>p>Remember this is the same CBS that reported the BANKS have been compliant for quite some time now. Oh the agony of it all..LOL

(CBS) Fantasy is usually welcome at Florida's theme parks, but when the U.S. Navy recently warned that the lights could go out in Disney World when the clock strikes the year 2000, Orlando city officials weren't amused. In response to the Navy's claim, Orlando Y2K manager Ron Parks says, "We've taken great strides really, in making progress towards this Y2K readiness." The city claims its utilities are Y2K compliant, reports CBS News Correspondent Diana Olick. That is, it has fixed any computer programs that might not recognize the year 2000 and therefore malfunction. They even launched an advertising campaign saying as much. "Are you ready for the year 2000?" the spots ask. "[Orlando Utilities Commission] is, in about 1,000 different ways."

Orlando officials got a letter from the Navy asking if the city would be ready for the New Year, their reply was a resounding yes. "Ooooh, believe me we're ready!" Parks says.

Still, Orlando, and many other cities wound up in a Navy study, published in the Internet, citing public utilities that might be in Y2K trouble. The news is a surprise to many city officials, including Ramon Miguez in Dallas. He says, "We wouldn't miss a beat, not the city of Dallas. We wouldn't miss a beat."

Even the Navy researcher who conducted the study told CBS News almost all the municipalities he contacted said they were compliant. But the study went from the Navy's Web site -- to a Y2K activist's Web page -- and before long hit newspapers and radio stations nationwide.

"Someone has looked at a very old edition of this database and has extrapolated dramatically,,?u>" explains Navy Facility Engineering Cmdr. Lou Smith. "Because that isn't what it said, that isn't what it means, and oh, by the way, that isn't where it is now."

The Navy removed the study from its Web site just two weeks ago, for fear the data might be misinterpreted. It now says it agrees with a recent report from the White House Committee on Y2K, which said any national electrical failures are highly unlikely. Apparently it was just human error that caused this latest scare.

-- y2k dave (xsdaa111@hotmail.com), August 24, 1999

underline off I hope. need more coffee

-- y2k dave (xsdaa111@hotmail.com), August 24, 1999.

cleanup crew

-- night janitorial staff (clean_up@web.co), August 24, 1999.

Thanks crew..

-- y2k dave (xsdaa111@hotmail.com), August 24, 1999.

"Someone has looked at a very old edition of this database and has extrapolated dramatically,...

Give me a break,what time zone is this guy living in when June 99 is "a very old edition" as slow as progress has been?

Watching Goodman

-- Watching Goodman (ITgoodmanHK@matt2444.com), August 24, 1999.

By "very old edition of the database" they probably meant before cities like Orlando launched an advertising campaign. And before the Whitehouse Committee "allayed" their fears. Rendon Group... your tax dollars at work.

-- Linda (lwmb@psln.com), August 24, 1999.

"Very old edition" my ass. Of course, when it comes to be CLEVER, nobody can beat the NY TIMES -- they said the data was from last "spring", which although probably technically accurate for the most part (i.e., June 1 thru June 21), manages to mislead beautifully.

-- King of Spain (madrid@aol.com), August 24, 1999.

This report really scared the hell out of them ..... notice that Dallas was not even going to replace a critical mainframe computer in tehir utilities and city management system until November.

But Dallas did somehow get llisted as one of only three "fully compliant" cities when the top 20 cities were found to be at risk in LATE JULY by Congress.

-- Robert A. Cook, PE (Kennesaw, GA) (cook.r@csaatl.com), August 24, 1999.

Robert mentioned

"This report really scared the hell out of them"

I would think that is the reports only use. A wake up call for those that aren't on their toes.

-- Brian (imager@home.com), August 24, 1999.

If it gets the cities to announce their status, this is a good thing.

If it [or TPTB] causes them to annouce 'good news' when it really isn't, then this is a bad thing.

Of course, telling the difference is the key!

Too much chance.......

-- J (jart5@bellsouth.net), August 24, 1999.

The information I read said the Navy report was last updated on 8/4/99. Very old information, NOT!!!

-- Leslie (***@***.net), August 24, 1999.