First to Frankie : you idea was good, but there is problem ... Frankie and Skito, WHAT DO YOU CALL "WIN A LEVEL" ? Skito says previously :"The key is that you can lose a level but still continue the game, but you dont get to see the lady of that level. You "win" a level when your current score on that level bests the VS computer players score"(posted 8949 days ago)IT'S WRONG ! Look at renzo's level 2 (1500 ; cpu:1600 he won) or my own level 4 (3260 ; cpu :2070 and I don't get the girl)
To Ozz : 5000 is too short, 10000 is better. Why ? Skito also says : "Ok, for B now you've changed your scoring to not subtract the cards if you finish the level prematurely? So you are benefiting people who commit suicide to finish a level and penalizing people who try to finish the last level"
With 10000 no real chance of benifite by suicide ; let's take an example ... with a little practice of the game you will see that higher scores reachable are around 5000, and subtraction with my formula (after a lot of games played doesn't exceed -3000 or -4000 for level 6-7-8) ; let's say I finish level 6 with 4500 : if I suicide at 7 score will be 64500 ; if I play and finish level 7 but lose and get -3000 by my subtraction method I will have 67000 ... with only 5000 it would be not good ; of course if I reach level 20 like Skito says (but IMO it's impossible) it might give advantage to suicid, and to prevent that we should take 10000+ but not 5000