I must state that I commend voluntary work when udertaken by anyone.(posted 7937 days ago)I feel though that my main point is continually being avoided i.e. that a debt must be subject to 'strict proof'. I would not condemn anyone for agreeing a settlement on a proven debt and I'm sure that you would agree that nobody should condone the possible negligent actions of lenders by agreeing to any settlement on an unproven debt. I can therefore only assume that when you helped negotiate these settlements you had confirmed beforehand that the debts in question had been subjected to 'Strict Proof'.
Don't worry, nothing anyone can say will 'knock' me. It has taken four years because I believe I have the strength to fight for justice in my case. It may take many years more but I'm damned if I'll pay a penny on a debt that I believe was totally incurred by the negligent actions of the Halifax! Oh yes, I could choose the soft option and pay them off to leave me alone but look what that attitude has done to erode human rights throughout history. The only way to get justice is find out what your rights are and to then fight for them.
I will now give up responding to this thread because in my view it's inclined to one purpose. I reserve my right though to have continued suspicions about the sudden spate of "I've Settled" - "Congratulations" type messages to this forum.