A Preview of Infomagic's next WRP commentary

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

Tantalizing. From c.s.y2k:

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:00:42 -0800, Linda  wrote:

>Can you expand a bit on those "mind experiments". [I'm assuming these >were not chemical experiments, but I would be interested in how you've >come to your new conclusions]. Or is it just the factors mentioned in >the rest of this post?

I'll expand on this in the next article in my Set Recovery On series. I've been waiting for the DOW to top 10,000 because the lack of an early stock market crash is one of the main reasons I am more pessimistic -- the higher it goes, the farther it will crash, and the closer it happens to Y2K the worse _both_ will be.

I have a few changes to make, and I'll be travelling, but I should have that article done some time next week.

===================================== y 2 0 0 0 @ i n f o m a g i c . c o m =====================================

For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.

(2Th 2:11-12)

-- a (a@a.a), March 31, 1999


Who/What is Infomagic and how does one access their site??

-- anita (hillsidefarm@drbs.com), April 01, 1999.

Infomagic is a mainframe programmer with 30+ years experience with complex interconnected systems. His theory is, basically, that Y2K will be a 15 on a scale of 10. You can read his analysis and judge for yourself. They start in Hamasaki's WRP #100 at


-- a (a@a.a), April 01, 1999.

thanx. He makes GN look like an optimist! So- howcome Y2K Pro just picks on Ed and GN? why doesn't he take on Infomagic? Or does he?

-- anita (hillsidefarm@drbs.com), April 02, 1999.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ