I was somewhat frustrated with the book, because it did not go into any depth. I took a long-distance course (video) from Seattle Pacific University this past summer. This course was on Choice Theory and was presented by Dr. William Glasser and an associate Douglas H. Naylor. I enjoyed this course and learned a lot about choice theory. I do not know if the big vision of a school running completely as a "Quality School" would actually work (especially with the extreme behaviors), but I think 90% of it could, especially if it worked up from the elementary level. I think that the book did a good job discussing the differences between lead-management and boss management, but missed getting more in depth on the 4 basic needs: belonging, power, freedom and fun. The book also did not even mention how it (quality schools) has a big push on "G-PAR" (goal, plan, action, results.) If anyone is interested in getting more info, I was able to keep the books and videos, just let me know and I will loan them to you.

-- Anonymous, December 15, 1998

Answers

Richard,

I also have a hard time envisioning this program working throughout the whole school. It seems like Glasser's ideas are so individualized that to expect all teachers to progress in this delivery style at the same pace oir depth seems impossible. I do not, however, want to give the impression that I disagree with Glasser's intentions. His ideas are great and important but I don't see how a whole district could utilize his theory except on an individual basis. If I use his thoughts to improve myself, then perhaps it will rub off on students and collegues.

-- Anonymous, December 16, 1998

I also enjoyed the message but had a difficult time envisioning the practical application in my actual school. It is almost impossible to get most of the staff to even sit down and discuss an issue, especially now that MN State Standards takes up all the meeting time. I am very interested in borrowing your "Choice Theory" materials. Please let me know.

-- Anonymous, December 30, 1998

Rick,

I think on our good days many of us have been good lead-management style teachers. My problem with this philosophy is that it seems more likely to work with grade school kids than secondary. It seems that there are so many kids out there who will not be reached. I have a boy in my 7th hour study hall this year who is waiting to be dropped from his fourth class so that he can quit school. If he is dropped, he will maintain that it wasn't his fault. In fact, he is choosing to do so. What would Glasser say about choice theory in that regard.

When my son Greg chooses to put of doing his math assignments until it is too late, I see nothing wrong with him having to live with the consequences of that choice. Perhaps all we can do is strive to get quality work from as many students as we can. What should we do with those that will not play the game? Most of the time Ds and Fs are warranted.

Don't you think there are a lot of similarities between Glasser's Quality School and outcome based education?

-- Anonymous, January 05, 1999

I agree that Glasser defines both lead and boss management very well. However, I do feel that any theory could be sold as a great, innovative ideal. The practical management of a theory it is quite another question. One example of a theory I have heard is using the Internet as a creative journey for our students with no restrictions so they can gain life experiences. Hey, that sounds great in theory - - but the reality of it would be what?

I feel the same way with Glasser -- he has some great ideas but to implement all of his theories as a whole? Schools without coercion, although ideal, sounds unattainable.

-- Anonymous, January 11, 1999