I don't understand the current scoring system. It appears to me that the current system really awards playing games with lots of clones, something I've tried to avoid. For example, I could get another Klax score, and another Dig Dug score (dzigzag to be precise) but I think it's pointless, and in the case of the 3 dig dugs.... digdugat, dugdignm and dzigzag, they are all exactly the same!(posted 9678 days ago)Neil Chapman played all 5 Crazy Kongs (which itself is a clone of Donkey Kong!) and a ton of pacman and mspacman variants. In my opinion the clones are inflating the scores, and the only way to compete is to play all the clones. Would it not be better to play the first original game, and call it the official version? Games with tons of clones have greater impact then games without clones. Is this fair?
My 2 cents, Mark