This has become very important to me which is why I am asking this as a seperate question now. Can anyone remember seeing a case on this site (I am sure it was on this site) where the judge ruled that because the borrower had supplied a forwarding address and the BS claimed that the Branch had not passed it along that the borrower could not be held liable for the breakdown of communication within the BS. I am not sure if it was in an old thread on this Q&A forum or not. If anyone knows where it is please let me know.(posted 8511 days ago)