MARP Tournament - are we using a minimum game requirement?

greenspun.com : LUSENET : MAME Action Replay : One Thread

Yes - I know - it's weird that I'm asking this question - but I have a question for yall - Pat brought it up that the minimum games requirement is in effect for this tournament - or at least that's what I'm observing - I INTENDED for this rule to go into next tournament(it's probably how I'm going to keep it) - I didn't want to have mounds of protest for changing the rules of the current tournament :) - so what do yall think? Should we put the requirement in now or later?

Should the one recording / tournament rule also go into the current tournament? See above for why I didn't put this in the current tournament...

-- Gameboy9 (goldengameboy@yahoo.com), August 09, 1999

Answers

My vote is for next tournament.

Stig

-- Stig Remnes (sremnes@hotmail.com), August 09, 1999.


Here are my personal feelings: Any rule proposed should have to go into effect the next available tourney run by the same person. It is simply not fair to all players if you change the rule in mid- stream of the competition. We are within a month of finish, or is that 22, never mind on that, but it's like trying to change directions while paddling in the river. It doesn't work. 2> BBH< I am suprised you like something I proposed (The 2020 Super Baseball Scoring System). I can go and do similiar for all sports games to put them on an level footing and full game play, if players would like. 3. Nobody better get in my Relief Pitcher way, I loved that game, and now, since it's with the MAME, I'm going to camp out in baseball heaven. HEHEHEHEHE. BTW - To put an end to the MPE Question, the max pts available is 64. It will not go higher. (How do I know??? Got a hold of a machine and did a complete dump! That was fun! It uses a single hexidecimal data space for each of the four point sections... Maximum available per section is 16. The machine I dumped had a first place max chain of 21! Still only got 16pts for the feat! That was a remarkable thing to watch!

-- Chris Parsley (cparsley1@hotmail.com), August 09, 1999.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ