Lee is correct-hold back on your evidence-what may seem a clear cut case can be changed in court-Like assigned policies get full proof first and do not disclose it yet Alleged cashing of your Cheque sounds ok but again be sure of your facts There are things in court like Slip Rules(errors made by the court but rectified)although in this case we are not saying its the courts fault Cases on Repossession have gone to court, were on appeal to the Circuit Judge. Judge has agreed there are false figures,but due in this case it was Duff Solicitor-in act TWO they must be sued and the lenders case was upheld against the Borrower without leave to Appeal! So figures were known to be false-the solicitors involved, both caused this and also one made complete mess of the hearing ,but still the lender got the Benefit they also knew the figures were false! With this type of practice going on like Lee stated hold back on your evidence.(posted 8700 days ago)Charles Twford