Hello all(posted 8787 days ago)I agreed and disagreed for the limitation of lives. For all gng's series I'm ok, except for gng. This one is really hard. Who can pass the 2 devils in stage 6 each time he plays ? Not me, and I known well this game. Secondly, where I play to gng in 1985 year, the last life bonus is to 980 K. They are no more and on gng version bonus life is very important.
Latest : what is boring when we look an inp ? Not make 10 or 20 loops, but leeching is boring. So, ban leeching, yes but play with only 5 lives on this hard version is hell. Think of all marp users who begin at gng. And this is for all games. I don't play well to Bomb Jack and I love this game. I'm worried when I saw you would like change the nomber of lives on this game too. It's not a solution, you risk to desinterest players on these games and make a game for elite only.
I understand Ramatan. He play with your rules and you don't accept the very little leeching he find. And, it's not these 9k he gain on fire bridge that made is inp illegal.
I vote yes for reduce the number of lives for all gng's safe gng. When we'll be 25 to make over 2 loops in this game, why not. But we are only... I don't know if even you made 2 loops in gng, Innuendo.
Another thing who can eliminate some leeching is to made a ranking by stage then by score. Who'll make leeching if it's for the second place ? And why you don't propose to play in hardest difficulty ?
For the Olympiad use the usual rules for gng. No die leeching in stage 3, no time bug. But escape the fire bridge dragon and the stage 5 devil is accepted. Ranking made by stage reach then by score as all games where I'm the coordinator.
François