I don't appreciate this remark. I spend a lot of time going through the dos and windows versions of the code to try to stop the obvious problem with mame35. As Chris Moore pointed out, it was always possible to "you-know-what" by re-compiling the code. If you thought my additions to mame35 were so "insecure" why did you bother using it? All someone had to do was show me some code for better encryption and I would have used it. Instead, I get to see these comments posted on a public message board. At the very least I did enough work to save the next guy from doing it all from stratch.(posted 9019 days ago)I'm not aware of any other SECURE versions. Maybe someone has already got a polished secure version of mame, but I seriously doubt it. I have a lot of respect for Ben Jos' programming abilities, but if he had something finished I think I would have seen it by now. In the mean time, I think win37b9tg2 is an improvement over the old mame35tg3 and I would encourage it's use on MARP unless Chris Moore objects to it.