OT-missle interceptor test

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

What the hell is going on? Since when does a nation announce to the world that it is going to have a test of one of its major defensive systems and invite the world press to cover it? This whole test had to be a farce. It does not stand up to scrutiny, that a nation would give its enemies comfort in knowing that we are defenseless against its missles. What do you think the reasoning is behind this dog and pony show? It reminds me of when the pentagon was informing the world about the number of cruise missles we had left in our inventory after using so many on Kosovo and Iraq. That was B.S. too. Shouldn't all this info about our weapons systems functionality and inventory be a secret?

-- Lenny (chmielecki@worldnet.att.net), January 19, 2000

Answers

Only caught part of this story on the morning news -- very, very strange.

-- Lurkess (Lurkess@Lurking.Net), January 19, 2000.

Perhaps the Chinese have a contractual right to know?

-- Ron Schwarz (rs@clubvb.com.delete.this), January 19, 2000.

The only secrets our country deems important to keep these days involve the personal activities of the CINC!!

Ray

-- Ray (ray@totacc.com), January 19, 2000.


Ray...if only!

-- number six (#@#.com), January 19, 2000.

It is common knowledge among all the powers of the world that the US does NOT have an anti-ballistic missile defense system... the Pentagon made this public to gain support for the project that would have gone online by 2003-- if the test had succeeded.

Only russia has a somewhat ragged ballistic missile defense system...

Noswad

-- Noswad (KeepAnEye@russia.com), January 19, 2000.



---wish I had posted this earlier, but I fully expected the test to "fail". The king and his globalist buds needed a further excuse to delay any sort of missile defense. first they picked the wrong way to go about it(chemical rockets as opposed to energy weapons), then this setup "test" for media/public consumption.

We're getting "set up" for a first strike, at least all the indicators appear to point that way.

Anyone like a known authoritie's audio viewpoint on this, listen to the jan 3rd mcalvany intel report with joel skousen as guest. Most enlightening.

-- zog (zoggy@yahoo.com), January 19, 2000.


Zog.... You are more right than you know.

-- Noswad (KeepAnEye@russia.com), January 19, 2000.

"Anyone like a known authoritie's audio viewpoint on this, listen to the jan 3rd mcalvany intel report with joel skousen as guest. Most enlightening. "

How do I do this? Link? I wish someone would transcribe these fascinating interviews (such as on Art Bell, Sightings, etc.) I can speed-read but I can't easily speed-listen. Plus others can overhear what I'm listening to.

-- Cee Bee (ceebee@hotmail.com), January 19, 2000.


--Here you go, Cee Bee, the link to january 3rd show with Joel Skousen, a direct real audio hotlink. If you don't have the player here is the link to download the player from real audio

Sorry about no transcripts, I can struggle out maybe 15 wds a minnit with these broken up in a wild youth hands! HAHAHAHA! In other typed words, I stink! as in real slow...hehehehehehehe where's them star trek puters yet? the kind ya walk up to and say "COMPUTER!" and it answers back "WORKING!"

-- zog (slowtypin@plentyoftypos.too), January 19, 2000.


Hey guys, no price is too high to keep one in office for the third term. Whats a little ol war, why shucks look what you get in return, a WILD WILD" guy. A little ole war is nothing in comparison to the bargain. Whats a few million lives when the world is blessed with Bill? You should be glad that he is willing to go the extra mile, he is sacrificing so much himself. My MY I am surprised at your attitude.

-- Notforlong (Fsur@aol.com), January 19, 2000.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ