Check it out on Drudge. Without commenting on Bill --- apparently now we don't HAVE to testify, no matter what a judge or Grand Jury wants. What a great country -- at least for some.

-- Jon Johnson (narnia4@usa.net), April 12, 1999

Answers

If you'd been following the case and/or had half a brain, you'd realize how stupid your post is.

First of all, she spent a few years in the clink because of her refusal to testify.

Secondly, it is obvious from what we now know that Starr was railroading his witnesses.

And last but not least, yes it is a great country...and will be, until the likes of you and the rest of your conservative ilk find a way to reinstitute witchhunting.

-- y2k con (a@b.c), April 12, 1999.

Uninformation and disinformation

-- KoFE (Your@town.USA), April 12, 1999.

The vote of the jury confirmed that the psychopathic Starr has left a trail of ruined lives behind him in his quest for power. I think that the women was intelligent and absolutely entitled to protect herself from his attacks. She should not have even had to go to jail, but I guess it is still better than letting her life be destroyed by that tyrant.

-- @ (@@@.@), April 12, 1999.

I am not a fan of Clinton, and I've said so often. He did not keep his word about the environment, and has proved to be as bad as the Republicans at jumping in bed with corporation fat cats. But it seems to me that those accusing him of murder, rape, and general crookedness aren't a damn bit better.

Starr is a first class hypocrite, and has used his formidable power as independent prosecutor to persecute anyone even remotely connected with the Clinton administration. He would fit right in with the sanctimonious clergy in the Salem witch hunts, and would have been right at home in Spain during the inquisitions.

I'm glad to find I'm not the only tolerant person on this forum. But I'm a Libertarian, so to hell with Republicrats, or Demopubs. Scratch one and their all the same under the skin.

-- gilda jessie (jess@listbot.com), April 12, 1999.

Sorry should have been "they're" all the same.

-- gilda jessie (jess@listbot.com), April 12, 1999.

What the coon dog h*ll are you people yammering on about?

What "Honey"? Not guilty of what?

S.O.B.

-- sweetolebob (buffgun@hotmail.com), April 12, 1999.