STRATFOR: United States Tests Russian Limits

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread



0010 GMT, 000204  United States Tests Russian Limits

Link
The USS Monterrey, a U.S. Navy cruiser, detained a Russian oil tanker Feb. 2 in the Gulf of Oman on suspicion of smuggling Iraqi oil in violation of U.N. sanctions. U.S. naval personnel boarded the tanker and then diverted its course for inspection. This is first time in 18 months that a Russian vessel has been boarded on suspicion of breaking the sanctions, according to The Associated Press. However, the interdiction of the vessel is less about oil and more about defining the relationship between the United States and the post-Yeltsin Russian government.

The interception of the tanker, the Volgo-Neft-147, was a calculated political decision. Sanction busters smuggle hundreds of thousands of tons of oil out of Iraq each year, much of it under flags of convenience. But the United States monitored the movements of the Volgo-Neft for some time, according to Agence France-Presse. This suggests a conscious decision to follow the Russian-flagged vessel, with sufficient time to decide how to respond and to warn Russia against taking on Iraqi oil.

Nearly a month before the Volgo-Neft was interdicted, the United States contacted Russia, according to the State Department, most likely in hopes of quietly resolving the situation. These talks trickled up to the highest levels; U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright reportedly raised the subject during her meetings in Moscow this week, apparently with little success.

In sum, the United States had plenty of time to single out the Russian vessel, follow it and warn the Russians against breaking the sanctions and make the political decision to intercept it after the Russians attempted to call the U.S. bluff. This was a decision by the United States to ratchet up the confrontation, probing the Russian political will to see just how Moscow will react.

The United States appears to be testing the limits of its relationship with the new Russian government, and to see how it has changed under acting President Vladimir Putin. The United States attempted to assert its dominance in the Persian Gulf by quietly pressuring the Russians into halting the vessel. When the Russians rejected the pressure, the United States thrust the confrontation into the public eye, ironically making it more difficult for Russia to back down.

The question now is how the Russians will respond while caught red-handed. Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev bristled at the fact that a Russian trading vessel was intercepted by American military ships, reported Agence France-Presse. Deputy Foreign Minister Vasily Seredin demanded the immediate release of the tanker, according to Interfax news agency. It appears the Russians have chosen to play up the incident and possibly use it to attack the United States policy on Iraq and the Middle East. This again, is a test to define the new parameters of the relationship.

) 2000 WNI, Inc. All rights reserved

-- Possible Impact (posim@hotmail.com), February 03, 2000

Answers

Related thread: Link

-- Possible Impact (posim@hotmail.com), February 03, 2000.

We're on the cusp of a catastrophic petroleum shortage, complaining that the Iraq is not producing its full quota, and then we interdict a shipment because of a paperwork violation?

Makes a lot of sense.

-- human bean (how@dee.pod), February 03, 2000.


human bean,

You missed the entire point of this post. It makes perfect sense, and is indicative of just how proactive our Pentagon really is about remaining the dominant superpower in the World.

-- Hawk (flyin@high.again), February 03, 2000.


Excellent post !

-- snooze button (alarmclock_2000@yahoo.com), February 04, 2000.

What I am wondering is who is testing whom.

I agree with Stratfor that this was a calculated decision by the Pentagon. I also have come to credit Stratfor with some pretty solid intel connections. Yet, if it is true that other Sov tankers have been tracked and positively identified as heading for Iraq (*), given the time required to move tankers around, whose was the opening play?

* See: http: hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002UCq

-- Redeye in Ohio (cannot@work.com), February 04, 2000.



wag the dog--create a diversionary incident to keep the public's attention focused elsewhere...

-- Carl Jenkins (Somewherepress@aol.com), February 04, 2000.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ