Ok, i really like the percentage scoring, but i have to add that maybe the TG system has "worked" for 20 years, but who says it couldn't have worked better if there was a little bit more incentive for beating someone's score.(posted 9684 days ago)I think right now i wouldn't mind with a plain percentage OR a percentage with a little benefit between the higher places. And you can't just disregaurd the rigorous battles for placement we've had with the 10 3 1 system, that totally boosts the quality of recordings. We may see less of those battles or we may not, but we know the 10 3 1 system incited battles.
The bowling thing and scores that tie don't need to adjust people because they had a 300 after someone else had 300, you just adjust the 2nd place score which ever score is less than 300, i.e. you make 2nd place the second place score not the second highest scoring person.
It is unfortunate that there are games with a maximum score that is easy to get like the 300's for bowling but i think that's something we have to live with.