I firmly agree with Don's response. I used FX-2 and TFX-2 extensively before trying PMK. PMK delivered much finer grain, higher acutance and better gradation than I got with any FX-2 formulation or processing technique. Not that FX-2 is bad--it's actually very good--but PMK is simply better.(posted 8166 days ago)One thing you'll find with PMK or any good tanning/staining developer is you can reduce development considerably from what looks to the eye like a "good" negative. The proportional buildup of stain allows you to achieve highlight density without extending development, which is in large part why it achieves the fine grain, sharpness and subtle gradations it is noted for. Good PMK negatives look rather thin and flat. Try reducing your time by 20% and see how it works. With 35mm I would recommend targeting your idea filtration to a #3 filter.
Hutchings' book is a very interesting reference, and I recommend it not only for instruction on using PMK but also for the many useful tips that apply to LF photography and b&w processing in general.