How do you enlarge your negatives for palladium prints?

greenspun.com : LUSENET : B&W Photo - Printing & Finishing : One Thread

I enjoy making prints with medium format camera and am interested in the palladium process I would like to know how i could use my 2 and a quarter negs to make such prints? i have heard of enlarging your negs in other ways,but I do not know what they are please help

-- (lyeguy@yahoo.com), April 27, 1999

Answers

Visit www.davidmichaelkennedy.com He has an extensive archive of data pertaining to PT/PD printing in.

-- Harold Todman (htodman@yahoo.com), April 28, 1999.

As far as I know Gary Auerbach - search website under that name - palladium/platinum workers recommend contact printing.

-- Lot (lotw@wxs.nl), April 28, 1999.

Calumet sells "Kodak Professional B/W Duplicating Film " Quoting: " Orthochromatic, medium contrast, direct positive film for one-step duplication of black & white continuous tone black & white negatives. Contrast can be manipulated to save problem negatives."

You need to be *serious*, though: 25 sheets of 8x10 is $133.00!!

I did use this once upon a time to make large negatives for gum-bichromate printing. Its speed, etc., is similar to paper.

Good luck!

-- Stephen Alred (salred@toad.net), May 13, 1999.


Purists will scream, but think digital. You can scan any print ---which of course may be a heavily manipulated image---and produce a negative transparency of any size you wish. This is your contact neg for P&P printing.

-- Standish Lawder (sdl@sni.net), November 20, 1999.

Almost all p/p printing is done by contact printing. This means making an 8x10 negative either, as suggested, on direct reversal film, or by use of an internegaive. In theory, it is possible to use an enlarger modified for the use of UV light sources. Unless you are a "techie" with access to good test equipment, it really isn't worth it. You need a UV source such as a sodium lamp, which provides enough UV, which requires modification to most enlarger housings, but then you lose lots of it in most enalrger lenses. Not to mention the heat problem, or the danger if you are exposed to too much UV, etc., etc. If I ever get the money to get the gear, and have the time I might try it - including testing lenses to see which have the least loss. But it's way down on the priority list. In general, I suggest doing the enlarging at the negative creation stage and contact print.

-- Richard Newman (rnewman@snip.net), November 20, 1999.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ