.

-- Sysman (y2kboard@yahoo.com), April 21, 1999

Answers

Sysman, why are you apologizing to the CJS entity? It is using rude and abusive behaviour in an attempt to silence others!!!

-- disgusted (enough@immature.techniques), April 21, 1999.

My intent is not to silence anyone. I feel that people should be more responsible for their statements, rather than relying on assumption and innuendo when no evidence exists.

Is that really such a problem?

-- CJS (CJS@CJS.com), April 21, 1999.

disgusted,

I accused CJS of making statements that he did not make. I had him confused with RMS. I don't have a problem admitting that I'm wrong. This does not mean that I agree with all that CJS has to say. <:)=

-- Sysman (y2kboard@yahoo.com), April 21, 1999.

Sysman,

It's good to see you have the character to admit to a mistake. To bad we can't say the same for CJS at this point.

-- (cujo@baddog.com), April 21, 1999.

It has no problem with trivializing a Canadian icon in a supposed attempt to make its supposed point. Shame on it!

-- disgusted (enough@immature.techniques), April 21, 1999.

"the best way to keep a dog from humping your leg is a swift kick in the balls"

-- Animal Control (animalcontrol@cujowasputdown.com), April 21, 1999.