-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), March 25, 2000.
Have you ever pictured in your mind what forum members look like?greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread |
As Ive read your posts Ive developed a mental image of what some of you look like. Im probably Way off for a lot of people, but its fun to think about it, and put it into words. Below Im going to list some names and descriptions of what I think you look like. Please dont be offended if Im WAY off, because the truth is, I dont even know if some of you are male or female. Some of you may have posted your descriptions in the past, but Ive never read a description of anyone. My vision of you is based purely on what Ive read, and what type of person I think writes like you do. (However, some of my descriptions are just for fun, and I hope those of you who I jest with will take it lightheartedly.
If Im dead-on, let me know!
Cpr - Boy, youre a tough one. I figure youre in your late 50s, 7 feet tall, (Youll always be one of my heroes) gray hair with black twinges left around the. bottom on the back and sides. I think your hair is short and maybe receding a little on the top. I cant imagine you with a beard or mustache, but I think you probably wear a 2.75 pair of glasses. To sum it up, I think you look a little like Sean Connery. (Ill also bet your nickname is cubbard.)
Flint- You were easy. I think you look like a thin, 40 year-old Martin Luther King.
OTFR - I think youre probably in your 60s, with gray hair (maybe a pony tail) and you have a mustache.. I think youre married with several grown children and MANY grandchildren. I figure you have deep wrinkles in your forehead from worrying too much. # :- ( and to sum you up, I think you look like Michael Landon did, with long hair.
Mr Polly - Of course, I know for a fact he looks like a young Mel Gibson only MUCH taller :o)
gilda - You were easy too. I picture you in your mid-60s, I think your hair is thick. just past your ears, and worn in a layered pageboy. You dress conservative classy, but are comfortable in an apron too. I think you look a lot like Barbara Walters.
Cin - Easy! You have shoulder-length blonde hair. In your early 30s? Big kangaroo eyes, and a little nose. I think you look just like Meg Ryan when she did Sleeping in Seattle only with blonde hair.
Consumer - Another easy one. I think youre in your middle 30s, brown shoulder-length hair, and long, brown, llama-like eyelashes. I figure youre tall and thin, but not skinny. I think you look a lot like Minnie Driver.
Z - Youre another tough one. I picture you as having straight, thick, ear-length light brown hair. I think youre probably tall, may be 511? I think you also dress conservative casual, but with younger tastes than gilda. I think you look a lot like Martha Stewart?
(Please dont hit me with a bag of hot nickels if Im WAY off here, ok, people? Im having fun guessing. )
Chris - I figure you have brown hair just to your shoulders. I think youre one of the creeps that dont have to curl it or nothin. You probably just wash it and go, and I hate your guts. I think youre in your late 30s, 55, and 130 lbs. If I had to pick just one person who would describe you best, I think it would be Jody Foster.
Lars - Another easy one! 50s, grayish-brown hair, 511 and 180 lbs. I think you look a lot like John Travolta does now, only you dont weigh as much.
David Bumpkin - Youre a hard one, but let me guess. Youre in the early 40s, 6, and 200 lbs., and you look a little like Ben Affleck.
rich - I picture you with black hair that you grease down but push your front bangs up. I think youre probably 54, 122 lbs., and you keep your pants pulled high on your chest with suspenders. I suspect your pants are usually high-watered, and you wear white socks and saddle shoes. Ill bet you wear glasses and youve taped the sides on when then pins fell out. To put it quite bluntly, sir; I think you look like Pee wee Herman :o) (Youve asked for that you know.)
Desert Dog - Youve gotta be a dead-ringer for Robin Williams.
Sysman - Dead-ringer for George Carlin.
Hawk - Dead-ringer for Tommy Lee Jones.
Decker - Dead-ringer for Will Smith.
Among those coming up tomorrow, or the next:
Deb Spence
Anita
hmm
FM
Paul Davis
Rational 1
and, W
Of course this wouldnt be any fun if I dont include: Diane Squire, Ed Yourdon when he isnt professionally posed, Chuck the Night Driver, Old Git, Greg Canton, and DD 1st Light!
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 25, 2000
gee...i feel left out...
-- Uncle Bob (unclb0b@aol.com), March 25, 2000.
wow Meg Ryan, thanks, she's adorable! =o) {giggle}
-- cin (cinlooo@aol.com), March 25, 2000.
Spare yourself the agony of wondering about my looks:
-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), March 25, 2000.
Hey, uncle Bob....
I didn't have time to write everyone's name down tonight!
You can bet you, and Unc D, will be in the next round.
:o)
~*~
-- Laura (Ladylogic@....), March 25, 2000.
Laura, not bad. Are you a part-time psychic? (please folks, I did NOT say "psycho"). My hair is brown-gray. It is also thin. I am 6', 170#. I am 62, but most people peg me 5 years younger (well of course I would say that). John Travolta? Naaah, altho I did do some disco in my daze.
-- Lars (lars@indy.net), March 25, 2000.
Laura, I'm pouting....just kidding! I'll tell you who Uncle Bob looks like - Harrison Ford. He's my favorite, Uncle B that is!
-- LZach (lisa@texasnetworks.com), March 25, 2000.
Well, my goodness, Lars. I never would have guessed you at 62.
You certainly don't look it!
;o)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 25, 2000.
Lisa! Hi! How are you doing tonight??
I figure you look a lot like Courtney Cox with long hair. Am I close?
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 25, 2000.
LOL! Don't I wish!!!(by the way, I'm doing great and glad to see that you are too!)
-- LZach (lisa@texasnetworks.com), March 25, 2000.
Hey Lisa, do you have bulletin board software that uses extreme tracker?
Maybe we can make a few bucks if you do??
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 25, 2000.
"Chris - I figure you have brown hair just to your shoulders. I think youre one of the creeps that dont have to curl it or nothin. You probably just wash it and go, and I hate your guts. I think youre in your late 30s, 55, and 130 lbs. If I had to pick just one person who would describe you best, I think it would be Jody Foster."Eery.
You did ask that we tell you if you're dead on, right? Well, you're almost dead on. 5+ lbs too much, and although Jody Foster is one of my movie idols, I think of her as a blonde with long hair. Wish I had her dead serious no-nonsense looks though. I try hard to be no-nosense, but my frivolous side peaks out at the most inapropriate times.
-- Chris (!@#$@pond.com), March 25, 2000.
LOL Laura! I am here to testify that my mental image of people, turned out to be a falsetto, once their physical form, faced me. The physical form versus the Spirtual, are sometimes, in conflict, in our minds. It is only in this skin, that we now dwell. May our minds reach beyond the skin. Speed.
-- Been around (ablock@ortwo.com), March 25, 2000.
Uncle D! You're totally cute in a Sid Vicious sort of way. Love the hair. (is that really you?)
-- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 25, 2000.
Laura, yes we do have forum software but it doesn't use anything called "extreme tracker". It uses a proprietary tracking system that our developers designed. What did you have in mind?
-- LZach (lisa@texasnetworks.com), March 26, 2000.
Gosh I too, feel ignored. Some of us must be insignificant.
-- Aunt Bee (SheriffAndy@Mayberry.com), March 26, 2000.
Among those coming up tomorrow, or the next:
Sorry, Aunt Bee. I'll get around to all of you sometime. (I guess that sentence didn't make that clear.)
Lisa, I'll either call you, or e-mail you on Tuesday. (I have to familiarize myself with a couple of software programs first.)
God bless you, and keep you well.
:o)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 26, 2000.
And her favorite Ex-troll?..... Course she knows what I look like :-)Too bad she won't return the favor......
-- Netghost (ng@no.yr), March 26, 2000.
According to her,Y2K Personal ads
Posted by Laura (l M Cissy@aol.com) on July 04, 1999 at 22:23:07:I live in Phoenix, so that may make it difficult to meet, but here goes anyway.
I don't want to divulge too much information on a public forum, but the basics are:
I'm single, no children.
Non-smoker, enjoy wine on ocassion
Bachelor's degree (Summa cum laude)
40's
5'4
120 lbs.
Fair-skinned blonde.
-- (Man Wanted@personals.ads), March 26, 2000.
No offense or an attack, LL, but on an earlier post you were intimating that part of what you are doing here is attempting to find the identities of people on the internet.That is why you told some of your "trolls" to "fuck off", because you knew that some of us would come to the surface.
Here, you are making physical assessments of others. My belief is that you are trying to elicit responses of people saying that you are wrong and then giving you the correct descriptions of themselves.
It appears to me that you are trying to use various tools in order to find out about people over the web. This is beginning to look like some type of college (undergrad or grad) experiment about how to learn about people over the web.
Via email, someone told me that LL "is not what she seems". I'm not sure what that me means, but I'm guessing that I may be seeing the picture.
Then again, maybe I'm wrong. I've been at school all day and out tonight, and I am heading to Cincinnati tomorrow for a 3 day conference. Speaking of that, I understand that there are a fair amount of Ohioans on this board. I am going to a restaurant tomorrow night called the Montgomery Inn. Supposedly has really good BBQ ribs. Anyone have any input?
-- CJS (cjs@noemail.com), March 26, 2000.
CJS,Yes, indeed, the Montgomery Inn has great ribs. They're not like Kansas City or Soutern style ribs but unique in their own way, kinda like Cincinnati chili. Make sure you also try the Grater's ice cream while you're there...yum :^)
-- Jim Cooke (JJCooke@yahoo.com), March 26, 2000.
Well, kinda. Since George, and I, for now at least, both have short hair, and a salt-pepper beard (although George is much more salty), I guess one could stretch it. But I've got a Heineken gut, and I wear glasses. Plus I look really young for my age. But if you look at George in the 70's, and me, only a few short months ago, with my 2 foot pony tail, well, maybe.But I'm much more blonde than George (no comments from the peanut gallery, please).
<:)=
-- Sysman (y2kboard@yahoo.com), March 26, 2000.
Jim:Yes, indeed, the Montgomery Inn has great ribs. They're not like Kansas City or Soutern style ribs but unique in their own way, kinda like Cincinnati chili. Make sure you also try the Grater's ice cream while you're there...yum :^)
I agree, although you left out Memphis. Yet, in my experience, if you really want to investigate ribs, you need to go to Texas. It seems that every town big enough to have a crossroads has at least one place to try. The results vary from bad, to outstanding, to wierd. If you want to find French, go to France. If you want to find barbacue go to rural Texas.
Disclaimer I don't live in Texas and this is not an advert.
Best wishes,
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 26, 2000.
CJS wins the brass ring.Yes, she's gathering info from those stupid enough to walk into the trap.
Anyone take her up on her offer to send cards to their children yet?
-- nope (nope@nope.nope), March 26, 2000.
1X4Y7, couldn't agree more. Clark's in Tioga,TX. None compare.
-- Carlos (riffraff@cybertime.net), March 26, 2000.
The beautiful, intelligent, highly educated Laura places "lonely hearts looking for love" ads on the internet? Interesting.
-- (abby@tat.home), March 26, 2000.
"Anyone take her up on her offer to send cards to their children yet? "No, but I think Hawk put in a request for his gerbils ; )
-- capnfun (capnfun1@excite.com), March 26, 2000.
Abby,If one is single and looking for an interesting companion, why not?
It's a lot more likely to produce meaningful results than jousting with members of this august forum (which often seems a lot like mental monkey-spanking --- but fun)!
-- Flash (flash@flash.hq), March 26, 2000.
IMHO...Real men would not make jokes about a woman's looks. And if they DID, then they must really really like her a lot. =o)
-- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 26, 2000.
Thank you, cavscout-
I dont think you could make me look any better than you have lately. Maybe I should hire you as my P.R. agent, because I think you could inadvertently make me a fortune..
I think everybody already knows that stuff about me; you havent introduced any new information there. What you have done is remind me of why I posted that. I suspect like other single people, Ive always thought I would be more attracted to someone who could write than someone with great looks. Guess what? I was right. Ive been far more attracted to men Ive meet online than off, because anonymity allows them to discuss their desires, their hopes, their dreams, and their philosophies, truthfully, long before we ever meet. Ive found that knowing someone intimately online first allows for a greater depth of love and caring than ones developed offline for years (if ever). (The internet seems to accelerate just about everthing, have you noticed?) Now, whether that translates into a lifetime of happiness with someone, I dont know......I may never know. All I do know is that I never found the kind of happiness Ive been looking for with a man Ive met r/t because Ive always had to guess at whats important to him. I think online romance forces people to write about whats important to them, rather than just killing time and space. (Furthermore, it keeps me from having to fight off groping hands:o)
(Should I post your ad next? No,........I dont want to bore everybody, cause God knows youre BORING.)
CJS -
Are you one of those conspiracy theorists? I thought it was funny that people thought I was a government shill before the rollover, but to see this kind of theory now is sad. Its sad especially coming from you because I assume youve read my posts at DeBunkers and Biffy, and you should know that at one time I thought the only people left at the old TimeBomb was losers. (My post as "Hamster" certainly proved me wrong, didnt it? The people who hung around and posted certainly do have an education.)
You are wrong, CJS. Im not conducting a class project. Before the rollover, do you remember people saying, "pull up a chair and watch history unfold? IMHO, nothing of historical importance happened, and history certainly isnt being made now. Were not important to anybody except each other, and wed make for a very pedestrian case study. This thread is just my way of having some fun with people.
"having some fun"
You should try it sometime. Come on! Loosen up, relax and undo your tie. I swear to you Im no more dangerous to anyone than a leaf twirling around in a mid-summer breeze.
~*~
-- Laura (Ladylogic@...), March 26, 2000.
LL, I too have often wondered what everyone looked like. Yourdon was the only person whose looks I knew, because his picture was on his book.You're very close! But you said "mid 60's!!!" I'm 60!! Don't make it any worse than it is!!! Have one grown child. My hair is fairly close to what you said, and I do dress the way you describe when going out, but at home, especially when gardening, I look more like a hillbilly bag lady. And I loved discoe.
Heyyyy, you're not one of the psychic's I see advertising on cable are you?????
And I don't like men making disparaging remarks about women's looks either. I think Laura spammed the Yourdon't forum because she was angry, and I don't blame her. Sometimes when a person is treated shitty, they act shitty. I very much like Laura, Anita, cin, Aunt Bee and other women on this forum, and some I've probably missed. But that doesn't mean we agree on everythings, which would be borrrring if we did.
-- gilda (jess@listbot.com), March 26, 2000.
There's just something about tits. Never met a pair I didn't like. Confident you forum ladies wouldn't change my mind.
-- Carlos (riffraff@cybertime.net), March 26, 2000.
Carlos:I used to have this nanny goat that would probably change your mind ;>).
LL:
Z - Youre another tough one. I picture you as having straight, thick, ear-length light brown hair. I think youre probably tall, may be 511? I think you also dress conservative casual, but with younger tastes than gilda. I think you look a lot like Martha Stewart?
Quite wrong. Couldn't have played linebacker at 5'll''. Not even back then. Gilda says that she dresses like a bag lady at home. From your argument you think that Martha Stewart is a bag lady with younger tastes ;<) and {g}.
Best wishes,,
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 26, 2000.
LL:Please note that the software cut off my emoticons. They were ;>) and (g). The rest of this is to keep it from cutting it off again.
Best wishes,,,,
Z
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 26, 2000.
gilda,
I absolutely agree with you. Life would be extremely borrrring if we all thought alike. I've learned a LOT from people here that I've disagreed with, and sometimes I come to understand what they were thinking, and why, later. THAT's one of the reasons I love this forum. Most of the people here are "real" and speak their mind. I've learned more from discussions here, (even many I'm not active in) than people I've worked with.
Z,
Are you telling me you're a guy? If you are, my radar was WAY off, and I'm really sorry. Clearly I should have read some of your older posts before I posted that description of you. Oh well, as Mr. Peabody says, "Back to the drawing board!"
~*~
-- Laura (Ladylogic@...), March 26, 2000.
Laura, ET wants to know how you see me.
-- ET (bnevile@zebra.net), March 26, 2000.
LL:Guy Was the last time I looked. Have been as long as I can remember. Football, baseball & track. Gave that up when I realized that I lacked the talent to compete at the college level [regardless of the scholarships]. Took an academic one and the rest is history. If you must know, try approximately 6' 2 1/2" and 225 lbs. Same weight as college, but like Sysman, just arranged differently, now-a-days.
Best wishes,,,,
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 26, 2000.
Laura illogic,I've pictured you as a big fat blond with an ass four feet wide. Your unwashed greasy hair is plastered to your forehead. You have'nt bathed or shaven your legs or armpits in about 10 days. You sit in a rundown trailer on an overgrown lot with four barking dogs chained outside next to the beat up 1975 Ford Granada that your biker brother has been working on for you for 3 months now. But he's in jail now. You spend all your time bursting out of your polyster pants, sitting in front of the tube watching Springer and smoking Pall Malls. You move only to pee and get another donut. Your trailer is littered with old McDonalds bags and weeks worth of unwashed laundry. Nothing has been vacuumed, dusted or straightened for damn near a generation, which happens every 13 years in your family. Your pantry consists of cigarettes and beer. For excitement you call the psychic hotline every couple of hours. Your welfare case worker suggested a computer and now you torture this forum just for the fun of it.
Am I close?
-- Fat, lazy and stupid (trailerpark@in the sticks.com), March 27, 2000.
fat lazy & stupidYou shouldn't judge those you meet online by the standards of those you choose to associate with offline. Your in-depth knowledge of the type speaks volumes. As Hannibal Lector said . . "we covet what we see every day".
Having said that, I guess if ranting in here is an outlet for your anger at the slobbish nature of your neighbours, I guess it's preferable to taking a shotgun to 'em.
Regards
W
-- W0lv3r1n3 (W0lv3r1n3@yahoo.com), March 27, 2000.
W,For entertainment purposes only. All in good fun with no harm meant.
Besides I live two trailers downwind.
-- Fat, lazy and stupid (trailerpark@in the sticks.com), March 27, 2000.
Fat, Lazy & Stupid: WOW! It's uncanny how you described some homes in Every Town, USA! I have a friend whose a plumber and he describes homes that he has been in just like you have. Some are worse than others, and what's so pitiful, is a bottle of Clorox costs less than $1.00. I think Laura should post a picture of herself along with her diplomas so we can see what she looks like. She says she's very pretty, I wouldn't doubt that she is, but I'm no beauty queen expert.
-- no expert (noexperttt@noexperttt.xcom), March 27, 2000.
As usual, Laura doesn't seem to have a thought in her head except who is naughty, who is nice, who is cute, or who is not.In another thread, she proudly explained that she often tries to prod us (but most especially her antagonists) into blabbing as much as possible, so she could learn more about us. She seemed to think of this as research.
But the lesson I cannot avoid drawing from her behavior is that she is not interested in ideas, but only people. If she has any ideas to share, they are invariably tied to people and their personalities. Beyond that, all is darkness and a void.
Laura, just out of curiosity, do you think the increasing concentration of wealth in America among the top 1% of citizens over the past 20 years has been a good thing, a bad thing, or essentially neutral, in terms of our general quality of life and the strength of our institutions? Why?
C'mon. Spill the beans.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
Perhaps what Ladylogic is doing is chumming. Take a look at the thread at http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch- msg.tcl?msg_id=002qz6. It looks as if someone is trying to find out who on this forum is worried about nuclear war.
-- No name (no@ddress.noaddy), March 27, 2000.
Well, excuse me all to hell, Brian. I didn't ralize I was on the face of this earth to discuss the things you want to discuss, when you want to discuss them.
I happen to like some members on this board, and I was having fun with them. That's obviously a concept you and CJS have never heard of. Here, maybe if I spell it for you, it might sink in:
F
U
N
Until this moment, I haven't known you well enough to like you, dislike you, or have any kind of mental image of you.
Guess what I'm thinking of you now??
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
Robin Williams.... I'm flattered...NANU, NANU.
snoozin'...
The Dog
-- The Dog (dogdesert@hotmail.com), March 27, 2000.
No one here really cares LL whether you like them or not. Brian was essentially calling you out and what he says is true. You may think of this as being fun, but other's can't help but wonder what your motives are. I remember a thread back on OTB where the posters names were put with celeberties. If your doing research, maybe that's a good place to go for information.
-- suspicious mind (Suspiciousmindd@suspiciousmindd.xcom), March 27, 2000.
>> Well, excuse me all to hell, Brian. [...] <<A hit! A palpable hit!
'Tis not so wide as a church door, nor so deep as a well, But 'twill do. 'Twill do.
>> I happen to like some members on this board, and I was having fun with them. <<
If you could be any kind of animal, what animal would you be? Can you touch your elbows behind your back? Hey! What's that stuck on your front? Do you mudwrestle? Mommeeeeee, how long before we get there?
>> Guess what I'm thinking of you now?? <<
When dogs dream, what do they dream about?
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
Forum members, please ignore my conversations with Mark, my troll. On occasion, (like that post directly above me) he says things to me that only he and I know about, so you can't possibly follow the conversation.
mark/cavscout/suspiciousmind
I can't believe you still spend your time trolling me; but, keep it up because I like it. It just demonstrates how hard it is for you to get over me, and it's proof -- at least in my mind -- that I'm special enough to warrant your time and your energy.
However, I thought you said you have a bunch of girlfriends. Where are they today? Don't they think you're a little crazy for sitting at the computer harassing an ex-cyber girlfriend, rather than spend time with them?
Oh, silly me. They've probably already figured out you're stark-raving mad.
Ok, type away!
(However, your antics are deserving of a grade schooler.)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
Can you touch your elbows behind your back? Hey! What's that stuck on your front? Do you mudwrestle? Mommeeeeee, how long before we get there?
LOL!! Brian!
At least I have to give you credit for being cute.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
>> Forum members, please ignore my conversations with Mark, my troll. On occasion, (like that post directly above me) [...] <<Correction. Brian McLaughlin wrote the post appearing directly above the one where this quote appeared. I have that on the firmest authority, namely myself. If'n you don't believe me, email brianm@ims.com and the real non-Mark, non-troll Brian McLaughlin will confirm this.
However, since you make a hobby out of tracing other participants, you probably will fear I would do the same to you. I wouldn't. I don't really give a rip who you are, except as you appear here. Believe it or don't.
>> [...] he says things to me that only he and I know about, so you can't possibly follow the conversation. <<
Ah, poor Ophelia! Rue is for remembrance.
I can't help but think that most people reading my reply got my point. Sorry if you were sorely perplexed by it.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
>> At least I have to give you credit for being cute. <<Puppies are cute. They wriggle when you pet them. They also don't aim when they pee. I do.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
>> Forum members, please ignore my conversations with Mark, my troll. On occasion, (like that post directly above me) [...] <<Correction. Brian McLaughlin wrote the post appearing directly above the one where this quote appeared. I have that on the firmest authority, namely myself. If'n you don't believe me, email brianm@ims.com and the real non-Mark, non-troll Brian McLaughlin will confirm this.
Do you believe that there is a possiblity that she posted at the same time as you, and therefore did not realize that there would be a post between the one she was referring to (signed by Suspicious Mind) and her own?
-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), March 27, 2000.
Thanks, hmm,I was attempting to address cavscout; not Brian.
Brian,
Ok, go ahead and beat me black and blue with a wet noodle. I don't care anymore. I had people threaten to kill me, rape me, and beat me when I turned polly and spammed -- online and on the phone -- so your efforts to humiliate me aren't going to hurt me anymore than I've already been.
But guess what? Being hurt has taught me to be a lot nicer to most people, so I'm not going to respond to you the same way you have to me.
I hope you have a nice day, sir.....and I truly mean that.
~*~
-- Laura (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
What Brian is doing reflects on him. tsk tsk Brian, easy buttons to push huh? At least you're not hiding under a bridge.If you only read troll threads about Laura and her fun threads, you're missing the whole picture. But most of her intelligent posts were written before the roll-over though. She's been vindicated and now she's having fun. Can't blame her, I'm losing motivation to do anything else these days either.
-- Chris (!@#$@pond.com), March 27, 2000.
Laura:>> Ok, go ahead and beat me black and blue with a wet noodle. I don't care anymore. I had people threaten to kill me, rape me, and beat me when I turned polly and spammed -- online and on the phone [...]<<
I fail to see any connection between what I said and those threats to rape, kill, or assault you. Except that they happened to you. There is an equally strong connection between what you ate for breakfast today and what you ate for dinner last week.
>> [...] so your efforts to humiliate me aren't going to hurt me anymore than I've already been. <<
I expect that next you will place the back of your hand gently to your forehead and swoon backwards on to the couch. This gesture can be used in a lot of situations, so you should keep it handy.
>> But guess what? Being hurt has taught me to be a lot nicer to most people, so I'm not going to respond to you the same way you have to me. <<
Sometimes people are thoughtless and forget to notice how nice a person you are. This is wrong and must be stopped. I can see you know the best way to make them notice and are not afraid to apply it. Just come right out and tell us.
Who are we going to believe: you or our lyin' rotten eyes?
>> I hope you have a nice day, sir.....and I truly mean that. <<
I accept that you truly mean it ... for as long as it takes you to write it. But, will you still love me tomorrow? I sincerely doubt it.
If I were guessing about you in the way you are so fond of guessing about others, I would definitely peg you for having been raised somewhere in the South. Your reportoire of manipulations is typical of the Southern Belle.
You're too middlebrow for Dallas. Not deadly enough for Georgia. You from Memphis, honey lamb?
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
>> tsk tsk Brian, easy buttons to push huh? <<I have seen a great many sides of Laura. I have seen her in her petulant fits, in her guise of sweetness and light, and in her pretensions. Everyone is eventually revealed in their character, as they continue to post.
I am no different. You will inevitably draw conclusions about me from what I write, over time, in many threads. You may already have some insights into me that I do not possess myself. That is simply how it works out in a place like this forum.
My conclusions about Laura are founded on many, many dozens of exposures in many different threads, as are yours. In my view she is deeply and instinctively manipulative. There is an element of calculation behind her many postures. She is right that she is intelligent in that she has a good strong grip on what she wants and what she will do to get it. But she is, to put it bluntly, devious as hell.
Take this thread for instance. Every "portrait" of a forum regular is unabashedly grossly flattering. Flint and Martin Luthur King (jr.)? You and Jodie Foster? This is as thick as the jam on a crust. Does she think she'll be believed? She isn't that dumb. So what is going on? A game! let's all play!
Face it, Chris. Laura is jabbing away at every button on us she thinks she might be able to reach. What you don't know (nor do I) is why. For fun? Maybe. But I don't imagine that the fun Laura offers us is the same fun she finds in this game. That she hides very completely.
I realize this may sound very dark and conspiratorial. But there is a clear difference. I don't pretend to know why Laura acts as she does, what satisfaction she derives from her threads, or what she expects to accomplish, if anything. I just know that she strikes me as being as straightforward as a pretzel and as trustworthy as a carnival barker.
Maybe she's just afraid of opening up to the world and gives us this version of herself so we won't go looking for the rest of her. Who knows?
I am absolutely sure that I am not smart enough to ensnare Laura into showing her true thoughts. I can't force her to doff all many layers of misdirection and subterfuge that she places between herself and the rest of us. I can't make her stop doling out her little rewards and punishments. I can't stop her calculated histrionics.
She says she likes fun and games. So I'm playing with her. Just not by her script.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 27, 2000.
Brian, I'm sitting here in pure amazement. I'm wondering how you could possibly come up with such a bizarre assessment of me. You are completely wrong about me; but you're welcome to your opinion, of course. You probably know by now, that I respect anyone's opinion about anything or anyone, if they put their "true" handle. (I have NO respect for cavscout and Pat, for that reason.)
Why you, and CJS, think I have some sort of dark and conspiratorial motivation (that is what you're thinking; it's obvious from your posts) behind my posts is beyond me.
First of all, I was just having fun with my thoughts of what people look like. In MOST cases, I gave a description, and then linked the thought with a famous person because I figured everyone could make something of a mental leap with me if I did that. Most of the people I used as "counterparts" are pretty well-known, and I thought that association might help illustrate my thoughts.
Second of all, I didn't describe everyone as socially prescribed, "beautiful" people. I don't happen to think Tommy Lee Jones, Martha Stewart, Dr. Martin Luther King, Sean Connery, Will Smith, or George Carlin are particularly good-looking people. I assure you, if I was trying to "manipulate" people as you have so blatantly accused me of, I guarantee you, I would have picked more beautiful, and powerful people.
Now, I'm wondering why you think I picked some people and not others as "special targets"? What do you think I'm going to do with them? Look up their addresses, hop on a plane, fly all over the world, and show up at their doorstep? What for?
Maybe you think I'm going to sell them something? What? My daddy's oil well maybe? Get real. I have absolutely no reason for manipulating those people. (Except Lisa Z. maybe. I might want to buy something from her someday.)
Hi Lisa!
Brian, you sir, are being silly.
However, I hope you have a nice night, anyway.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@.....), March 27, 2000.
Laura,I think your cool as hell, bet you love a GOOD maragrita too....? Yes, (nope the f-ing dope) I did give her my sons b-day and his name. So what?
Close but no cigar.....
Consumer is.... 5'2 120 lbs, brunette w/red tint, buzzed at the moment, has 3 sons, and is blue eyed.
AND VERY PROUD....not many can say this for my age w/sons....age late 30's....
As for the conspiracy theory, so what, come and get me....
LL, I ENJOYED this thread, it is a good one, as I admitt I often wondered (sheesh toooo many tonite) what others look like.
HAWK,
you still doing the gervbils? opps.........
<<<<
Dog, bet your cute.
-- consumer (shh@aol.com), March 27, 2000.
Consumer, Ha, ha! I'll bet you DO have a royal buzz on.Even with a glass of wine in me this evening, I can spell Margarita. (However, I'm not one of the retentives that thinks we should bother with a spell-checker.)
Hey! While you're here, could you please tell Brian all the things I've been trying to sell you? (Laughter)
(I'd rather buy you another round, darlin' :o)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 27, 2000.
Brian,Are y'all tryin' ta fluster our brave lil' freedom fighter?
Ll,
Who does your friend Bagga look like?
-- flora (***@__._), March 27, 2000.
Hi Laura!heh, you really got'em going tonite don't you? LOL! I thought linking the descriptions of forum posters to celebs was a great way to create a visual for the rest of us. Worked for me and I thought it was F-U- N!
How's that software research going? Give me a buzz tomorrow if you get a sec....
toodles! ;o)
-- LZach (lisa@texasnetworks.com), March 27, 2000.
Brian,I have the feeling you're going to come back here and say, "I never said you were trying to sell anything. I said, I don't know WHAT you're doing."
May I remind you that I've said many times in the past that I believe that people's motivations (for the most part) are love (pleasure) or money?
I LIKE some of these people. They DO give me pleasure, even if they're only words on a page.
Y2k brought me way too much grief. Most of the people here don't, because I can relate to them. They're the only people in the world who share my history; in a period of my life that was economically, personally, and socially embarassing for me.
Please reevaluate what you're thinking. I'm a real, live human being with feelings too.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
Hi, you guys!flora,
I wish I knew! (He never contacted me.)
Lisa!
I can't find your phone number, so I'm going to go look your phone number up on your webpage tomorrow. I'll call about 10:00 my time (which is about 11:00 yours?)
Chow for now!
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
its all for the freakin files she is keeping on everyone so she can make everyone pay for the fud they created. she just calls it fun to confuseremember she was going to write a book about all the losers and the winners in y2k? with the emphisis on losers and what they cost the world with the fud and the winning stars such as herself
bitch!
-- LL lies (andherlittledog@cin.too), March 27, 2000.
Patricia, you are so transparent it's pathetic.
I said a LONG time ago I'm not gonna write a book. I also told YOU we're not important.
I'M NOT IMPORTANT.
I don't know how much more clear I can make that.
Now, ride off on that little dog you rode in on.
Arf
~*~!
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 27, 2000.
Sorry, cin. I hope no one thinks -- I think -- you're the dog she rode on on.
Pat's pissed off because I didn't include her in my mental images, [I'm too nice to do that, *g*] and because I wasn't going to write about her, when I thought about writing a book, and told her so.
Some people have an over-inflated sense of their importance in the world, and they need to take pot-shots at us to make themselves feel superior. It's no big deal, cin. I think they deserve our pity, not our scorn.
Chow, babe!
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 27, 2000.
I've always pictured Laura as Mimi Bobeck, the secretary on The Drew Carey Show.Anyone else ever seen that show? Is it still on? Been years since I last saw it! LOL
So, am I close?
-- thinking of you (LL@tossing.cookies), March 27, 2000.
Patricia,
I was going to come back with a smart-aleck quip about your TV viewing habits (Green acres, and the Honeymooners *g*) but the truth is, watching you digress into a internet troll is painful to me.
I KNOW you have more to offer this world, so why are you wasting your time on me? This is so damn wierd, I can't believe it. I think the only reason it's happening is because you're drinking to excess, (I'll never forget the times you were drinking in the DeBunker chatroom) because you've been disappointed with your relationship with Doc?
I honestly don't know what's going on with you, but when you sober up, I wish you'd call me.
I'm willing to forgive, and forget, from this moment on; how 'bout you?
Sleep tight, Pat. The pain's almost over.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 28, 2000.
>> Brian, I'm sitting here in pure amazement. I'm wondering how you could possibly come up with such a bizarre assessment of me. <<Three words: your bizarre behavior.
No doubt you believe your behavior to fall well in the middle of normal. My assessment is, uh, rather less flattering. Even if what you have said is a pure and limpid reflection of your normal state of mind, I would not trust you.
Sorry. That is my firm opinion. Telling me I am mistaken is not sufficient to change my mind. Steadfast, reliable people do not act as you have acted or speak as you have spoken.
The fact that you have not had an outbreak of spamming or uncontrolled anger for several months is appreciated. But even during that time I see evidence of the trickery I spoke of before. If you are perplexed by this assessment, then the chances are you really are unconcious of how you strike (at least some) other people. Too bad. If you can't see it, you can't change it.
I will try not to participate in any further threads you initiate "for fun". No reason to flog a dead horse.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 28, 2000.
She's makin' a list and checkin' it twice
Gonna find out who's naughty or niceOld Git
Diane Squire
Lisa B.
Helen
Anita
Manny
Cavscout
Netghost
Hawk
Steve Heller
cpr
Ron Schwarz
Richard Dale
Mr. Polly
hattie
CJS
Porky
PatriciaGolly Winkies, why is Laura being trolled by all these people?
(Watchin' as she sharpens the lead of her #2 pencil, and begins scrawling on a page of wide-ruled recycled paper, making a new addition to The List...Brian McLaughlin) P.S. - Did I miss anyone?
8o)
-- Still Loony (after@all.these years), March 28, 2000.
There is the English teacher from another thread.
-- LL is nutz (nutz@nutz.nutz), March 28, 2000.
"He who lies artistically treads closer to the truth than ever he knows."
-- Ningauble quotes proverb (Adepts@gambit.142), March 28, 2000.
Allright peopleGo on back to your homes
There's nothing to see here
Move along now
=oP
-- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 28, 2000.
Hey cin,go jump
-- JUMP! (doit@the.bridge), March 28, 2000.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me,than a frontal lobotomy. : )
-- capnfun (capnfun1@excite.com), March 28, 2000.
tut tut, I think if you reread cin's post, you will find that she was not denigrading Dr. Schenker. She merely thanked him, and then continued on to say she thinks "Mad genius" comes to mind when she thinks of MENSA members. -- (No@problem.here), March 27, 2000.No Problem,
I read it. I saw what it said. I understood it. I commented on it. It seems that you do not see the disregard she showed for his hard work with which he earned the title of Doctor, symbolized by the abbreviation Dr. or MD. She called him Mister. This is rather rude. In certain situations this could be considered very rude. I pointed this out to her. Now I am pointing it out to you.
Since Dr. Schenker also signed with the name Bill, she could have just as easily referred to him as Bill. But she didn't. Cin chose to use the title Mr.
Because Cin has displayed a lack of reading and comprehension skills in several [if not all] posts of hers, I have chosen to bring it to her attention. It is my hope that she may be able to remedy this lack, and thus enjoy the various conversations on the board more completely. It may also help her to post more intelligently as well. You may want to try it.
Below is a prime example of her limited comprehension skills. She considers a mention of the misuse of titles as an argument.
Unless you or she wants to try and tell me that a question is an argument? Then again, it may just be another poor choice of words on her part.
You know...I feel sorry for you. Living your life thinking that you're right and no one else possibly could be, seems a sad existence to me. There is absolutely no sense in arguing with you. You will never ever see anything but the world according to you. How truly lonely and solitary you must be. Argue with yourself. I won't waste any more time on you, as there is no point to it. Good day. -- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 27, 2000.
cin, cin, cin,
Now you're assuming facts without any hard data. You do know what happens when you assume, right? Here is a little info for ya, toots!
I have Seven classes a day. Average of twenty-five students in each. Can you do the math? Here, let me: 7 x 25 = 175. Plus six of my own. 175 + 6 = 181. Add a spouse to the mix, 181 + 1 = 182. Then church, community projects, reading at the library to young children. The friends of my children, and the children of my friends. Yet, here I am trying to help you.
Ungrateful slacker bitch. (Oops! Was that outloud?)
-- Just a teacher (butverygood@teaching.thewilling), March 28, 2000.
Brian,You said, Three words: your bizarre behavior and, The fact that you have not had an outbreak of spamming or uncontrolled anger for several months is appreciated.
Brian, I've explained my "bizarre behavior" on four boards now, and I'm not going to keep doing it. I freely admit my behavior has been bizarre on occasion. However, if you don't understand that it took extreme measures to try to get people's attention before the rollover, (however, useless it was) then nothing I ever say will make any difference anyway. Furthermore, if you don't understand why I bombed the Bomb, I don't understand why you're here instead of EZBoard.
Like I said, I freely admit my behavior was bizarre. I guess if there's one quote that I would use to describe my behavior, it would be: "Extreme times call for extreme measures", and if my extremism actually hurt anyone, I apologize to them for it.
Do actually think for a moment I've enjoyed spending days, no months, of my life spamming and hollering at people to tell them what was happening?
NO! I DIDN'T ENJOY IT!!
If you don't understand, or appreciate my efforts, that's all right. I never in my wildest dreams thought everyone would understand, or that I would ever even get a "thank you" from anyone.
I agree with you on one thing. We do need to to quit flogging this dead horse. You just don't understand, and I can't implant something in you, just because I want you to.
Pat,
You were the first person I thought of when I woke up this morning. There's a lot I'd like to talk to you about; there's a lot I'd like to say to you from my heart. However, I refuse to talk to anyone who's trolling me using a fake handle, so if you honestly have something you want to discuss with me, I'd like to do it now. My life's going to get pretty busy next week, and we may never have this opportunity again.
Lisa, (If you're reading this)
I have to go find a URL I want you to look at before I call. I'm going to go dig it up and e-mail it to you in about a half hour.
Later, ya'll
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 28, 2000.
LLyour arrogance is showing...
-- humph! (likeyoure@lly.care), March 28, 2000.
Loony,Patricia is no more here trolling you than all the other people you've added to The List and had to apologize to. Interesting how hard it is to convince the paranoid...Interesting to try. Eventually most of us will get bored, but we are curious about the pathologically paranoid, so it's hard to stay away.
In particular, I wonder which tool--critical thinking, or ridicule-- is more effective in confronting paranoia. So far, you appear not to be affected by either, but most interestingly you are convinced you are being logical despite the comical reasoning. The true pathology of the paranoid, I guess. I don't have a particular mission to dissuade you; more of a lab experiment.
One thing I've learned from watching you is how much you have in common with the mouth breathing tinfoil zombies who were the true paranoid zealots of Y2K doooom. PLEASE!!!! Don't EVER stop your list-making! I'm sure there are more people who have made it their mission to annoy you. You must ferret them ALL out and expose them here!! It's for the children!!
-- Still Loony (after@all.these years), March 28, 2000.
Good morning Laura,I'm just curious what attributes you ascribe to Flint & Decker that paint a picture in your head of a couple of popular, attractive black men? It's a serious question, not a flame. Were you looking for responses, maybe?
When you wrote about 'verbal & non-verbal deception' the other day, did that mean you were familiar with the 'subliminal seduction' stuff that was so widespread in the '70's? Do you have a feeling that your attraction to the Y2k 'craze' may be similar to interests of the past in psychological trends?
-- flora (***@__._), March 28, 2000.
Hi flora!I'm just on my way out the door, so I can't answer your questions fully now. However, I'll just touch base on them...
I'm just curious what attributes you ascribe to Flint & Decker that paint a picture in your head of a couple of popular, attractive black men?
I think they're black, so I chose black men that I think they might look like. (I take Flint much more seriously than Decker, so he got the Dr. Martin Luther King distinction.)
When you wrote about 'verbal & non-verbal deception' the other day, did that mean you were familiar with the 'subliminal seduction' stuff that was so widespread in the '70's?
No. My research in that rhelm was limited to verbal and nonverbal indicators of deception. That means lying only.
Do you have a feeling that your attraction to the Y2k 'craze' may be similar to interests of the past in psychological trends?
No. Absolutely not. My attraction was based solely on my (chuckle) lack of computer knowledge.
Gotta go, babe. See ya later.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 28, 2000.
LL must have a 1 o'clock class to teach.I see a paper or a dissertation from a Sociology department at a major university coming from all the information she/he is gathering.
I think she/he is pretty far removed from trailor trash. I think she/he is one smart cookie happily pushing our buttons and recording reactions.
-- Pam (jpjgood@penn.com), March 28, 2000.
>> We do need to to quit flogging this dead horse. <<I am sure nothing would please you more. I'm willing. Really. Although, it was fun while it lasted.
Have you ever heard one of those old Celtic legends, where the witch is being hunted, but to escape, she keeps changing shape, from a hag to a wolf, to a whirlwind, to a hare...?
>> You just don't understand ... <<
You weren't holding up your end, so I dropped mine, too.
>> ... and I can't implant something in you, just because I want you to. <<
Nudge. Nudge. Wink. Wink. You speak true. Have a nice day.
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 28, 2000.
For the record, I am not an African-American.
-- Ken Decker (kcdecker@worldnet.att.net), March 28, 2000.
Ken:For the record, I am not an African-American.
-- Ken Decker (kcdecker@worldnet.att.net), March 28, 2000.
Not really and insult in my mind. In the last two weeks, I have been called Flint, Decker and, horror of HORRORS , Martha Stewart. Got to cut these new people some slack :o)......
Best Wishes,,,,
Z
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 28, 2000.
>> For the record, I am not an African-American. <<Considering your state of residence, the odds were way against it!
-- Brian McLaughlin (brianm@ims.com), March 28, 2000.
Teacher, you're spun. May I suggest thorazine?
-- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 28, 2000.
Brian:Unless that is North Dakota of Alaska. I think that unlikely.
Best wishes,,,,
Z
-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), March 28, 2000.
Argue with yourself. I won't waste any more time on you, as there is no point to it. Good day. -- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 27, 2000.Teacher, please get help before you harm someone. There is obviously something wrong with you. If you really are a teacher, may God help those children. -- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 28, 2000.
Teacher, you're spun. May I suggest thorazine? -- cin (cinlooo@aol.corn), March 28, 2000.
LOL ROTFLMAO
HA HA HA HA ho ho ho ho heh heh
That's typical!
Memory failing, dear?
-- liar! liar! (pants@on.fire), March 28, 2000.
Well, well, well.
It looks like I have absolutely NO talent for guessing what the men look like. I'll leave all of them off (except the EZBoard members and old TB sysops) with the exception of those of you who requested descriptions on my next round of guesses.
Toodleloo 'till later!
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@....), March 28, 2000.
Doesn't anyone have a mental picture of LL?I picture her as a Murphy Brown.
-- Pam (jpjgood@penn.com), March 28, 2000.
Pam,
You are wrong, but cool beyond belief.
I love Candice Bergen; didn't she play the part of a smart, strong- willed, network reporter? (Sorry, I only fit one of those categories.)
(Furthermore, I've never had children or a nice-looking interior decorator :o)
Thanks for the memories, though.
(You must be about my age? Are you ever going to tell me who you are?)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 28, 2000.
I freely admit my behavior has been bizarre on occasion. However, if you don't understand that it took extreme measures to try to get people's attention before the rollover......I guess if there's one quote that I would use to describe my behavior, it would be: "Extreme times call for extreme measures"Pardon me LL, but I have, for the most part, refrained from addressing you and your "issues" on this board, for I feel that it is no more gallant for me to pick on your mental gyrations than it would be for me to prod a cripple because he cannot walk, but this past self-serving malarky is just too much.
"Extreme times call for extreme measures"
Horseshit. Your behavior in the past, most especially in regards to the scrolling attacks in Bok's chat room had nothing to do with extreme times. We were folks trying to enjoy conversation, blowing off a bit of steam as it were. You denied us that with your juvenile scroll attacks and ruined a fine place to meet. No serious issues needed to be debunked in that room, none of your "extreme measures" did anything but stop folks from enjoying plain old simple human inter-action. To attempt to excuse your childish "Burning of the ants with a magnifying glass" behavior by sugarcoating it as something you did for our own good is an so low as too....ah fuck it, look who I am talking to, nevermind Laura, you would not understand.
-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), March 29, 2000.
Unk, be REAL careful, you never know how close you are to the fuse, nor how short that fuse might be today.nn@tt
-- nope (not@this.time), March 29, 2000.
Lol, nope!
You guys don't need to walk on egg shells around me anymore. Certainly nothing Uncle Deedah says can bother me.
Deedah,
I've explain why I ruined your "fun" at Bok's a half dozen times. Obviously, you're too blind or too stupid to understand, so I'm not going to waste my time typing it out again.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 29, 2000.
I will say this, uncle doodoo. I DID enjoy kicking you and Cynthia around.
Anyone here who has never kicked an anthill for the sheer joy of watching the ants scurry about the mound, would you please stand up.
-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), March 29, 2000.
(However, I'm sorry the others suffered. If you remember right, I sent Bok a letter of apology.)
Later! I have better things to do with my time than waste it on you.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 29, 2000.
What were you expecting, Unky D? Insight or sumthin'?She's jes' usin' y'all to practice her self-esteem. Snappier comebacks and all. Gotta put them IQ points to some use, doncha know.
-- xx (xx@xx.xx), March 29, 2000.
Laura,I thought you might have been riffing on the 'bama thing with Flint. Must've missed the tossed mazels, huh.
'Red',
Not that there's anything WRONG with that {hope you were a Seinfeld fan, wee bit o' humor}.
-- flora (***@__._), March 29, 2000.
I've explain why I ruined your "fun" at Bok's a half dozen times. Obviously, you're too blind or too stupid to understand, so I'm not going to waste my time typing it out again.For our own good, of course. That and because Cynthia spent too much time in the chat room, in your opinion.
But enough out of me, I'm finished prodding the cripple.
-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), March 29, 2000.
Uncule Deedah: Thanks for telling it like it is. I am like you, I don't forgive and I don't forget. A leopard cannot change it's spot. BFD that she sent a letter to Bok apologizing for ruining the chat room. The damage has already been done, it's unrepairable. Isn't it ironic that everything forum and chatroom she has been a part of has been destroyed by her?
-- Jimmy (JimmyHendrixx@Jimmyyy.xcom), March 29, 2000.
On drugs again, huh Hendrix?
You may not have appreciated my motives in the past, and you know what? I don't give a shit.
However, if you toodle over to biffy, you'll notice it's still there. Doc, will tell you he closed DeBunker's because Y2k was over, and, WHERE THE HECK DO YOU THINK YOU'RE AT NOW??
Excuse me, I hate to work up a sweat over a pinhead.
I'd like to calmly point out that THIS forum is still functioning also.
But, trolls are too stupid to comprehend or understand anything.
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@...), March 29, 2000.
"Doc, will tell you he closed DeBunker's because Y2k was over"I have some different memories of why the forum was closed.
****This forum will close on Monday January 31, 2000 at 11PM Pst**** posted by Doc Paulie on January 30, 2000 at 22:57:12:
Due to the work of "they know who", this forum has lost the ability to accomplish anything. Sad it came to this but it has. Besides the forum is at least 3 weeks past being closed anyhow as Y2k is a DONE TURKEY.
We done good folks. Hats off to all! I will decline a sappy post as many of us will continue on our friendships in other fora. Enough to say, while this IS the end of Debunking Y2k(Y2k Debunked), there WILL BE new projects ahead from this camp. I will notify by email. Anyone interested, and not sure I have your email, forward to me to be added to any announcements I send out.
Thanks again to all, been a wild ride.
God Bless, Doc Paulie
-- (not@real.troll), March 29, 2000.
Besides the forum is at least 3 weeks past being closed anyhow as Y2k is a DONE TURKEY.
Read it, and read it again until you get it right.
(Besides, like I said; you're still typing HERE, aren't you?)
~*~
-- (Ladylogic@......), March 29, 2000.