I know this will make things more confusing, but I think I have a modification that might be an improvement to Aqua's.(posted 9613 days ago)Pick the N best games, maybe 50 maybe 100 maybe 500. Then after the best games, leaderpoint points would ONLY count for recordings that are in the top 3. So If you placed in the Top three in ALL of your recordings they all will count, no matter how many recordings you input. But If you put up many [of the controversal] lame scores, only the best N scores would count.
This will prevent someone from thinking that putting marker scores up for 1400 games will benefit their leaderboard score, since what should benefit the leaderboard score is if 1400 of those scores are in the top 3. I like the idea of using MARP as a database to mark your own best score at the moment, since who can remember what their high scores are for so many games. I'm not against quantity, i'm just against quantity without quality for a leaderboard score.