 2000.


I thought the latest thing in fashion photography was using "normal" people (the Gap and Levi TV commercials)...

Esprit started this a number of years ago. I don't know if it's still being done, but all the models in Esprit ads were employees or relatives of employees.

I know someone Levi has been using recently (don't know if she's done TV, but she's been in print and on the web site) and she is a professional model.

-- Jeff Spirer (jeffs@hyperreal.org), February 13, 2000.


Just because an ad campaign is using "Normal" people, doesn't mean that you can transform anyone into a fashion model.

Rarely are those people "Normal". They are chosen from a field of possible models by the photographer who has a vision of how he wants the model to interact with the clothing to create an image. The process is selective and i stress again, it is the photographer that has to be able to envision what he wants the model and clothing to do. There is no formula for this except for careful examination and experience.

I hate to use Avedon as a swinging pole, but his early fashion was really pretty much "glamour shooting". There was a transition in there somewhere and part of it was his growth as a photographer.

I may get railed on for this, but: there's good fashion photography and there's bad fashion photography, and I believe what makes up the bulk of the difference isn't anything beyond the photographer and the model/clothing.

Anyways, my opinions aside, I think you've already been given a lot of good advice to go on, Shawn. Take your vision and run with it!

-- Edward Kang (ekang@cse.nd.edu), February 13, 2000.

We seem to be on parallel courses here. I long ago decided that there was no point in shooting glamour models for a fashion portfolio. Your picture is only as good as the weakest of its parts. If you want to be a fashion photographer, you've got to be able to duplicate _exactly_ what your clients see in Vogue and Elle - and that starts with the model.

I was lucky to find a girl going to a nearby college that had a true fashion look (and was 6' tall!) who wanted to work for prints. That let me put together a decent first portfolio. I can use that to get good models and makeup artists. (I'm not really looking for paying work yet - I have a day job.) I also got a loan against my house so I can afford to spend a few thousand dollars putting together a pilot issue for an online music/fashion magazine. Even if I don't get investors, I'll have an outstanding way to showcase my skills. I'm using a variety of exotic and fashion look models - and if necessary, I'll spend the $600 to get a really good local model for the day. (E-mail me if you'd like to contribute something.)

By the way, fashion isn't about the clothes - catalog work is. As you note, it's the fantasy that we're selling. And the problem with designers is the same as with models (and makeup artists) - if they aren't top notch, then it will show in your pictures. You need to be extremely selective in what you shoot for your portfolio.

-- John Kantor (jkantor@mindspring.com), February 17, 2000.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ