I have a new idea for you to ponder, but first I'll vote.(posted 9397 days ago)1. NO - two months seem short enough, although I admit I don't play the entire two months... not really. As for the two month break, I'm neutral on that...
2. I'm neutral on this one - I'm game to keep it at ten or go ahead and reduce it a bit - I don't mind either way.
3. If we stay at 10 games, keep it at two, but if we go to the 5, 6, or 8 range, then we should go to one.
4. I think Pat's right - we're already doing that.
5. Keep it at one leaderboard - whatever that is doesn't matter :)
Now the new idea - I've been thinking of doing a "non-elimination" tournament - where two people go against each other one week at a time, playing one game each person wants to play, and perhaps another game picked out of random that the players vote for. Scoring would use percentage, and if the person wins, you move on - if not, you go to the consolation bracket - so you get to keep on playing. Mark Longridge did something similar to this quite a number of months ago... but not in a tournament bracket way...
This is just a preliminary idea - but I'm wondering of your opinions of it. Thanks for reading - GB9