[
Post New Message |
Post Reply to this One |
Send Private Email to Terry |
Help
]
Response to Do I settle or fight on ? (Eversheds/Grabby)
from Terry (terry.harborne@ukgateway.net)
I also see think that lenders will see small sums paid as settlement
as a sign that the borrower has reached an agreement. A court would
take the view that bank X has agreed to settle for X instead of the
amount they are claiming. By not accepting this figure a court may
then take the view that the offer was a good one and you had the
chance to pay it, by not doing so and then having bank X chase you
for more, their claim could be a good one (even though we know it
wouldn't be) and may make an order for you to pay. I had a similar
experience over the last few days when I ordered a camera for the g/f
from dabs.com. The camera wasn't delivered twice. I threatened them
with breach of contract. They (after a number of phone calls and
emails) then agreed to provide me with a more expensive camera at the
same price as the one I ordered providing that was the end of the
matter. If I hadn't accepted they it would have gone to court and
they could have relied on the fact that they made a reasonable (in
their eyes) offer to settle the dispute and I refused. A judge (imho)
would have taken their view at this stage and I may have ended up
with just my money back and no goods.
I also believe that the banks will want something back, no matter how
little the amount is as they need to save face as well. Whilst we may
all agree that they are all a complete bunch of bastards and that we
dispute the amounts they are claiming, as others here have agreed,
it's a personal thing and it can stop a lot of headaches for you. In
my case I settled and two months later bought a new home. If there
was no chance of me getting a new mortgage so quickly there is no way
I would have settled. I think that you guys are doing a great job and
are causing problems for these banks, this is great however you need
to sort your own problems out as well as everybody else's (if that
makes sense). You need to see courts and counsel working to see what
I mean. They bargain for the best settlements, they rarely get a
claim set aside, they rarely get all the claim that they want as
well.
My final point is the emotional side of these disputes. We don't know
what this is really doing to some people. If they are offered a small
settlement figure, who are we to say to them to continue in the hope
that the debt will be quashed. They may be getting pressure from
husbands/wives (new and old) to settle so that they can have a normal
(for want of a better word) life. I would always say settle if you
are happy to do so, screw the bastards if you are not. Seeing a
£45000 shortfall claim reduced to a few thousand doesn't half make
you feel good. You feel like you've won and that is the big bonus!
All the best,
Terry
(posted 9002 days ago)
[
Previous |
Next
]