Army special forces in y2k food recce.......

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

Undercover Special Forces operatives in distribution center

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By David M. Bresnahan ) 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

Army Special Forces are engaged in a secret operation to learn how to protect food distribution centers in the event of a Y2K emergency or other disaster, according to witnesses. Information which led to the discovery of the undercover operation came from a witness who worked in the presence of the soldiers who are posing as security guards and temporary workers at one of the largest food distribution centers in the nation.

Soldiers are taking part in the exercise to prepare for the possibility they could be called on to protect food distribution warehouses around the country if a Y2K disruption causes civil unrest. They appear to be normal security guards and workers to those who see them, so it was difficult to find corroboration of the claim, which was first reported to WorldNetDaily in April.

The exercise began when the local Teamsters went on strike against the Galaxy Logistics food distribution warehouse at 1700 Elm Hill Pike, Nashville, Tenn. Temporary workers were called in to keep the very large distribution center functioning. Galaxy Logistics handles food distribution for Kroger Company.

Galaxy Logistics Inc. is based in Toronto, Canada. It was formed in 1998 and operates under Tibbett & Britten Group North America. Galaxy acquired Kroger's warehouse and entered into an exclusive, multi-year contract with the large international grocery company. Galaxy took over the contracts of an estimated 470 Teamster employees when it acquired the distribution center for an undisclosed amount in August 1998.

When the Teamsters went on strike at the end of April, temporary workers were called in to maintain operations. The temporary workers were actually brought to work and received training at least four days prior to the start of the strike. Picket lines have been peaceful and consist of only a few workers with signs, often as few as two.

AWF provides security for the large facility and put some soldiers into their company uniforms, enabling them to easily observe and learn at a time when they would not be easily detected, according to a reliable Special Forces source who has worked with WorldNetDaily on other investigative reports.

"They need information and experience in order to devise a plan to protect these facilities. It's simply a fact-finding mission," the source explained after some prompting. He was hesitant because this operation is apparently not the only one taking place, although he would not give further details.

"Ask me about something specific and I'll see what I can tell you," he stated when asked for locations of similar activities.

The soldiers are responding to orders to be prepared to protect and support critical facilities in the event of Y2K-related disruptions. Undercover forces are in the process of gathering information about those facilities now in order to have a plan in place if it is needed. "You've got the picture," he confirmed.

"Protection of food distribution centers will be critical if it gets really bad. People will be out of food within days," he explained. Although the Red Cross and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have stated they are prepared to move people to shelters within three to five days of a Y2K disaster, the source said the military believes it will take much longer and many people will be out on the streets looting and causing unrest.

A memorandum from Deputy Secretary of Defense John J. Hamre to all defense agencies spells out the need to be prepared to "respond to requests for assistance from civil authorities both domestically and overseas throughout the Y2K date transition period (defined as Sept. 1, 1999, through March 31, 2000)."

That same document, obtained by WorldNetDaily, lists the priorities for the Department of Defense, both foreign and domestic. Included under "Maintenance of public health and safety" appears the priority for "food distribution." The document also lists concerns for local fire, ambulance, police, hospitals, air traffic control, rail support, ship navigation and public information dissemination.

Suspicion was first aroused when the company which provides fork lifts to Galaxy Logistics was hired to provide training for the temporary workers. One of the trainers has military experience and noticed that some of the people he was training just "didn't fit in."

Over a period of several days of observation and making friendly conversation with the men who "didn't fit in," the trainer observed them reviewing aerial photographs of the location, hiding military clothing in a large closet or storage area, talking with each other using rank designations, and one man accidentally saluted another and was severely reprimanded for his action. Two were also seen to have concealed weapons under their coats.

When the trainer expressed his suspicions, five of six men he spoke with admitted they were from Fort Bragg Special Forces. One man who said he was a colonel and served in Vietnam, then asked the trainer many questions about his own military background since he too had served in Vietnam. That made the trainer very nervous.

The next day his concerns grew when the same colonel denied any military connections. He is known to WorldNetDaily, and the company he works for confirmed that training was provided to the workers at Galaxy Logistics. The trainer believes he may be in some danger if his name were made public.

"When I went into a back office to use the phone, there was a stack of flak jackets," he described. He said that his company was responsible for training hundreds of temporary workers how to use the forklifts at the facility. He was unable to estimate how many of the workers were military, but he did say many had a military appearance that gave them away.

The security guards and temporary workers were overheard to converse with each other about common military interests. Some were heard to comment on which base they were from. The trainer said they told him they just wanted to blend in with the other temporary workers.

The trainer also observed large 12-passenger vans used to transport many of the workers. They were fleet vehicles with government plates and military base stickers. He said the windows were blacked out. The stickers read, "Department of Defense, Ft. Bragg." Some also showed Fort Campbell or Fort Knox.

The vans were used to transport the workers and had an escort vehicle in front and in back. Drivers were in radio communication with each other and a command center using military designations and language.

The trainer was transported in one of the vans with the temporary workers.

"After being briefed on the way over on what to do if an emergency was called, I saw guards around the perimeter (dressed) in black. When I asked, the driver said they were the Tactical Response Team. When we got around the building, a shorter man came out of the rear door. He saluted and was immediately called to the side and severely scolded for saluting," the trainer described.

When he was taken inside the large facility he saw many temporary workers who had a strong military appearance. He said he was able to count at least 50.

The Galaxy Logistics food distribution center is normally protected by a private security firm, AWF. Workers contacted at the warehouse said the guards normally change on a frequent basis, so the appearance of new faces among the guards would not cause concern. The change in the security personnel would also not be noticed with so many temporary workers filling in, according to one of the sources who also witnessed a military presence.

"They're just here to learn. I don't see what's the big deal," said a woman employee contacted at the warehouse at random by phone. Identification that the request was from WorldNetDaily was given at the start of the call. She was asked why there were members of Special Forces working at the warehouse. After her response she wanted to know "who are you again?" The information was repeated and she said, "Oh, you're the press. I can't talk to you." She hung up.

Another call was placed and a different woman said, "Galaxy Logistics, Cortinay speaking." When asked if military people were present at her facility she responded, "Let me refer you to someone who could really answer that question for you." She then handed the phone to someone else.

"Good afternoon. Command post. This is Jim. How can I help you," came the voice. After giving identification and the purpose of the call, he said, "Um, I'm not at liberty to answer any of those questions." He said he would have someone call who could respond.

Galaxy Logistics public relations spokesman Bill Scher did call and said the claims were "absolutely untrue." He confirmed that AWF handles security, and he said they are not armed.

Over the weekend, WorldNetDaily informed Scher of additional information that indicated the military placed security guards and temporary workers in the facility without informing Galaxy Logistics of their presence. Scher did not dispute the possibility, but he said he did not know anything about it.

AWF has not responded to requests for information. Kroger has also not returned calls from WorldNetDaily. Teamster local president Jimmy White has not returned calls made to his office.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David M. Bresnahan, a contributing editor for WorldNetDaily.com, is the author of "Cover Up: The Art and Science of Political Deception," and offers a monthly newsletter "Talk USA Investigative Reports." He may be reached through email and also maintains a website.



-- Andy (2000EOD@prodigy.net), June 05, 1999

Answers

Too few men, too many bases to cover. My nephew is a marine. He called us last night to say they're sending him to Japan, for the second time. He's really hoping to be home for Christmas.......I'm devistated, crushed, broken hearted and I wish I could be angry so that this moment would pass into a different emotion. I want to blame someone.....but there are too many, too late. I wonder where they'll place the "y2k wall of names"

-- Will continue (farming@home.com), June 05, 1999.

Andy:

Thanks for this excellent post. It makes me think of all the DWGI's who might starve to death next year - over the years, we've heard friends and relatives refer to certain people who "died in World War II" or "died in Korea" or "died in Viet Nam" - it's chilling to think we will now have "they died in y2k."

-- Scarlett (creolady@aol.com), June 05, 1999.


wow.that was some of the best crazy-shit I've read since that bob dobbs guy.one nutbag to an other,Andy,that's some primo whack!thanks!

-- zoobie (zoobiezoob@yahoo.com), June 05, 1999.

Scarlett, are you suggesting that troops detailed to provide security to food distribution centers will hog the food for themselves, letting civilians starve?

Seems to me much more likely that the idea is to insure a relatively equitable distribution of food in case of shortages. We already know how quickly and how thoroughly an unrestrained mob can empty stores in a riot situation -- Watts, Detroit, Newark, and Los Angeles for examples.

-- Tom Carey (tomcarey@mindspring.com), June 05, 1999.


This stuff may all be true, but from an authentication perspective, the average supermarket tabloid article has just as much chance of being true.

-- Bill Byars (billbyars@softwaresmith.com), June 05, 1999.


You know Bill, I have to agree with you. It almost has as much credence as a Whitehouse press release, wouldn't you say? It's important that we ALL work really hard at making logical judgements on what we're being told about this crisis. Logical....THAT'S the key, here.

-- Will continue (farming@home.com), June 05, 1999.

Andy,

Gotta link to the article?

-- Wanda (lonevoice@mailexcite.com), June 05, 1999.


Tom Carey:

No, I was not suggesting that the security personnel would hog the food for themselves. What I am saying is this: If the government thinks the situation is serious enough to utilizie Army personnel to guard the food supply, then they must be anticipating a serious food shortage - hence, not enough food to feed everyone, and the possibility of starvation. It doesn't matter how many people are guarding the food. If there isn't enough food being produced to feed the entire population, starvation is a reality.

Scarlett

-- Scarlett (creolady@aol.com), June 05, 1999.


The next question being...What will go hand in hand with desperate, starving people? How many of our forces are protecting OTHER people, in OTHER countries? How many of our forces will be starving themselves? Are they intending to feed the needy or the needed? Will this food be distributed in government camps ONLY...what the heck IS our government doing, anyway? What ISN'T our government doing? (that one would be much easier to answer) Is there anybody home?

-- Will continue (farming@home.com), June 05, 1999.

Wanda,

yup - www.WorldNetDaily.com

-- Andy (2000EOD@prodigy.net), June 06, 1999.



* * * 19990606 Sunday

Some of you folks really don't have a grip on reality when it comes to the behavior of troops in desperate circumstances.

Have you not seen the reports of famine re: North Korea, Somalia, Hurricane Mitch, ad nausea? Food shipments to starving civilians in these circumstances were estopped by indigenous military ( official or rogue ) forces intervening in the supply lines.

US troops--well fed!--were in Somalia to open up supply lines of food to civilians.

When OUR USA troops are threatened with starvation or tired of days/weeks/months/years of MRE's, all bets are off here, too!

Open your eyes real wide... If you smell the Y2K coffee, it just may be a encampment next door of USA GI's (?) with their lastest ( "Mad Max" ) spoils.

Historically, and without exception, military organizations depend on perpetuation of the government power and financial hand that "feed" them. Universal truism.

Get over it!... Then move on...

Regards, Bob Mangus

* * *

-- Robert Mangus (rmangus@hotmail.com), June 06, 1999.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ