Ceee-peee-RRR-rrrrrrrrrr, you've got some splainin' to do!...

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Poole's Roost II : One Thread

I have just completely read the following amazing thread, and the links contained within:

Gawd! It only gets funnier: CPR's latest lame explanation as to how he lost $400K due to his Y2K concerns...
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=003mY2

OK. I know that I have said it at least twice before: Everytime that I think that this place can't get any wackier, it does. But, honestly, truly, I had actually convinced myself that there was nothing further that was going to get said that I had not seen before.

I mean, it had all gotten to be so routine. The memes, the profanity, the delusion, the memes, the New World Order, the satire of Paula Gordon, the memes, gold conspiracies, writeln loops, the ridicule of Gary North, Sister Catherine, Loon, the memes, etc., etc., etc. But this is unbelievable. This goes beyond anything that I could have imagined, even about cpr.

In order to fulfill his destiny to fight the Y2K computer bug "merchants of doom", cpr dropped out. He gave up an income of $100,000 a year to do this. He completely wasted his time "de-bunking" an issue that very, very few people cared about (i.e., those that foolishly didn't simply trust that the problem was in good, capable hands to solve). Yet he laughs at those "doomers" who spent a fraction of what he gave up, taking out their Y2K bug "insurance" (Flint's analogy).

OK, cpr. It is August 27, 2001 A.D. You have had a full year and nearly eight months to feel the sting of your stupidity. Any words of wisdom to share with the group? (My hankie is ready....)

-- Anonymous, August 27, 2001

Answers

gawd this troll is stupid and this proves beyond doubt that it is one of the former sheeted doomers who has "sanity issues".

Charlie NEVER said he gave up that much income, only that he gave up the potential income. Hint for the lame-of-brain: the dood proly makes so much money he didn't need the extra $$$. THAT should tell you sumthin bout his income. ANOTHER HINT: he proly pays more in tax than U & I gross together.

LOL at this "new" old troll!

-- Anonymous, August 27, 2001


TK is really T. K. GUMP. He and Forest were separated at birth.

FOREST GOT THE BRAINS IN THE FAMILY.

-- Anonymous, August 27, 2001


gawd this troll is stupid and this proves beyond doubt that...

Ahhh, the air tight logic of the "de-bunkers". It just never ceases to amaze me...


...it is one of the former sheeted doomers who has "sanity issues".

Poor, pitiful "de-bunker". You just don't know what else to do but call me a "doomer", even though I couldn't have cared less about the Y2K bug -- just trusted that the problem was being well taken care of by the experts who knew what they were doing. As opposed, for example, to "experts" like cpr.


Charlie NEVER said he gave up that much income, only that he gave up the potential income.

Oh, sure, sure. So, if I were to quit my job today, of my own free will and volition, I am not really giving up my income -- "only" my potential income. Sort of like the Clintonian approach to the word "is" -- yes, that makes so much sense. Not.


Hint for the lame-of-brain: the dood proly makes so much money he didn't need the extra $$$. THAT should tell you sumthin bout his income.

It sure tells me something about your spelling. Atrocious! And, hey, sure, what's $100K per year? Mere chump change!


ANOTHER HINT: he proly pays more in tax than U & I gross together.

Right. After all, he may have given up his potential income, but never gave up his potential to pay income taxes. Funny, though, I always thought that the amount of income taxes you paid was directly proportional to how much income you received. Silly, silly me. Learn something new every day, I guess; like them "writeln loops"...


LOL at this "new" old troll!

Yep, what goes around comes around, "Dood".

-- Anonymous, August 29, 2001

Forest TK, I'm not an employee like you. I'm an owner. End of story.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001

Well I must apologize. I did not realize that Tiny Knutsack didn't have a brain, not even a lame one. I'll 'splain S-L-O-W-L-Y this time....

If a person can live on 30K a year but makes 60K doing normal work, said person would have no need to work overtime to earn 75K a year. The difference between 60K and 75K is 15K (because Tiny Knutsack has no brain, I am calculating for it) and would be considered potential income. [If Tiny Knutsack still doesn't understand this concept, it is more than likely due to its dependence on its monthly government check (handout if you prefer)].

There is a simple reason I refer to you as "it", Tiny Knutsack. You are interchangeable with any number of doomers who's words could be cut and pasted to each other, regardless of handle. You cannot think for yourself, just like your fellow doomers. For some reason this has bothered you greatly....so badly in fact, that you now must try and convince yourself that you are superior to the de-bunker crowd. You make me LOL..."dood". Forum shuts down for a day and your first response is to this thread.....heh.

I must also now apologize to the gang of Poole's Roost for further engaging this Tiny Knutsack person...I confess to a certain morbid interest in "Voles" and how they think.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001



RAOF@LM.AOAY:

Or, to put it another way, cpr gave up $100,000 a year for at least two if not three years for a "cause" that was completely and utterly worthless -- it was based on the wrong, wrong, wrong assumption that an issue that hardly anyone cared about needed his "expertise". This was, is, and always will be the so-called "Reuben Delusion" that Ken Decker has waxed so eloquently.

To summarize: cpr has done a very stupid thing, at least as stupid as the most deluded "doomer" could ever have done!

Thank you for the clarification.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001

None of you will ever know the depths of Ken's wisdow and eloquence.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001

I'm constantly amazed at the "anal" references by some. If one isn't full of shit, or asked to eat shit and die, one is accused of having gas that removes hair. Most folks got over the "anal" stage at a VERY early age, but every time I come here I hear the equivalent of "You poopy head. You poopy breath." This is a stage some children go through when they're 2 or 3 years old, and SOME children extend this phase to maybe 3rd grade. It's NOT commonly found in adults who have satisfying lives.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001

YOU are certainly one to talk about a satisfying life, Ms. (unemployed for years - without health insurance - no future anywhere) Spooner.

The guy really does have bad gas and I was just warning Celia. You're lucky I didn't go into his wild mating habits. I spared all of you a vision no one should have to live with.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001


I'm doing quite well, thank you. I've actually gone MANY years without health insurance and never suffered. It's something a lot of self-employed folks do.

I don't know that my career potential is as bleak as you make it sound. I'm not real crazy about resuming the career I once had, but I have time to make choices, and enough money to support me through that decision period.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001



I believe your future IS as bleak as I made it out to be. I remember when you applied for a job in education at least a YEAR ago and you STILL aren't employed.

I also remember you had a broken bone recently and couldn't afford to get it fixed. Your thought processes are polluted, Anita - almost as much as the air that comes out of Ken Deckers butt.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001


You're reading between the lines here. It wasn't as though I couldn't "afford" to get that bone fixed. It was because I KNEW which bone was broken and knew what to do about it that led to the bone healing on its own. Had I thought myself to be in any danger of a "deranged foot", I, certainly, would have sought out the expertise of a doctor.

You're somewhat correct in the school job, however. Every time I turned around, UTA added more courses to the curriculum on that one. For a job that ultimately only brings in $34,000 [max] a year, I decided that I'd be best served by waiting [or even pursuing another career path.] I also dealt with my mom moving to a new facility, and she hasn't even settled in there yet to our mutual comfort level. Sometimes, it's more important to deal with family issues [especially if the income is no big deal at the present] and pursue new career goals once that is complete.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001


For a job that ultimately only brings in $34,000 [max] a year, I decided that I'd be best served by waiting [or even pursuing another career path.] I also dealt with my mom moving to a new facility, and she hasn't even settled in there yet to our mutual comfort level. Sometimes, it's more important to deal with family issues [especially if the income is no big deal at the present] and pursue new career goals once that is complete.

Anita, it sounds like you are making the right decisions about the right trade-offs. Yes, you are taking a hit in terms of future (or, as some might say, "potential") income, but for all the right reasons.

Unlike those poor, deluded people who give up their future/"potential" incomes for ... nothing. As hard as it is to believe, some fools do just that.

-- Anonymous, August 30, 2001

Moderation questions? read the FAQ