[ Post New Message | Post Reply to this One | Send Private Email to Chad | Help ]

Response to New Leaderboard Comments

from Chad (churritz@cts.com)
I don't believe in a points cuttoff if below a certain percent, I do believe the 10%, 15% or 20% adjustment to anyone who is below 1rst, 2nd, or 3rd place would be good. With the exepction of ties, it's wrong to give someone more credit if they have the same score because they did it first. So if you had 300 300 300 299 200 100 scores you'd have 100,100,100, 100-10=90, 66-15=51, 33-20=13. I still don't like all those 100's but it is the best score you can get in a game unless we want to count some other measure, say duration of playback, so they deserve the best score.
(posted 9687 days ago)

[ Previous | Next ]