I think your first point Aqua is a good one. I'm now thinking that judging won't be too serious of a problem.(posted 9683 days ago)The second point... are you saying that no game should be repeated in voting? So if I'm the first to vote, and I say pacman should be played(I know I won't...), nobody else can repeat that vote for that game?(I'm hoping I'm clear with that example...) If not... I'd like to make that modification... and say that'd be a good idea.
Your fourth and final point... I agree with the no division with the percentages... it can cause a scoring error... so we should just deal with straight addition. We can divide and get an average for statistical purposes, but I think the adding should be the official score.
The decremental scoring idea would be a good idea too. Let's wait for others to have a say on the rules first.(one where last gets 0, 2nd worst gets 1, etc... I think that's what you're saying.)
I think you got some good points Aquatarkus. If we get this going, and I wind up coordinating the thing, I'll most likely implement some of those rules.
Chris, I think if it's a small tournament, the scoring method you offered would work rather well. However, if it gets around the 15 - 20 person stage, it might be troublesome to some people.(tons of people wouldn't get the chance to score...)
Thanks for your opinions Aqua and Chris, I really appreciate them, and thanks to all for reading my further comments.