please check

-- (please @delete.them), September 13, 1999

Answers

I'm not a sysop, but am I missing something, or are you just being a wise guy? Maybe the poster asked the question a second time because they wern't happy with the first answer. There were several threads, and the first answer is only one of them. I'ld like to help, but I can't find them either! <:)=

-- Sysman (y2kboard@yahoo.com), September 13, 1999.

I found them, if you wouold just to the archives, and scroll way down to there are 4 pertaining to c4i:

c4i is bogus

Pageging c4i...Answer please

cKi: How might you wish us best respond to your disclosures?

Why I think C4i is a Doomer Troll

If you click onto the last one, Ashton & Leska gives 3 links to what you are looking for. Maybe the Linkmeister will link it...I'm not a linkster, just a surfer. Hey, sniff and you shall find.

-- sniff surfer (sniffsurfer@sniffsurfer.com), September 13, 1999.

Why on earth would we delete them?

The "real" c4i was was quite plausible, the "fake" one, was someone else playing a game. So many fascinating dot gov and dot mil folks came out of the woodwork to try to throw ice water on c4i's original statements. Rather like the recent Navy pentagon scramble with the Jim Lord post.

Diane

-- Diane J. Squire (sacredspaces@yahoo.com), September 13, 1999.

Maybe the real one was taken out because he gave to much info and replaced, who knows. But he sure had it right about DEE CEE.

-- ?? (???@???.com), September 14, 1999.