Black Helicopters?? : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

I thought all this black helicopter talk was crap. Well--I don't think this anymore. Today I saw eight black helicopters all unmarked and equipped with FLIR systems parked on top of the Dallas Convention Center. When they left they were accompanied by a military UH-60. Wouldn't wonder about one or two of these----but eight?????

-- M. Jewell (, August 03, 1999


Black Helicopters iH

-- Deborah (, August 03, 1999.

You people are funny sometimes. You know, God forbid the SWAT teams and special forces guys acutally get a little time in the field training for hostage situations. What the hell do we pay them for anyway? To sit around and LOOK dangerous to terrorists?

-- I guess you can call me a DGI (Cause @ I sure. don't "get it"???), August 03, 1999.

I should have specified that I posted that link to establish the existence of Black Helicopters. Not that I think there is a big conspiracy.

Many people do not believe they exist period.

-- Deborah (, August 03, 1999.

White vehicles AND black helicopters!!!!!!!!!

Whoaaaaa Nellie!!!!!!!!

Things are indeedy heating up aren't they!!!!

I must say, all the evidence is piling up...........

Say, wouldn't it be weird if someone out there spotted a red motorcycle or a blue skateboard!!!!!!! That would absolutely PROVE that the feds are going to declare martial law and sell us all to the UN wouldn't it!!!!!! WOW!!!!!!!!

Please send in your reports about the motorcycles and skateboards so we can mount an absolutely air-tight case against the Pollies.......

-- Craig (, August 03, 1999.

No conspiracy intent intended--just information. I am an aviator and am quite familiar with typical law enforcement machines. These were not law enforcement. The ballast mounted sighting systems are for missile sighting and no N numbers or identification numbers on military types is a bit unusual. Not a normal thing to be seeing in a populous sych as DFW.

-- M. Jewell (, August 03, 1999.

regardless of what ever conspiracy theory might exist, the bottom line is that (according to the Naval War College and the Government) the "Y2k conversion period" begins Septmember 1.

They must have contingencies...just in case.

Wouldn't that be prudent?

Thanks M.J.



-- Michael Taylor (, August 03, 1999.

M Jewell.....

Craig is just a two-faced, mealy mouth polly, who thinks he is cute. You can find him all over the map on issues and usually lined-up with other well known butt wipes of his ilk. He just can't tear himself away from this forum because he has no real life to go to. Lonely little word wimp looking for attention and he gets it....get it?

-- For (, August 03, 1999.

OHHHHHH, Craig's gonna get it, alright! Stuffed into one of his many orifices approximately 5 months from now. (or in the case of martial law....much, much sooner)


-- Will continue (, August 03, 1999.

"He just can't tear himself away from this forum because he has no real life to go to. "

Does that statement also apply to the "doomers" who frequent the forum or is there some double standard in place?

-- Ha ha! (, August 03, 1999.

Bonehead 'For' and Motormouth 'Will Continue'...........

You amuse me. Do you somehow think you look tough by shooting off insults? Seriously, if you are afraid to use your real name and email address then you're just plain old chicken shit cowards.

Until then, go away and sulk in the corner.......

You're absolutely right, I have argued both sides of the issue from time to time. Why, because there are two sides to it. It's called BALANCE......something which unfortunately is in short supply here!

-- Craig (, August 04, 1999.

I wonder if many posters slept through every history class,...well, maybe not...if it was the watered-down-feel-good-politically-correct revisionist version, in which case I can understand the lack of perspective and discernment displayed. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist or nutso to appreciate that we are not immune from historical patterns. Nations rise and fall. Why? Dig out some history books. If you think America is invulnerable, then you are a Yankee-doodle- dunderhead. Instead of name-calling, please list your reasons why you believe that our country will not and could not be betrayed and/or overthrown. What do you think will happen if we "sustain" a first nuclear strike without firing back, as Clinton has ordered?

-- Mumsie (, August 04, 1999.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ