The NON-JEWS Behind Kosovo : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

The NON-JEWS Behind Kosovo

By Barry Chamish


The American team behind the Yugoslav War have Jewish names and look very Jewish. This is a sad and humiliating fact...and it shouldn't take the anti-semites long to make a few associations and call the bloodletting in the Balkans a Jewish plot. However, if a plot exists, it is being managed by the very antithesis of Judaism, those who have abandoned Judaism for good.

Let us look at the core of the visible team:

William Cohen- Secretary Of Defense- Longtime member of the Council On Foreign Relations. Headed the notorious 1997 CFR Task Force On The Middle East, which called for Israel's withdrawal to 1948 lines and the division of Jerusalem, until replaced later by Henry Seigman. Though he has a Jewish father, Cohen was raised as Protestant and maintains no Jewish religious ties whatsoever.

Mad Madeleine Albright- Secretary Of State- Longtime member of the CFR. Her story is absolutely surreal. Born and raised Jewish in Czechoslovakia, she escaped the Holocaust and was cared for by Jewish relatives in London. Yet, over the years she forgot her entire childhood and adolescence, claiming she's always been a Christian. Her memory was jarred only when the Washington Post printed her true biography during the very week she was appointed Secretary of State. The woman did not simply disavow her Jewish roots, for fifty years she pretended they didn't exist. And for much of her term in office, she has been obsessed with pressing Israel to withdraw to suicidal borders.

James Rubin- State Department Spokesman- Member of the CFR. Recently married CNN Kosovo reporter Christiane Amanpour in a church. Claims to have adopted Christianity. While longtime CFR member Ted Turner's CNN grinds out the New World Order vision through Amanpour, Rubin coordinates the illusion as Alberight's supercilious mouthpiece.

This trio is hiding behind the bloodshed they are fomenting with a curtain woven of humanitarian goodness for the Kosovo refugees. Never mind that the refugees would not have been there to cover their deeds without the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. So far the facade is holding up but the curtain will eventually fall and when it does, thanks to this triumvirate of evil, Jews are going to be left holding the bag. When that day comes, let all so inclined to see the Jewish hand in NWO machinations recall that this war is in the hands of people who found the deep morality of Judaism not to their liking. They abandoned Judaism, and while Yugoslavia is their current target for destruction, Israel is next on their list.


The author's new book Israel Betrayed can be acquired by writing His other books can be ordered over Please visit

-- Andy (, April 19, 1999



We can see capital Y's. We can see k's here. But not a single "2". Not one zephyr of a breath of a thought of a pretense of a Y2k connection. It's off-topic.


Off-topic. OT. Off-topic.

There's at least one other Greenspun forum where this would fit right in. Why dinna ya try it, laddie?

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

... and no, the 2 in your e-address does not count.

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

Isn't it past your bedtime No Spam? - we've been through this a dozen times my son.

-- Andy (, April 19, 1999.

You show no signs of having learned.

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

Ya know No Spam,

You call this off topic, your current mantra-du-jour it seems.

I've been reading every post lately, and what do I find, you always pop up like my friend Prairie Dog, maybe I should refer to you in future as MEERKAT, however my point is that there are many many posts that I would consider off topic.

Now do I harass those posters? - no.

Do YOU harass those posters? - no.

Yet they are off topic according to YOUR rules Meerkat.

That makes you a class one hypocrite.

And by the way, the amount of bandwidth you took up over the last two days about the UN Court Martial was eminently OFF TOPIC my old son, it was also enough to power a Cray Supercomputer for a day or two.

Your problem is that you're not taking any meds.

I would start drinking some beer (Guinness) if I were you and mellow out.


-- Andy (, April 19, 1999.

Andy, I guess I'm putting myself at a handicap here by composing each response fresh instead of just copying. But it's less boring, so on balance ...

Generally, I don't bother the folks who just do it once or twice. When you're putting up so many targets, why spread my fire to the others? Take yourself out of the #1 position.

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

So you ADMIT you are harrassing me. Nothing better to do eh?

NATZI arsehole.

-- Andy (, April 19, 1999.


>So you ADMIT you are harrassing me.

No, I don't. Reread what I wrote: "I don't bother the folks who just do it once or twice."

Those folks aren't bothered by me. I don't bother them. They don't find me bothersome. You do, but you start off-topic threads LOTs more often than once or twice, so you aren't in the category described in the predicate of the quoted sentence.

Switching to your classiest set of sign-offs, eh?

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

My answer in response to another thread's question on the relevance of this post:-

"Thank you Sue, A little more civil than my erstwhile friend Meerkat. Yep it's a pain in the ass what is going on - talk of the draft, reserves being called up, talk on this forum for a long time about mock invasions in Monterrey and Texas, talk of a 200,000 strong invasion task force, talk of nukes on the forum.

So what does all this have to do with y2k - superficially not a lot, other than the possibility of other disputes breaking out elsewhere in the world other than Yugoslavia, thereby stretching the depleted military to perhaps a position of impotence, and what of y2k itself if it hits hard with the majority of those who would have been deployed in the USA off on foreign soil. You believe this has nothing to do with y2k? So what has been talked about on the forum by many people over all these months is off topic and not relevant? Dig a little deeper and you'll find that the y2k card is VERY relevant in this context. The threads are out there if you are interested.

I disagree with you and Meerkat on this point. So can you. Just walk on digitally by. Ignore this topic if you believe it's not relevant. Many believe it IS relevant as I'm getting a lot of private correspondence attesting to this.

Are we going to have censorship on this forum?

Is that what it's coming to?

Where do we draw the line?

Look at recent posts - Joke lists circulating (two or three) - Circuses (two Yourdon ones) - Rats - One Act Plays... Plenty more where these came from...

You get my drift.

Are these y2k related? - I say yes! Why the hell not? The forum is constantly eveolving.

What happens if a suitcase nuke goes off in Des Moines - will this be talked about on the forum? you betcha. Will it be y2k relevant - again - you betcha. Why? Apart from the obvious, to see how the agencies cope, FEMA, the military, water, power - the whole gamut.

y2k encompasses ALL facets of modern life - you and Meerkat would wish to compartmentalise it to fit your preconceived notions.

That's a little arrogant don't you think?

Let's just agree to differ Sue."

-- Andy (, April 19, 1999.

As for the Censorship straw-man argument you keep raising: Will you acknowledge that you've been informed on multiple occasions that there is at least one other Greenspun forum where your topics would be on-topic? Moving them there would satisfy me. I don't suggest that your postings be suppressed -- I just want them posted where they belong.

-- No Spam Please (, April 19, 1999.

Now Andy - don't pick on the poor innocent Jews. They have it rough. They keep getting kicked out of country after country. The world just doesn't understand them. Yeah, that's it!

You should be happy that so much of Clinton's cabinet has Jewish roots. Since Jews are only about 2-3% of the USA population, this shows the great success of our affirmative action policies.

And just because there is a huge political rift in Israel between Orthodox Jews (religious) and the secular Jews (the bulk of USA Jews), doesn't mean we have to have that in the USA.

-- NoFriendOfBill (, April 19, 1999.

Nofrienofbill - this piece was written, as you can see, by a rather unhappy guy. Another piece of the puzzle - a viewpoint you won't read about in the mainstream media.

-- Andy (, April 19, 1999.


Once again, thanks for the background information. A lot of this was unknown to me, although I admit I haven't been researching it. With regard to NoSpam, I think that when you post something this important that you should ignore his remarks, period. Sometimes it's like the FOX jumping the prairie dog (or Meerkat) and the FOX just can't pass up the thrill of the chase! But when you post important items, just ignore him, and if you feel the itch for the hunt, post something that is purely off topic and designed to sucker in ole NoSpam or Y2KPro. Make it a post that is purely for the fun of all, yourself included. :-) PS, I have a feeling you and me both are going to get a chance to test our patience on this, right now.

-- Gordon (, April 19, 1999.

Anyone who's read this far (or only skimmed, I hope) might appreciate what P. Greenspun has contributed at the bottom (of my screen at least):

"No one can write decently who is distrustful of the reader's intelligence, or whose attitude is patronizing. ... It is now necessary to warn the writer that his concern for the reader must be pure: he must sympathize with the reader's plight (most readers are in trouble about half the time) but never seek to know his wants. The whole duty of a writer is to please and satisfy himself, and the true writer always plays to an audience of one. Let him start sniffing the air, or glancing at the Trend Machine, and he is as good as dead, although he may make a nice living."

-- last chapter of The Elements of Style, Strunk and White "Everyone needs an editor." -- Tim Foote, commenting on the fact that Hitler's original title for Mein Kampf was Four-and-a-Half Years of Struggle against Lies, Stupidity and Cowardice

Good luck, all writers/posters out there.....

-- jor-el (, April 19, 1999.

The only person who really matters in Slick Willy himself. These three stooges are only his henchmen (henchpersons). Although they deserve to go to hell with him, he leads the way.

-- Incredulous (, April 19, 1999.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ